Abstract
In recent years, several kinds of machine learning tools have developed, each involving complex functions and tasks, which means usage knowledge varies between tools. Integrating the environment for effective AI machine learning can be regarded as a complicated task and may even consist of several separate tasks, such as building a test environment, data acquisition, data cleansing, machine learning training, and model management. In terms of the cognitive engineering approach, most tasks not only require knowledge-based cognitive control over skill-based or rule-based behaviours higher cognitive loads and workloads as well. Since complex knowledge and higher cognitive loads are required, the use of AI machine learning is limited and leads to ineffective work procedures. Thus, this research analysed the AI development process via various methods of cognitive task analysis in order to identify which tasks induce cognitive workload. Then, a new integrated AI development system was created, which was expected to reduce the number of ineffective tasks and workload. Experiments were conducted twice to validate the system’s effectiveness, and the results indicate that there were significant differences between the several different AI development tasks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Vicente, K.J., Rasmussen, J.: A theoretical framework for ecological interface design (1988)
Rasmussen, J., Mark Pejtersen, A., Goodstein, L.P.: Cognitive Systems Engineering. Wiley, New York (1994)
Rasmussen, J.: Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3, 257–266 (1983)
Reason, J.: Framework models of human performance and error: a consumer guide. In: Tasks, Errors, and Mental Models, pp. 35–49. Taylor & Francis, Inc., March 1988
Hart, S.G.: NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 904–908. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, October 2006
Lintern, G.: Tutorial: work domain analysis (2011)
Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. CRC Press (1999)
Drivalou, S.: Supporting critical operational conditions in an electricity distribution control room through ecological interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Conference on European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 263–270 (2005)
Rasmussen, J.: Outlines of a hybrid model of the process plant operator. In: Monitoring Behavior and Supervisory Control, pp. 371–383. Springer, Boston (1976)
Rasmussen, J.: Models of mental strategies in process plant diagnosis. In: Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures, pp. 241–258. Springer, Boston (1981)
Mcllroy, R.C., Stanton, N.A.: Eco-Driving: From Strategies to Interfaces. CRC Press (2017)
Grier, R.A.: How high is high? A meta-analysis of NASA-TLX global workload scores. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1727–1731. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, September 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Park, D., Park, H., Song, S. (2020). Designing the AI Developing System Through Ecological Interface Design. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1217. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51827-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51828-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)