Skip to main content

Improvement in Quality of Virtual Laboratory Experiment Designs by Using the Online SDVIcE Tool

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cross Reality and Data Science in Engineering (REV 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1231))

Abstract

The major problem engineering instructors have when they wish to effectively integrate any educational technology such as virtual laboratories is the lack of comprehensive guidelines. This paper discusses the design and development of the experiment design guidelines, which enable engineering instructors to design effective virtual laboratory experiments. The instructors follow a step-by-step process for the scientific design of various virtual laboratory experiments and the online SDVIcE tool provides scaffolds with description of various aspects of the experiment design. The effectiveness of the SDVIcE tool is established with the help of a quasi-experimental study carried out with 39 UG engineering students. The students were divided into two groups. The control group students perform the experiment in virtual lab using the traditional experiment design and the students from the experiment group perform experiments designed using the SDVIcE tool. The results of the study indicate that the laboratory learning outcomes and skills developed are improved when they perform experiment in the virtual laboratory with experiment designs carried out using the SDVIcE tool. So it can be claimed that the SDVIcE tool is effective in improving the quality of the virtual laboratory experiment designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Feisel, L.D., Peterson, G.D.: A colloquy on learning objectives for engineering education laboratories (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Draper, S.W., Brown, M.I., Henderson, F.P., McAteer, E.: Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL. Comput. Educ. 26(1–3), 17–32 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Watson, T.J.: The Role of the laboratory in applied science. J. Eng. Educ. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gomes, L., García-zubía, J.: Advances on remote laboratories and e-learning experiences (n.d.)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abdulwahed, M., Nagy, Z.K.: Computers & education the TriLab, a novel ICT based triple access mode laboratory education model. Comput. Educ. 56(1), 262–274 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Jong, T., Linn, M.C., Zacharia, Z.C.: Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science 340(6130), 305–308 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jona, K., Adsit, J.: Goals, Guidelines, and Standards for Student Scientific Investigations, June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ercil, N.: Remote RF Laboratory Requirements : Engineers ’ and Technicians ’ Perspective, pp. 80–95, October 2007

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pati, B., Misra, S., Mohanty, A.: A Model for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Software Engineering Virtual Labs (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hofstein, A., Lunetta, V.N.: The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci. Educ. 88(1), 28–54 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hofstein, A.: The laboratory in chemistry education: thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research laboratory activities have long had a distinctive and central role in the science to quote from Ira Ramsen (1846–1927), who wrote his me. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 5(3), 247–264 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris, J., Koehler, M., Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P.: What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge?, vol. 9, pp. 60–70 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nachmias, R., Ram, J., Segev, L., Mioduser, D.: A Campus-Wide Project of Web based Academic Instruction : Research Framework and Preliminary Results. Pedagogies (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chin, S.T.S., Williams, J.B.: A theoretical framework for effective online course design. MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 2(1), 12–21 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scalise, K., Timms, M., Moorjani, A., Clark, L., Holtermann, K., Irvin, P.S.: Student learning in science simulations: design features that promote learning gains. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 48(9), 1050–1078 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the engineering students for participating in the study and providing their valuable feedback to our survey questionnaire.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita S. Diwakar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Diwakar, A.S. (2021). Improvement in Quality of Virtual Laboratory Experiment Designs by Using the Online SDVIcE Tool. In: Auer, M., May, D. (eds) Cross Reality and Data Science in Engineering. REV 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics