Advertisement

Fidget Spinners May Decrease Prefrontal Cortex Activity During Cognitively Challenging Fine Motor Tasks

  • Reza KoilerEmail author
  • Elham Bakhshipour
  • Austin Schimmel
  • Andrez Jones
  • Kimberlly Milla
  • Patricia A. Shewokis
  • Nancy Getchell
Conference paper
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1201)

Abstract

Despite increasing popularity, media attention, and commercial success of fidget spinners, scientific evidence on their effectiveness is scarce. The purpose of this study was to explore how fidget spinners affect fine motor performance and its neural correlates in the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC). Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to examine the PFC activity while a group of healthy adult participants completed five different sub-tasks of the Purdue Pegboard Task (PPT). In this study, fidget spinners resulted in a significant decrease in ΔHbO compared to the controls during performance of the more cognitively demanding assembly subtask despite no differences in behavioral output. No other main effects for group existed in the other sub-tasks, although significant group by block interactions occurred in all four brain regions. This finding suggests that fidget spinners may reduce the cognitive load on LDLPFC during a cognitively challenging fine motor task.

Keywords

Fidget spinner fNIRS ADHD Fine motor 

References

  1. 1.
    Mehrabian, A., Friedman, S.L.: An analysis of fidgeting and associated individual differences. J. Pers. 54(2), 406–429 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. G.: The measure of fidget. Nature 32(817), 174–175 (1885)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gawrilow, C., Kühnhausen, J., Schmid, J., Stadler, G.: Hyperactivity and motoric activity in ADHD: Characterization, assessment, and intervention. Front. Psychiatry, 5, 171 (2014). Frontiers Research FoundationGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seli, P., Carriere, J.S.A., Thomson, D.R., Cheyne, J.A., Martens, K.A.E., Smilek, D.: Restless mind, restless body. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 40(3), 660–668 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carriere, J.S.A., Seli, P., Smilek, D.: Wandering in both mind and body: Individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 67(1), 19–31 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farley, J., Risko, E.F., Kingstone, A.: Everyday attention and lecture retention: the effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering. Front. Psychol. 4, 619 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gligorić, N., Uzelac, A., Krco, S.: Smart classroom: real-time feedback on lecture quality. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, PERCOM Workshops 2012, pp. 391–394 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pine, K.J., Bird, H., Kirk, E.: The effects of prohibiting gestures on children’s lexical retrieval ability. Dev. Sci. 10(6), 747–754 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarver, D.E., Rapport, M.D., Kofler, M.J., Raiker, J.S., Friedman, L.M.: Hyperactivity in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): impairing deficit or compensatory behavior? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 43(7), 1219–1232 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hartanto, T.A., Krafft, C.E., Iosif, A.M., Schweitzer, J.B.: A trial-by-trial analysis reveals more intense physical activity is associated with better cognitive control performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child Neuropsychol. 22(5), 618–626 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rapport, M.D., Bolden, J., Kofler, M.J., Sarver, D.E., Raiker, J.S., Alderson, R.M.: Hyperactivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a ubiquitous core symptom or manifestation of working memory deficits? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 37(4), 521–534 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Musall, S., Kaufman, M.T., Juavinett, A.L., Gluf, S., Churchland, A.K.: Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements. Nat. Neurosci. 22(10), 1677–1686 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daily chart - The fidget-spinner boom | Graphic detail | The Economist. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/09/08/the-fidget-spinner-boom. Accessed 13 Feb 2020
  14. 14.
    Impeachment trial: Senators use fidget spinners and stress balls to relieve boredom during Trump impeachment proceedings - CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-impeachment-trial-senators-fidget-spinners-relieve-boredom/. Accessed 12 Feb 2020
  15. 15.
    Schecter, R.A., Shah, J., Fruitman, K., Milanaik, R.L.: Fidget spinners: purported benefits, adverse effects and accepted alternatives. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 29(5), 616–618 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graziano, P.A., Garcia, A.M., Landis, T.D.: To fidget or not to fidget, that is the question: a systematic classroom evaluation of fidget spinners among young children with ADHD. J. Atten. Disord. 24(1), 163–171 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amico, G., Schaefer, S.: No evidence for performance improvements in episodic memory due to fidgeting, doodling or a ‘neuro-enhancing’ drink. J. Cogn. Enhanc. 4(1), 2–11 (2019)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soares, J.S., Storm, B.C.: Putting a negative spin on it: Using a fidget spinner can impair memory for a video lecture. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 34(1), 277–284 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohen, E.J., Bravi, R., Minciacchi, D.: The effect of fidget spinners on fine motor control. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 2–11 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahbub, M., et al.: A systematic review of diagnostic performance of quantitative tests to assess musculoskeletal disorders in hand-arm vibration syndrome. Ind. Health 53(5), 391–397 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lloyd-Fox, S., Blasi, A., Elwell, C.E.: Illuminating the developing brain: the past, present and future of functional near infrared spectroscopy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34(3), 269–284 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bakhshipour, E., Koiler, R., Milla, K., Getchell, N.: Understanding the Underlying Mechanisms of a Manual Dexterity Assessment using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 41, S26 (2019)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Milla, K., Bakhshipour, E., Bodt, B., Getchell, N.: Does movement matter? Prefrontal cortex activity during 2D vs. 3D performance of the tower of Hanoi puzzle. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 156 (2019)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ceja, K., Bakhshipour, E., Khoeilar, R., Getchell, N.: Does oxygenation of prefrontal cortex change in a two versus three-dimensional Tower of Hanoi task? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12 (2018)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koiler, R., Bakhshipour, E., Milla, K., Plumb, M., Getchell, N.: Understanding handwriting pauses in the detailed assessment of speed of handwriting test using fNIRs. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 41, S38 (2019)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P.A., Curtin, A., Izzetoglu, M., Izzetoglu, K., Onaral, B.: Using MazeSuite and functional near infrared spectroscopy to study learning in spatial navigation. J. Vis. Exp. 56, 3443 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shewokis, P.A., Shariff, F.U., Liu, Y., Ayaz, H., Castellanos, A., Lind, D.S.: Acquisition, retention and transfer of simulated laparoscopic tasks using fNIR and a contextual interference paradigm. Am. J. Surg. 213(2), 336–345 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    NCSS 2019 Statistical Software. NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA (2019)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kaller, C.P., Rahm, B., Spreer, J., Weiller, C., Unterrainer, J.M.: Dissociable contributions of left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in planning. Cereb. Cortex 21(2), 307–317 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reza Koiler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elham Bakhshipour
    • 1
  • Austin Schimmel
    • 1
  • Andrez Jones
    • 1
  • Kimberlly Milla
    • 2
  • Patricia A. Shewokis
    • 3
  • Nancy Getchell
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomechanics and Movement ScienceUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeuropsychologyKennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Nutrition Sciences Department, College of Nursing and Health Professions, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, School of EducationDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations