Skip to main content

Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge of Soil Regulation Services, and Factors Effecting Decision-Making in Agricultural Landscapes in the Terai Plains of Nepal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations and Interdisciplinary Solutions for Underserved Areas (InterSol 2020)

Abstract

Rapid degradation of soil regulation services is a growing concern for agricultural producers worldwide, with the potential for adverse impacts on agricultural productivity, food security, and livelihoods. Yet, data integrating observations of soil nutrient and physical status with farmers’ knowledge of soil fertility is lacking, while landscape-level empirical assessments remain limited. In this paper, it is argued that a deeper understanding of the benefits and trade-offs of management practices currently employed by farmers to secure soil nutrients could help to promote improvements in natural resource management, agricultural productivity and efficiency. Using the case of the Central and Western Terai Plains of Nepal in 2012–2014, rice-cultivated soil parameters were estimated, and 354 respondents were interviewed to determine the cropping systems, soil nutrient status and risks, indigenous soil classification systems, and key biophysical, institutional, economic and risk perception factors effecting decision-making. Findings reveal farmers are acutely aware of the main causes of soil degradation and until today, these issues continue to be of critical importance. To counter this degradation, farmers employ a diversity of landscape-level practices to secure optimal crop yields and soil nutrients. However, farmers have limited access to agricultural extension services and scientific monitoring and apply fewer mineral fertilisers than previously reported. Additional investments are required to optimize farmers’ practices and soil regulation services, such as cooperation for knowledge innovation systems, public/private extension, organisation for co-management, integrated nutrient management, and private forestry on farms. The case illustrates local knowledge and incremental efforts to adapt to emerging risks remain the foundation to implement spatially targeted conservation measures and design adaptive land use plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Permissions to conduct the fieldwork from local communities were obtained, objectives were stated upfront to ensure respondents understood the purpose of the use of the information, and confidentiality/anonymity was ensured. Access to study sites was facilitated through NARC and a local organisation Friends Service Council Nepal, with ethical permissions rendered by the University of Oxford.

  2. 2.

    For example, vegetables grown in the study area include potato, cauliflower, beans, cabbage, tomato, onion, ladyfinger, bitter guard, cucumber, bottle guard, carrot, lemon, garlic, peppermint, sunflower, chilli and coriander.

  3. 3.

    For example, the Gold Standard Biogas Voluntary Emissions Reduction pilot project, implemented by WWF since 2015, and the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation plus (REDD+) readiness process was implemented by the Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation and others since 2010.

References

  1. Ramankutty, N., Mehrabi, Z., Waha, K.: Trends in global agricultural land use: implications for environmental health and food security. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 789–815 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, M., Tilman, D.: Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 064016 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. FAO, WFP, and IFAD: The state of food insecurity in the world 2012. FAO, Rome (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Willis, K.J., Gillson, L., Knapp, S.: Biodiversity hotspots through time: an introduction. Philosoph. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B 362, 169–174 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. FAO: The role of agriculture in the development of Least-Developed Countries and their integration into the world economy. Commodities and Trade Division. Rome, FAO (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pingali, P.L.: Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States of America 109(31), 12302–12308 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives: Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture. Singh Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal, His Majesty’s Government, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Agribusiness Promotion and Statistics Division (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Government of Nepal: National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) to Climate Change. Kathmandu, Nepal, Ministry of Environment (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhandari, B.S., Grant, M.: Analysis of livelihood security: a case study in the Kali-Khola watershed of Nepal. J. Environ. Manag. 85, 17–26 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maskey, N.L., Bhattarai, S., Peoples, M.B., Herridge, D.F.: On-farm measurements of nitrogen fixation by winter and summer legumes in the Hill and Terai regions of Nepal. Field Crops Res. 70, 209–221 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Desbiez, A., Matthews, R., Tripathi, B., Ellis-Jones, J.: Perceptions and assessment of soil fertility by farmers in the Mid-Hills of Nepal. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 103, 191–206 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Government of Nepal: Agriculture district summary National Census 2011/12. Kathmandu, National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Devkotaa, S., Upadhyay, M.P.: Agricultural productivity and poverty reduction in Nepal. Faculty of Research and Creativity 6 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joshi, K.D., Conroy, C., Witcombe, J.R.: Agriculture, seed, and innovation in Nepal: Industry and policy issues for the future. Washington D.C, International Food Policy Research Institute (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dixon, A.: World Bank can help build Kathmandu-Terai fast track. The Kathmandu Post. Kathmandu, Ekantipur (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bista, D.B.: Fatalism and Development: Nepal’s Struggle for Modernisation. Sangam Books Ltd., Kathmandu (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shrestha, B., Maskey, S.L., Shrestha, R.K., Tripathi, B.P., Khadka, Y.G., Munankarmi, R.C., et al.: Soil fertility management: farmers’ practices and perception in the hills of Nepal. Lumle Technical Paper No. 2000/4. Pokhara, Lumle Agriculture Research Station (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ghimire, L.S.: Main problem is design stage of foreign aid projects in Nepal. New Spotlight New Magazine. Kathmandu. 8 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Illukpitiya, P., Gopalakrishnan, C.: Decision-making in soil conservation: application of a behavioural model to potato farmers in Sri Lanka. Land Use Policy 21(4), 321–331 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ali, M.: Quantifying the socio-economic determinants of sustainable crop production: an application to wheat cultivation in the Terai of Nepal. Agricult. Econ. 14, 45–60 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shreshtra, G.: Role of legume intercropping in sustainable farming in Mid-Hills of Nepal. Third SAS-N Convention, Kathmandu (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sah, G., Shah, S.C., Sah, S.K., Thapa, R.B., McDonald, A., Sidhu, H.S., et al.: Tillage, crop residue and nitrogen level effects on soil properties and crop yields under rice-wheat system in the Terai region of Nepal. Global J. Biol. Agricult. Health Sci. 3(3), 139–147 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vignola, R., Koellner, T., Scholz, R.W., McDaniels, T.L.: Decision-making by farmers regarding ecosystem services: factors affecting soil conservation efforts in Costa Rica. Land Use Pol. 27(4), 1132–1142 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lamarque, P., Artaux, A., Barnaud, C., Dobremez, L., Nettier, B., Lavorel, S.: Taking into account farmers’ decision-making to map fine-scale land management adaptation to climate and socio-economic scenarios. Landscape and Urban Planning 119(Supplement C), 147–157 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tamang, D.: Indigenous soil fertility management in the Jhihku Khola watershed: soil fertility and erosion issues in the middle mountains of Nepal. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Jhikhu Kola Watershed, Nepal (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tamang, D.: Indigenous soil fertility management in the hills of Nepal: lessons from an east–west transect. Report No. 19, Kathmandu, HMG Ministry of Agriculture/Winrock International Research (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pilbeam, C.J., Mathema, S.B., Gregory, P.J., Shakya, P.B.: Soil fertility management in the Mid-Hills of Nepal: practices and perceptions. Agricult. Hum. Values 22(2), 243–258 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paudel, K.C.: Implication of forage and livestock production on soil fertility. FAO, Rome (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thapa, B., Walker, D.H., Sinclair, F.L.: Indigenous knowledge of the feeding value of tree fodder. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 67, 97–114 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Uddin, K., Murthy, M.S.R., Wahid, S.M., Matin, M.A.: Estimation of soil erosion dynamics in the Koshi Basin using GIS and remote sensing to assess priority areas for conservation. PLoS ONE 11(3), e0150494 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lumbini Crane Conservation Centre: Lumbini crane conservation centre (2011). http://lumbinicrane.org. Accessed 26 Dec 2011

  32. Pariyar, D.: Nepal Country Pasture/Forage Resource Profiles. FAO, Rome (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Government of Nepal: Nepal Census of Agriculture 2001/2 (2002). http://www.cbs.gov.np. Accessed 26 Dec 2014

  34. Malla, G.: Climate change and its impact on Nepalese agriculture: review paper. J. Agricult. Environ. 9, 62–71 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rana, R.B., Garforth, C., Sthapit, B., Jarvis, D.: Influence of socio-economic and cultural factors in rice varietal diversity management on-farm in Nepal. Agricult. Hum. Values 24(4), 461–472 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Larson, W.E.: The dynamics of soil quality as a measure of sustainable management. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. In: Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F., Stewart, B.A. (eds.) Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA, vol. 35, pp. 7–51 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kim, H.-J., Kenneth, A.S., Hummel, J.W.: Soil macronutrient sensing for precision agriculture. J. Environ. Model. 11, 1810–1824 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Paudel, B.R., Udawatta, R.P., Kremer, R.J., Anderson, S.H.: Soil quality indicator responses to row crop, grazed pasture, and agroforestry buffer management. Agrofor. Syst. 84(2), 311–323 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. van der Ploeg, J.D.: Peasant-driven agricultural growth and food sovereignty. J. Peasant Stud. 41, 999–1030 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bewket, W.: Soil and water conservation intervention with conventional technologies in northwestern highlands of Ethiopia: acceptance and adoption by farmers. Land Use Policy 24(2), 404–416 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Grothmann, T., Patt, A.: Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 199–213 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wossink, A., Swinton, S.M.: Jointness in production and farmers’ willingness to supply non-marketed ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 64(2), 297–304 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Thorn, J.P.R.: Adaptation ‘‘from below’’ to changes in species distribution, habitat and climate in agro-ecosystems in the Terai Plains of Nepal. Ambio 48, 1482–1497 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dahal, G.R.: Community forestry in Nepal: Decentralized forest governance. Lessons from forest decentralization, London, Earthscan, pp. 67–81 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Carson, B.: The land, the farmer and the future: a soil fertility management strategy for Nepal. ICIMOD Occasional Paper No. 21. Kathmandu, International Centre for Mountain Development (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sharpe, R.R., Harper, L.A., Giddens, J.E., Langdale, G.W.: Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen budget for conservation tilled wheat. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 86, 1394–1398 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  47. FAO: Agricultural extension services in Nepal. Pulchok, FAO (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Thorn, J.P.R.: Ecosystem services, biodiversity and human wellbeing along climatic gradients in smallholder agro-ecosystems in the Terai Plains of Nepal and Northern Ghana. DPhil, University of Oxford (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vermeulen, S.J., Challinor, A.J., Thornton, P.K., Campbell, B.M., Eriyagama, N., Vervoort, J.M., et al.: Addressing uncertainty in adaptation planning for agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110(21), 8357–8362 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Thorn, J.P.R., Thornton, T.F., Helfgott, A., Willis, K.J.: Indigenous uses of wild and tended plant biodiversity maintain ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes of the Terai Plains of Nepal. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine (in review)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Prasad, R.B., Brooke, R.M.: Effect of varying maize densities on intercropped maize and soybean in Nepal. Expl. Agric. 41, 365–382 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Diwakar, J., Prasai, T., Pant, S.R., Jayana, B.L.: Study on major pesticides and fertilisers used in Nepal. Sci. World 6(6) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Brunner, S.H., Grêt-Regamey, A.: Policy strategies to foster the resilience of mountain social-ecological systems under uncertain global change. Environ. Sci. Policy 66, 129–139 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Dale, V.H., Polasky, S.: Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 64(2), 286–296 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  55. McDowell, C., Sparks, R.: Multivariate modeling and prediction of farmer’s conservation behaviour towards natural ecosystems. J. Environ. Manage. 28, 185–210 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tiwari, K.R., Sitaula, B.K., Nyborg, I.L.P., Paudel, G.S.: Determinants of farmers’ adoption of improved soil conservation technology in a middle mountain watershed of Central Nepal. Environ. Manage. 42(2), 210–222 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Leyva, J.C., Martinez, J.A.F., Gonzalez-Roa, M.C.: Analysis of the adoption of soil conservation practices in olive groves: the case of mountainous areas in Southern Spain. Spanish J. Agricult. Res. 5(3), 249–258 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ervin, D.E.: Constraints to practicing soil conservation: land tenure relationships. Conserving Soil: Insights from Socioeconomic Research. S.B. Lovejoy, and T. L. Napier. Ankeny, Iowa, Soil Conservation Society of America (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Martin, H.T., Santos, E.P.: Comparison of indigenous and scientific knowledge on soil classification among farmers in Imhugan, Nueva Vizcaya, Phillipines. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. Spec. Issue 2, 71–83 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Khadka, D., et al.: Assessment of soil fertility status and preparation of their maps in National Wheat Research Program (NWRP), Bhairahawa. In: Conference Proceedings (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Shrestha, R.K.: Soil fertility status of rice field in Paundi watershed, Lamjung District, Nepal. Am. J. Agricult. Forestry 3(3), 120–123 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gowing, J., Payton, R., Tenywa, M.: Integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge on soils: recent experiences in Uganda and Tanzania and their relevance to participatory land use planning. Uganda J. Agricult. Sci. 9, 184–191 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang, Y., Babu, S.C.: Knowledge driven development: private extension and global lessons. Public Policy and Global Development (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shikuku, K., et al.: Support farmer-to-farmer and community-wide social learning. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Cali. CO. (2017). 4 p.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Nkegbe, P.K., Shankar, S.: Adoption intensity of soil and water conservation practices by smallholders: evidence from Northern Ghana. Bio-based Appl. Econ. 3(2), 159–174 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lipper, L., Mann, W., Meybeck, A., Sessa, R.: “Climate-smart” agriculture: policies, practices and financing for food security, adaptation and mitigation. Rome, FAO (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  67. David, S.: Learning to think for ourselves: knowledge improvement and social benefits among farmer field school participants in Cameroon. J. Int. Agricult. Extension Educ. 14, 2 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Scherr, S.J., McNeely, J.A.: Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of ‘eco-agriculture’ landscapes. Philosoph. Trans. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 363(1491), 477–494 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  69. WWF Nepal: Annual report 2016. Kathmandu, Nepal WWF (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Acharya, K.P.: Linking trees on farms with biodiversity conservation in subsistence farming systems in Nepal. Biodivers. Conserv. 15(2), 631–646 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wang, C., Maclaren, V.: Evaluation of economic and social impacts of the sloping land conversion program: a case study in Dunhua County. China. Forest Policy Econ. 14(1), 50–57 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mattison, E.H.A., Norris, K.: Bridging the gaps between agricultural policy, land-use and biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20(11), 610–616 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Butsic, V., Kuemmerle, T.: Using optimization methods to align food production and biodiversity conservation beyond land sharing and land sparing. Ecol. Appl. 25(3), 589–595 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  74. World Bank: Poverty headcount ratio at $3.10 a day (2016). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.2DAY?locations=NP. Accessed 7 Dec 2016

  75. Braimoh, A.K.: Integrating indigenous knowledge and soil science to develop a national soil classification system for Nigeria. Agric. Hum. Values 19, 75–80 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the farmers who took part in the survey, particularly Bhim Chaudhury, Rhada Chaudhury, Mangu Chaudhury, Shem Narayan Chaudhary, Laksmi Chaudhury, Jhup Lal Bhudhathoki, Chandra Kumari Mahata, Hiramati Grau, Kopila Paudel, the Garima Farmers’ Cooperative and Sagarmatha’s Women’s Group. Research assistance was provided by Anita Bake, Dev Kala Dumre, Renu Shakya, Binay Mahargen, Sindhu Sapkota, Raju Acharey, Dharma Raj Ghimre and Asma K.C. Thanks are due to the advisory support of Thomas F. Thornton, Kathy J. Willis and Ariella Helfgott and the comments of anonymous reviewers. Friends Service Council Nepal and Nepal Agricultural Research Council provided in-country institutional support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica P. R. Thorn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

This work was supported by Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) research program on Systemic Integrated Adaptation of the Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research, the Long-term Ecology and Resource Stewardship Lab, and Merton College at the University of Oxford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thorn, J.P.R. (2020). Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge of Soil Regulation Services, and Factors Effecting Decision-Making in Agricultural Landscapes in the Terai Plains of Nepal. In: Thorn, J., Gueye, A., Hejnowicz, A. (eds) Innovations and Interdisciplinary Solutions for Underserved Areas. InterSol 2020. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 321. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51051-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51051-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51050-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51051-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics