Skip to main content

How to Work More Inclusively with ‘The People It’s About’ to Foster More Inclusive Outcomes: A Behavioural Insight and Behavioural Design Perspective on Co-production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2407 Accesses

Abstract

The success of co-production relies on successful inclusion of the people it’s about, but inherent in ‘inclusive’ are some key challenges caused by the human mind. The chapter offers psychological and anthropological perspectives that can help us understand the dynamics of these, but also enable us to address these. By applying behavioural insights and behavioural design, such as nudging and the change methodology called Inclusion Nudges, we can change hidden barriers to strengths in user and community co-production. This is an argument for applying a new approach to co-production that include the people it’s about without them knowing, but still motivating them to make changes, as well as enabling and empowering them to engage in co-producing better solutions and services. The author argues that inclusive development has to be the norm. It should not be an option—it should be the default by design in everything we do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bok, D. (2011). The Politics of Happiness: What Government Can Learn from the New Research on Well-Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (Eds.), (2016). Public Management and Governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A.J., Fiske, S., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1): 61–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dardenne, B., & Leyens, J. (1995). Confirmation Bias as a Social Skill. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11): 1229–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., & Vlaev, I. (2010). MINDSPACE: Influencing Behaviour through Public Policy. http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/mindspace. Accessed September 27, 2016.

  • Gächter, S., Orzen, H., Renner, E., & Starmer, C. (2009). Are Experimental Economists Prone to Framing Effects? A Natural Field Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70: 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A., & Moskowitz, G. (2000). Perspective-Taking: Decreasing Stereotype Expression, Stereotype Accessibility, and In-Group Favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4): 708–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepinski, L., & Nielsen, T. (2020). Inclusion Nudges Guidebook. 3rd edition.Aarhus, Denmark: The Inclusion Nudges Global Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A.W., Gelfand, M., Bélanger J.J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism. Political Psychology, 35: 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2016). User and Community Co-Production of Public Services: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? International Journal of Public Administration, November 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler, E., & Martin, S. (2015). Citizen engagement. In T. Bovaird & E. Loeffler (eds.), Public Management and Governance. 3rd edition. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler, E., Parrado, S., Bovaird, T., & van Ryzin, G. (2008). If You Want to Go Fast, Walk Alone: If You Want to Go Far, Walk Together. Citizens and the Co-Production of Public Services. Report to EU Presidency. Paris, France: Ministry of Finance, Budget & Public Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, C.N., Bodenhansen, G.V., Miine, A.B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of Mind but Back in Sight: Stereotypes on the Rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 808–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2008). Learning and Instruction. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R.S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2): 175–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, T. (2016). Inclusive Co-Design & Behavioural Change Methodology. Graphic Illustration. http://www.movetheelephant.org.

  • Novembre, G., Zanon, M., & Silani, G. (2015). Empathy for Social Exclusion Involves the Sensory-Discriminative Component of Pain: A Within-Subject fMRI Study. SCAN, 10: 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Crucial Conceptual Issues. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2015). The Village Effect: How Face-to-Face Contact Can Make Us Healthier and Happier. Toronto: Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.(2001). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2000). Individual Difference in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5): 645–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2006). The Worked Example Effect and Human Cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2): 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C., Austin, W.G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. Organizational Identity: A Reader (pp. 56–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 27, 185(4157): 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum, Global Risk Reports from: 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tinna C. Nielsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nielsen, T.C. (2021). How to Work More Inclusively with ‘The People It’s About’ to Foster More Inclusive Outcomes: A Behavioural Insight and Behavioural Design Perspective on Co-production. In: Loeffler, E., Bovaird, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics