Skip to main content

Large-Scale Group Consensus Decision-Making Methods with DHHFLPRs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Double Hierarchy Linguistic Term Set and Its Extensions

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 396))

Abstract

With the rapid development of society and the increasingly complex economic environment, management and decision-making tasks are becoming more and more difficult. Meanwhile, with the progress of science and technology and the development of network environment, the communications between people are increasingly convenient. Therefore, large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) has become the focus of decision-making problems. Generally, a GDM problem can be called LSGDM problem when the number of experts is more than 20 (Liu and Chen 2006). Now LSGDM are very commonly encountered in actual life, especially in the era of data (Labella, 2018; Liu et al. 2014a, b, a, b, c; 2016; Palomares et al. 2014a, b; Quesada et al. 2015; Wu and Liu 2016; Wu and Xu 2018; Xu et al. 2015; Zhang 2018; Zhang et al. 2018). Basically, large-scale problems in decision making, consensus reaching, voting, social choice etc. call for the use of sophisticated computational tools, analysis of computational efficiency of algorithm, etc. This is done by the so called computational social choice (Brandt et al. 2016; Chevalayre et al. 2007). These works are mathematically and algorithmically very sophisticated. Specially, in this chapter, the concept of a large-scale group consensus decision making related problem is not meant here in the sense of computational social choice and related areas (Brandt et al. 2016; Chevalayre et al. 2007). And the purpose of this chapter is to research the large-scale group consensus reaching methods based on DHHFLPRs. Firstly, because the clustering and the consensus reaching process are two important constituent parts, we will discuss the clustering method and the consensus reaching process in LSGDM with DHHFLPRs, propose a large-scale group consensus decision-making method and apply this method to the assessments of water resources in some cities of Sichuan province. Additionally, by constructing new clustering method and consensus model, and from the perspective of in-depth analyzing minority opinions and non-cooperative behaviors in LSGDM, this chapter puts forward a novel large-scale group consensus decision-making method based on DHHFLPRs, which is more in line with human cognition, and applies this method to the comprehensive assessments of the causes of haze formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brandt F, Conitzer V, Endriss U, Lang J, Procaccia AD (2016) Handbook of computational social choice. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevaleyre Y, Endriss U, Lang J, Maudet N (2007) A short introduction to computational social choice. In: van Leeuwen J, Italiano GF, van der Hoek W, Meinel C, Sack H, Plášil F (2007) SOFSEM 2007: Theory and practice of computer science. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4362, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 51–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Da QL, Liu XW (1999) Interval number linear programming and the satisfactory solution. Syst Eng Theor Pract 19:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2018) Consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowl-Based Syst 157:20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Liao HC, Herrera F (2020) A consensus model to manage minority opinions and noncooperative behaviors in large-scale GDM with double hierarchy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.2985069

  • Hao ZN, Xu ZS, Zhao H, Fujita H (2018) A dynamic weight determination approach based on the intuitionistic fuzzy Bayesian network and its application to emergency decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(4):1893–1907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu HM, Chen CT (1996) Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(3):279–285

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Labella Á, Liu Y, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2018) Analyzing the performance of classical consensus models in largescale group decision making: a comparative study. Appl Soft Comput 67:677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee LS (2000) Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 132(3):303–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstone H, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Chen XH (2006) Improved clustering algorithm and its application in complex huge group decision-making. J Syst Eng Electron 28:1695–1699

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Huo TF, Liao PC, Gong J, Xue B (2015a) A group decision-making aggregation model for contractor selection in large scale construction projects based on two-stage partial least squares (PLS) path modeling. Group Decis Negot 24:855–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Shen YH, Chen Y, Chen XH, Chen Y, Wang XQ (2015b) A two-layer weight determination method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision making experts in a linguistic environment. Inf Fusion 23:156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Shen YH, Chen XH, Chen Y, Wang XQ (2014a) A partial binary tree DEA-DA cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision making problems. Inf Fusion 18(1):119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Shen YH, Chen XH, Sun H, Chen Y (2014b) A complex multi-attribute large-group PLS decision-making method in the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl Math Model 38:4512–4527

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Shen YH, Zhang W, Chen XH, Wang XQ (2015c) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 245(1):209–225

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Fan ZP, Zhang X (2016) A method for large group decision making based on evaluation information provided by participators from multiple groups. Inf Fusion 29(C):132–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomares I, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014a) A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(3):516–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares I, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014b) MENTOR: A graphical monitoring tool of preferences evolution in large-scale group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 58:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang Q, Wang H, Xu ZS (2016) Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 369:128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesada FJ, Palomares I, Martínez L (2015) Managing experts behavior in large-scale consensus reaching processes with uninorm aggregation operators. Appl Soft Comput 35:873–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R, Ganesh LS (1994) Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages. Eur J Oper Res 79(2):249–265

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu T, Liu XW (2016) An interval type-2 fuzzy clustering solution for large-scale multiple-criteria group decision-making problems. Knowl-Based Syst 114:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZB, Xu JP (2018) A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Inf Fusion 41:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52:395–407

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong CQ, Li DH, Jin LH (2008) Group consistency analysis for protecting the minority view. Syst Eng Theory Pract 10:102–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2009) An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 56(4):1369–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XH, Zhang LY, Wan QF (2012) A variation coefficient similarity measure and its application in emergency group decision-making. Syst Eng Procedia 5:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XH, Du ZJ, Chen XH (2015) Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decis Support Syst 79:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue ZL (2011) An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision experts with interval numbers. Knowl-Based Syst 24(1):146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue ZL (2012) Approach to group decision making based on determining the weights of experts by using projection method. Appl Math Model 36(7):2900–2910

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2001) Penalizing strategic preference manipulation in multi-agent decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 9(3):393–403

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XL (2018) A novel probabilistic linguistic approach for large-scale group decision making with incomplete weight information. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20:2245–2256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Consensus building for the heterogeneous LSGDM with the individual concerns and satisfactions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(2):884–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Zhang ST, Chen Y, Zhang LL (2016) A hierarchical clustering approach based on three-dimensional gray relational analysis for clustering a large group of decision makers with double information. Group Decis Negot 25(2):325–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xunjie Gou .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gou, X., Xu, Z. (2021). Large-Scale Group Consensus Decision-Making Methods with DHHFLPRs. In: Double Hierarchy Linguistic Term Set and Its Extensions. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 396. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51320-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics