Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Explaining Performance and Symptom Validity Testing to the Trier of Fact

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation

  • 378 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical neuropsychologists are routinely called upon to assist the trier of fact in determining the veracity (i.e., validity) of a litigant’s cognitive complaints as well as their subjective complaints across multiple domains. There are a number of methods for determining the validity of the evaluation results. This chapter focuses on performance and symptom validity tests which provide objective data regarding the credibility of an examinee’s cognitive and/or psychological complaints. In addition to providing a brief overview of performance and symptom validity tests, we have also included several case scenarios to demonstrate how performance and symptom validity test findings contribute to the trier of fact’s understanding of validity tests as well as the role and necessity of objective validity testing as part of a clinical neuropsychological evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology. (2007). AACN practice guidelines for neuropsychological assessment and consultation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, G. C., Antonini, T. N., Monahan, K., Gelfius, C., Klamar, K., Potts, M., et al. (2014). The relationship between suboptimal effort and postconcussion symptoms in children and adolescents with mild traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 786–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ardolf, B. R., Denney, R. L., & Houston, C. M. (2007). Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 899–916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008/2011). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – 2 Restructured Form) manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, K. J., Curtin, K. L., & Greve, K. W. (2006). Compensation and malingering in traumatic brain injury: A dose-response relationship. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 831–847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, T., Merten, T., & Benke, T. (2019). Performance validity measures in clinical patients with aphasia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41, 476–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, K. B. (Ed.). (2007). Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Troster, A. I., Barth, J. I., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., et al. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity: NAN Policy & Planning Committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, M. D. (2008). Malingering on the social security disability consultative exam: Predictors and base rates. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 529–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou, M., Bauer, L., Ashendorf, L., Fisher, J. M., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2005). Is poor performance on recognition memory effort measures indicative of generalized poor performance on neuropsychological tests? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 191–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou, M., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2003). Using the TOMM for evaluating children’s effort to perform optimally on neuropsychological measures. Child Neuropsychology, 9, 81–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Critchfield, E., Soble, J. R., Marceaux, J. C., Bain, K. M., Bailey, K. C., Webber, T. A., et al. (2019). Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: Analyzing performance patterns among cognitive unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33, 1083–1101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dandachi-Fitzgerald, B., Merckelbach, H., & Ponds, R. W. H. M. (2017). Neuropsychologists’ ability to predict distorted symptoms presentation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39, 257–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. J., & Millis, S. R. (2014). Examination of performance validity test failure in relation to the number of tests administered. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 199–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, A. C., Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., & Arnold, G. (2008). The relationship of IQ to effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 705–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erdodi, L. A., & Abeare, C. A. (2019). Stronger together: The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Fourth Edition as a multivariate performance validity test in patients with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35, 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., & Ackley, M. A. (1998). Did you think it was going to be easy? Some methodological suggestions for the investigation and development of malingering detection techniques. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 1–54). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2003). Word memory test. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Green’s Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2007). The pervasive influence of effort on neuropsychological tests. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 18, 43–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Rohling, M. S., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M. (2001). Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claims. Brain Injury, 15, 1045–1060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, K., Curtis, K. L., & Bianchini, K. J. (2013). Symptom validity testing: A summary of recent research. In S. P. Koffler, J. Morgan, I. S. Baron, & M. F. Greiffenstein (Eds.), Neuropsychology: Science and practice, I (pp. 61–94). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Black, F. W., Heinly, M. T., Love, J. M., Swift, D. A., et al. (2006). The prevalence of cognitive malingering in persons reporting exposure to occupational and environmental substances. Neurotoxicology, 27, 940–950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. L., Millis, S. R., & Conference Participants. (2009). American academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093–1129.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J. (2007). Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J. (2014a). False-positive rates associated with the use of multiple performance and symptom validity tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29, 364–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J. (2014b). Minimizing false positive error with multiple performance validity tests: Response to Bilder, Sugar, and Hellemann. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 1230–1242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., & Meyers, J. E. (2019). Use of multiple performance and symptom validity measures: Determining the optimal per test cutoff for determination of invalidity, analysis of skew, and inter-test correlations in valid and invalid performance groups. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33, 1354–1372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Haley, P. R., English, L. T., & Glenn, W. J. (1991). A fake bad scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Psychological Reports, 68(1), 203–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, S. M. (2018). Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: A clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32, 391–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, R. J., Lynch, J. K., & Howe, L. S. (2012). Explaining symptom validity to the trier of fact. In C. R. Reynolds & A. M. Horton Jr. (Eds.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 287–299). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, R. J., Lynch, J. K., Leark, R., & Reynolds, C. R. (2020). Pediatric performance validity test suite (PdPVTS). North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, C., Crawford, S., & Evans, J. J. (2019). Effort testing in dementia assessment: A systematic review. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34, 114–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miele, A. S., Gunner, J. H., Lynch, J. K., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2012). Are embedded validity indices equivalent to freestanding symptom validity tests? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 10–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Bryant, S. E., Duff, K., Fisher, J., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2004). Performance profiles and cut-off scores on the Memory Assessment Scales. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 489–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proto, D. A., Pastorek, N. J., Miller, B. I., Romessor, J. M., Sim, A. H., & Linck, J. F. (2014). The dangers of failing one or more performance validity tests in individuals claiming mild traumatic brain injury-related postconcussive symptoms. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29, 614–624.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Livingston, R. B. (2012). Mastering modern psychological testing: Theory & methods. NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., Heinrichs, R. J., & Baade, L. E. (2019). Research methods in performance validity testing studies: Criterion grouping approach impacts study outcomes. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33, 466–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slick, D., Hopp, G., Strauss, E., & Thompson, G. B. (1997). Victoria symptom validity test. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. P., & Burger, G. K. (1997). Detection of malingering: Validation of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25(2), 183–189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Boone, K., Victor, T., Miora, D., Cottingham, M., Ziegler, E., et al. (2014). Comparison of credible patients of very low intelligence and non-credible patients on neurocognitive performance validity indicators. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 1048–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sollman, M. J., & Berry, D. T. R. (2011). Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: A meta-analytic update and extension. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(8), 774–789. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B. K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college students in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 189–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh, T. (1996). Test of malingering memory. North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh, T., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2020). Test of malingering memory – 2 (TOMM – 2). North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, C. D., Berry, D. T. R., Dearth, C. S., Vagnini, V. L., Baser, R. E., Cragar, D. E., et al. (2004). Head injury and the ability to feign neuropsychological deficits. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(02)00170-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Serpa, J. G., Buehler, J., & Ziegler, E. A. (2009). Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 297–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widows, M. R., & Smith, G. P. (2005). Structured inventory of malingered symptomatology, professional manual. FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Albany Neuropsychological Associates, Albany, NY, USA

    Robert J. McCaffrey & Julie K. Lynch

  2. Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA

    Maha N. Mian & Rachel A. Clegg

Authors
  1. Robert J. McCaffrey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maha N. Mian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rachel A. Clegg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julie K. Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Neuropsychology Section, Psych Associates of Maryland Towson and Columbia, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Arthur MacNeill Horton, Jr.

  2. Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University College Station, Austin, TX, USA

    Cecil R. Reynolds

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McCaffrey, R.J., Mian, M.N., Clegg, R.A., Lynch, J.K. (2021). Explaining Performance and Symptom Validity Testing to the Trier of Fact. In: Horton, Jr., A.M., Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54656-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation