Advertisement

Performance in Mathematical and Scientific School Subjects as an Indicator of Success in Undergraduate Modules in Construction Economics in South Africa

Conference paper
  • 472 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1211)

Abstract

The Department of Construction Economics, University of Pretoria, South Africa offers a three-year BSc undergraduate program in Quantity Surveying (QS). Specific mathematical and scientific first year modules experience high failure rates that negatively impact throughput rates of students. To address this the department is considering intake cohorts with stronger academic ability in Mathematics and Natural Science. This study explores school performance in these school subjects versus performance in problematic modules from records of cohorts of 2010–2015. The Grade 12 marks of the cohort for Mathematics varied between 55% and 91% (average 73,2%; standard deviation 9,27). The Grade 12 marks for Natural Science varied between 41% and 82% (average 59,8%, standard deviation 9,34). The study found a relatively low correlation between performance in undergraduate modules and school subjects (r vary from 0.3950 to 0.4929). A stratified approach however indicated a constant, positive relationship. The slope of the best-fit regression lines for first year pass rate varied between 1,2669 and 2,122. Pass rate increased significantly with higher marks in Mathematics and Science. The slope for marks achieved was flatter at 0,493 to 0,794. Marks in undergraduate modules do increase with higher marks in Mathematics and Science, but at a slower rate.

Keywords

School subjects Undergraduate modules Construction Economics South Africa 

References

  1. 1.
    Council on Higher Education: Access and Throughput in South African Higher Education: Three Case Studies. Council on Higher Education, Pretoria (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher, G.: Improving Throughput in the Engineering Bachelor Degree – Report to the Engineering Council of South Africa (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mashige, K.P., Ramersad, N., Venkatas, I.S.: Do national senior certificate results predict first-year optometry students’ academic performance at university? South Afr. J. Higher Educ. 28(2), 550–563 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dennis, C.R., Murray, D.M.: Success in first-year Mathematics: School-leaving Examinations and First-year Performance. South Afr. J. Sci. 108(7/8) (2012). Art #1352, 3 pagesGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hunt, K., Ntuli, M., Rankin, N.A., Schöer, M., Sebastiao, C.: Comparability of NSC mathematic scores and former SC mathematic scores: how consistent is the signal across time? Educ. Change 15(1), 3–16 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barnes, H., Dzunsi, P., Wilkinson, A., Viljoen, M.: Researching the first-year accounting problem factors influencing success or failure of a South African higher education institution. J. New Gener. Sci. 7(2), 36–58 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Potgieter, M., Davidowitz, B.: Grade 12 achievement rating scales in the new national senior certificate as indicator of preparedness for tertiary chemistry. South Afr. J. Chem. 63, 75–82 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations