Skip to main content

Cognitive Dynamics of Gender in Individuals’ Activity Goal Classification and Formation Process, Activity Strategy and Decision Outcome Expectation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1201))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1153 Accesses

Abstract

This study explored and empirically determined the influence of gender in the goal classification and goal formation processes of individuals, as well as on their considerations of activity strategy and decision outcome expectations in an exam organizational activity. Data was collected from male and female graduate students preparing for end-of-semester examinations and comparatively analyzed inferentially. It is found that by segregating gender, the cognitive dynamics of male and female students when preparing for an exam organizational activity, in terms of their individual goal classification and goal formation processes, as well as their considerations of activity strategy and decision outcome expectations, differ in perceptual orientation. It is concluded that the cognitive dynamics of male and female individuals’ when preparing for an organizational activity, in terms of their individual goal classification and goal formation processes, as well as their considerations of activity strategy and decision outcome expectations differ in their perceptual orientations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sanda, M.A.: Dynamics of goal characterization in students’ exams-preparation systemic activity transition processes. Theor. Issues Ergon. 21(1), 112–130 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maccoby, E.E., Jacklin, C.N.: The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maclntyre, T.: Gender differences in cognition: a minefield of research issues. Irish J. Psychol. 18(4), 386–396 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hyde, J.S.: Gender similarities and differences. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65, 373–398 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reynolds, M.R., Scheiber, C., Hajovsky, D.B., Schwartz, B., Kaufman, A.K.: Gender differences in academic achievement: is writing an exception to the gender similarities hypothesis? J. Genet. Psychol. 176(4), 211–234 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marmaras, N., Nathanael, D.: Cognitive engineering practice: melting theory into reality. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 6(2), 109–127 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanda, M.A.: Mediating subjective task complexity in job design: a critical reflection of historicity in self-regulatory activity. In: Carryl, B. (ed.) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering, pp. 340–350. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sanda, M.A., Johansson, J., Johansson, B., Abrahamsson, L.: Using systemic structural activity approach in identifying strategies enhancing human performance in mining production drilling activity. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 15(3), 262–282 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 57(9), 705–717 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Locke, E.A.: Purpose without consciousness: a contradiction. Psychol. Rep. 25, 991–1009 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bedny, G.Z., Karwowski, W.: A Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity: Applications to Human Performance and Work Design. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanda, M.A.: Cognitive and emotional-motivational implications in the job design of digitized production drilling in deep mines. In: Hale, K.S., Stanney, K.M. (eds.) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 488, pp. 211–222. Springer, Switzerland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dalal, D.K., Diab, D.L., Zhu, X.S., Hwang, T.: Understanding the construct of maximizing tendency: a theoretical and empirical evaluation. J. Behav. Decis. Making. 28, 437–450 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed-Aminu Sanda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sanda, MA. (2021). Cognitive Dynamics of Gender in Individuals’ Activity Goal Classification and Formation Process, Activity Strategy and Decision Outcome Expectation. In: Ayaz, H., Asgher, U. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1201. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51041-1_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics