Skip to main content

Safety and Security in Federated Remote Labs – A Requirement Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cross Reality and Data Science in Engineering (REV 2020)

Abstract

Recently, the interest of the educational community in laboratory- (lab-) based education has grown steadily. As remote and virtual labs have started to be a reliable alternative to traditional hands-on labs, security and safety issues are becoming increasingly important, especially in the case of remote laboratories, as their interconnected nature raises new and challenging issues. When multiple institutions are involved in a federated labs infrastructure, the complexity increases. Since a structured approach to assess safety and security for federated remote labs is missing, this paper aims at clarifying the general requirements to be considered and proposes a general concept for assessing safety and security in federated labs. Firstly, we analyze the current state on safety and security in remote labs by means of a literature review. Secondly, we investigate existing requirements and define operational requirements for a safety and security guideline in federated remote labs. Thirdly, we provide an overview about standardization approaches and existing guidelines and suggest a guideline, which matches our requirements analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://digilab4u.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://zenodo.org/record/1256626#.Xcsu71dKg2w; https://beaconing.eu/wp-content/uploads/deliverables/D1.8.pdf; https://beaconing.eu/wp-content/uploads/deliverables/D1.9.pdf.

References

  1. Heradio, R., de la Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Dormido, S.: Virtual and remote labs in education: a bibliometric analysis. Comput. Educ. 98, 14–38 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tawfik, M., Sancristobal, E., Ros, S., Hernandez, R., Robles, A., et al.: Middleware solutions for service-oriented remote laboratories: a review. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 74–82. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lisova, E., Šljivo, I., Čaušević, A.: Safety and security co-analyses: a systematic literature review. IEEE Syst. J. 13(3), 2189–2200 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Orduña, P., Rodriguez-Gil, L., Garcia-Zubia, J., Angulo, I., Hernandez, U., Azcuenaga, E.: Increasing the value of remote laboratory federations through an open sharing platform: LabsLand. In: Auer, M.E., Zutin, D.G. (eds.) Online Engineering & Internet of Things: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 22, pp. 859–873. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Henke, K., Vietzke, T., Wuttke, H.-D., Ostendorff, S.: Safety in interactive hybrid online labs. Int. J. Online Eng. (iJOE) 11(3), 56–61 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maiti, A., Kist, A., Maxwell, A.D.: Design and operational reliability of a Peer-to-Peer distributed remote access laboratory. In: Proceedings of 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Casini, M., Prattichizzo, D., Vicino, A.: Operating remote laboratories through a bootable device. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 54(6), 3134–3140 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kozík, T., Šimon, M.: Preparing and managing the remote experiment in education. In: 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marangé, P., Gellot, F., Riera, B.: Control validation of DES systems: application to remote laboratories. In: 2nd International Conference on Digital Information Management (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gerža, M., Schauer, F., Jašek, R.: Security of ISES measureserver® module for remote experiments against malign attacks. Int. J. Online Eng. 10(3), 4–10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ocaya, R.O.: A framework for collaborative remote experimentation for a physical laboratory using a low cost embedded web server. J. Network Comput. Appl. 34(4), 1408–1415 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chellaiah, P., Nair, B., Achuthan, K., Diwakar, S.: Using theme-based narrative construct of images as passwords: implementation and assessment of remembered sequences. Int. J. Online Eng. (iJOE) 13(11), 77–93 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krbeček, M., Schauer, F., Jasek, R.: Security aspects of remote e-laboratories. Int. J. Online Eng. 9(3), 34–39 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krbeček, M., Schauer, F.: Communication and diagnostic interfaces in remote laboratory management systems. Int. J. Online Eng. 11(5), 43–49 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sáenz, J., Esquembre, F., Garcia, F.J., de la Torre, L., Dormido, S.: A new model for a remote connection with hardware devices using Javascript. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(6), 133–137 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrera, M.S., Märquez, J.A., Borrero, A.M., Sänchez, M.M.: Testing bench for remote practical training in electric machines. IFAC Proc. Volumes 46(17), 357–362 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Border, C.: The development and deployment of a multi-user, remote access virtualization system for networking, security, and system administration classes. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 39(1), 576–580 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, P., Mohammed, T.: Integration of virtualization technology into network security laboratory. In: 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, S2A (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Richter, T., Watson, R., Kassavetis, S., Kraft, M., Grube, P., Boehringer, D., Logothetidis, S.: The WebLabs of the University of Cambridge: a study of securing remote instrumentation. In: 9th International Conference on Remote England Virtual Instrumentation (REV) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pálka, L., Schauer, F.: Safety of communication and neural networks for security enhancement in data warehouse for remote laboratories and Laboratory Management System. In: 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieter Uckelmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Uckelmann, D., Mezzogori, D., Esposito, G., Neroni, M., Reverberi, D., Ustenko, M. (2021). Safety and Security in Federated Remote Labs – A Requirement Analysis. In: Auer, M., May, D. (eds) Cross Reality and Data Science in Engineering. REV 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics