Skip to main content

Ergonomic Assessment of the Lifting Tasks Performed by North Indian Workers in LPG Cylinder Distribution Supply Chain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Ergonomics (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1215))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Lifting is considered as the most stressful activity in manual material handling and leads to musculoskeletal disorders. The present work was performed to evaluate the lifting index and the risk of low back pain among workers involved in lifting of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinder. 40 workers working in 3 modes of transportation of liquefied petroleum gas cylinders in north India were investigated with the help of the NIOSH lifting equation. The results revealed that 100% of the workers have performed under different levels of risk as their LI > 1. 22.5% were under low risk, 32.5% of workers were under medium risk and 45% of the workers were under high risk. The present work reveals that there is a need to redesign the lifting tasks by reducing the horizontal distance of lifting of cylinders and reducing the weight of the cylinder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brinham, C., Garg, A.: The role of biomechanical job evaluation in the reduction of overexertion injuries. In: 23rd Annual American Industrial Hygienists Association Conference, pp. 138–144. American Industrial Hygiene Association Press, Fairfax (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chaffin, J., Page, G.: Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight lifting limits. Ergonomics 37, 663–676 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaffin, D.B.: Primary prevention of low back pain through the application of biomechanics in manual materials handling tasks. GItal Med LavErgon 27(1), 40–50 (2005). The University of Michigan, USA, Ann Arbor 8109-2117

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dempsey, P., Fathallah, F.: Application issues and theoretical concerns regarding the 1991 NIOSH equation asymmetry multiplier. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 23, 181–191 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elfeituri, F., Taboun, S.: The effects of working in restricted workspaces on lifting Capacity. In: Lee, G. (ed.) Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety, pp. 95–100. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gerri, F., Mani, L.: Work-related low back pain prim care. Primary Care: Clin. Office Pract. 27(4), 865–876 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Genaidy, A., Karwowski, W., Christensen, D., Vogiatzis, C., Deraisheh, N., Prins, A.: What is ‘heavy’? Ergonomics 41, 420–432 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hidalgo, J., Genaidy, A., Karwowski, W., Christensen, D., Huston, R., Stambough, J.: A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting. Ergonomics 38, 2455–2464 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hidalgo, J., Genaidy, A., Karwowski, W., Christensen, D., Huston, R., Stambough, J.: A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation. Ergonomics 40, 916–927 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Honsa, K., Vennettilli, M., Mott, N., Silvera, D., Niechwiej, E., Wagar, S., et al.: The efficacy of the NIOSH (1991) hand-to-container coupling factor. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Human Factors Association of Canada, pp. 158–253. Human Factors Association of Canada, Calgary (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jager, M., Luttmann, A.: A critical survey on the biomechanical criterion in the NIOSH method for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 23, 331–337 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karwowski, W.: Comments on the assumption of the multiplicity of risk factors in the draft revisions of the NIOSH lifting guide. In: Kumar, S. (ed.) Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and SAFETY IV, pp. 905–910. Taylor & Francis, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marras, W.S., Karwowski, W. (eds.): The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook, pp. 1063–1074. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karwowski, W., Pongpatanasuegsa, N.: Linguistic interpretation in the human categorization of load heaviness. In: Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, pp. 425–427. Taylor & Francis, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leskinen, T., Haijanen, J.: Torque on the low back and the weight limits recommended by NIOSH in simulated lifts. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on 3-D Analysis of Human Movement (session 4, paper no. 7). Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, K.S., Park, H.S., Chun, K.S.: The validity of the revised NIOSH weight limit in a Korean young male population: a psychophysical approach. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 18(2–3), 181–186 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mital, A.: Maximum weight of lift acceptable to male and female industrial workers for extended work shifts. Ergonomics 27, 1115–1126 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mital, A., Ramakrishnan, A.: A comparison of literature-based design recommendations and experimental capability data for complex manual materials handling activity. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 24, 73–80 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung, M.K., Kee, D.: Evaluation of lifting tasks frequently performed during fire brick manufacturing processes using NIOSH lifting equations. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 25(4), 423–433 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nussbaum, M., Chaffin, D., Page, G.: A biomechanical investigation of the asymmetric multiplier in the revised NIOSH lifting equation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, pp. 709–713. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Norrish, A., Cryer, P.: Work-related injury in New Zealand commercial Fishermen. Br. J. Ind. Med. 47, 726–732 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Snook, S., Ciriello, V.: The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics 34, 1197–1213 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaswan, M.S., Rathi, R., Singh, M.: Just in time elements extraction and prioritization for health care unit using a decision-making approach. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 36, 1243–1263 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Waters, T., Putz-Anderson, V., et al.: Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36, 749–776 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahender Singh Kaswan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kapur, S., Kaswan, M.S. (2020). Ergonomic Assessment of the Lifting Tasks Performed by North Indian Workers in LPG Cylinder Distribution Supply Chain. In: Karwowski, W., Goonetilleke, R., Xiong, S., Goossens, R., Murata, A. (eds) Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1215. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51549-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51549-2_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51548-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51549-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics