Abstract
In this study, Quality Circles and Kaizen Award evaluation process is inspected. Awarding process has been organized by Ankara Branch of Turkish Society for Quality (KalDer) since 2008 to support the continuous improvement activities and teamwork within the companies. The effects of evaluators’ decisions on awarding process are observed. Multi-criteria decision-making techniques are applied to reduce the subjectivity caused by the evaluators. The data of 13 Kobetsu Kaizen teams (2018 awards) and 7 Kobetsu Kaizen teams (2017 awards) are used. The AHP method is used to determine the criteria weights. In the award-ranking phase, integrated AHP-GRA and AHP-TOPSIS methods are used. The sensitivity analyzes are performed, as well. It is observed that the method applied by the evaluators in face-to-face meeting will give different results, than the method applied according to the mathematical method and this will indirectly affect the award ranking results in terms of equity and fairness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Garengo, P.: A performance measurement system for SMEs taking part in Quality Award Programmes. Total Qual. Manag. 20(1), 91–105 (2009)
Aydin, S., Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ.: A new fuzzy multicriteria decision making approach: an application for European Quality Award assessment. Knowl.-Based Syst. 32, 37–46 (2012)
Zhu, X., Wang, F., Liang, C., Li, J., Sun, X.: Quality credit evaluation based on TOPSIS: evidence from air-conditioning market in China. Procedia Comput. Sci. 9, 1256–1262 (2012)
Wen, D., Lv, J., Chen, X., Dai, T.: A dynamic analysis on implementing performance excellence model: importance, achievement and correlations. Comput. Ind. Eng. 101, 338–351 (2016)
Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)
Kuo, Y., Yang, T., Huang, G.W.: The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 55(1), 80–93 (2008)
Lai, Y.J., Liu, T.Y., Hwang, C.L.: Topsis for MODM. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 76(3), 486–500 (1994)
Shyur, H.J., Shih, H.S.: A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Math. Comput. Model. 44(7–8), 749–761 (2006)
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our special thanks of gratitude to the General Secretary of KalDer, Senem Demirdamar Guner.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Albayrak, N., Kececi, B. (2020). Quality Circles and Kaizen Award Evaluation Process Improvement in KALDER: Application of Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques. In: Mrugalska, B., Trzcielinski, S., Karwowski, W., Di Nicolantonio, M., Rossi, E. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1216. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51981-0_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51981-0_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51980-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51981-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)