Negotiating an Inefficient Market: An Agent-Based Model Approach to Property Insurance Claim Negotiations

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1206)


Escalating frequency and severity of natural disasters in America has necessitated the study of property insurance claim settlement processes. To date, such research has been limited by a lack of publicly available claim settlement data. This paper takes an initial step in resolving that problem by developing an agent-based model simulating negotiation between insurance companies and restoration vendors. We examine the role that macro level constraints on micro behavior play in settlement outcomes. While we find that employee performance metrics enforced by hierarchical insuring corporations influence settlement values downward, we also find that vendor flexibility mitigates such biases. Thus, evidence suggests that facilitating cooperative relationships among these competing entities is essential to minimizing valuation discrepancy and expediting the disaster recovery process.


Insurance Claims Restoration Negotiation Agent-based model 


  1. 1.
    Bazerman, M.H., Neale, M.A.: Improving negotiation effectiveness under final offer arbitration: the role of selection and training. J. Appl. Psychol. 67(5), 543 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cioffi-Revilla, C.: Introduction to Computational Social Science. Springer, London and Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dooley, K.: Simulation research methods. In: Companion to Organizations, pp. 829–848 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.: Simulation for the Social Scientist. McGraw-Hill Education, London (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Kochan, T.A.: Collective bargaining and industrial relations: from theory to policy and practice. RD Irwin (1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Railsback, S.F., Grimm, V.: Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2019)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thaler, R.: Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1(1), 39–60 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walton, R.E., McKersie, R.B.: A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of Asocial Interaction System. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilensky: Netlogo (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Claremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA
  2. 2.La Sierra UniversityRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations