Abstract
Accurate speed control can effectively improve the efficiency of train operation. The advantages and disadvantages of the speed display form directly impact the interaction efficiency and the driver’s correct situational awareness of the train running state. Three kinds of train speedometer forms were designed, and the existing interface was compared with the three types. 28 subjects were selected to carry out four speed control experiments. The results showed that, the response time and accuracy performance were the highest in the case of color highlighting; the response time performance was higher but the accuracy performance was the lowest in the case of graph without numbers; the accuracy was higher but the response time was the lowest in the case of scale sparsity. This study shows that the speed display design should be give priority to color highlighting, while weighting the influences of number highlighting and scale sparsity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Vuchic, V.R.: Maintaining Performance with Full Automation, vol. 3, pp. 36–39 (2014)
Boles, D.B., Wickens, C.D.: Display formatting in information integration and nonintegration tasks. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 29(4), 395–406 (1987)
Payne, D.G., Lang, V.A., Blackwell, J.M.: Mixed versus pure display format in integration and nonintegration visual display monitoring tasks. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(3), 507–527 (1995)
Juanfang, Xu: Car dashboard interface design based on SEEV attention model. J. Mach. Design 12, 119–122 (2016)
Xu, J.: Analysis and Research on Cognitive Errors of Digital Interface Information by Eye Tracking. School of Mechanical Engineering Southeast University (2015)
Macwhinney, B., James, J.S.S., Schunn, C., et al.: TEP–a system for teaching experimental psychology using E-Prime. J. Behav. Res. Methods, Instrum. Comput. J. Psychon. Soc., Inc. 33(2), 287–296 (2001)
Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A. (eds.) The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1983)
Wu, X., Xue, C., Zhou, F.: An experimental study on visual search factors of information features in a task monitor-ing interface. In: 17th International Conference on Human- Computer Interaction, pp. 525–536. Springer Press, Los Angeles (2005)
Kruger, J.L., Hefer, E., Matthew, G.: Measuring the impact of subtitles on cognitive load: eye tracking and dynamic audio visual texts. In: Conference on Eye Tracking South Africa. ACM, pp. 67–71. ACM Press, South Africa (2013)
Goldberg, J.H., Kotval, X.P.: Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 24(6), 631–645 (1999)
Mayr, U., Kuhns, D., Rieter, M.: Eye movements reveal dynamics of task control. J. Exp. Psychol. Genera. 142(2), 489–509 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gao, C., Fang, W., Niu, K., Wang, J. (2020). Impact of Speedometer Forms on Integration Task Performance for Train Driving. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50942-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50943-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)