Advertisement

Novice and Experienced EAP Practitioners’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Teachers’ Cognitions and Students’ Perceptions

Conference paper
  • 486 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1211)

Abstract

The significance of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) has been accentuated since the late 1980s. However, evaluation of this knowledge from both teachers’ and students’ perspectives, especially in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) contexts has not received due attention. To shed more light on this topic, 200 undergraduates were invited to reflect, via a questionnaire, on four dimensions of their EAP teachers’ PCK. Meanwhile, four novice and experienced ELT (English Language Teaching) instructors and content teachers were interviewed to explore their cognition. The results of content analysis manifested noticeable discrepancies in the teachers’ cognitions. Results of a one-way ANOVA, on students’ questionnaire, revealed no significant difference between ELT instructors and content teachers. While students viewed both teachers as being Subject-Matter experts, they less positively assessed their mastery in other aspects of their PCK, which could imply the superiority of EAP teachers’ content expertise over their pedagogical knowledge.

Keywords

English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Teacher cognition 

References

  1. 1.
    Beijaard, D., Meijer, P.C., Morine-Dershimer, G., Tillema, H.: Teacher Professional Development In Changing Conditions. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ben-Peretz, M.: Teacher knowledge: what is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? Teach. Teach. Educ. 27(1), 3–9 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chauvot, J.B.: Grounding practice in scholarship, grounding scholarship in practice: knowledge of a mathematics teacher educator–researcher. Teach. Teach. Educ. 25(2), 357–370 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fraser, S.P.: Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): exploring its usefulness for science lecturers in higher education. Res. Sci. Educ. 46(1), 141–161 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J.: Frameworks for representing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Asia Pac. Forum on Sci. Learn. Teach. 4(2), 1–25 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atay, D., Kaslioglu, O., Kurt, G.: The pedagogical content knowledge development of prospective teachers through an experiential task. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(9), 1421–1425 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldschmidt, P., Phelps, G.: Does teacher professional development affect content and pedagogical knowledge: how much and for how long? Econ. Educ. Rev. 29(3), 432–439 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jang, S.J., Guan, S.Y., Hsieh, H.F.: Developing an instrument for assessing college students’ perceptions of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 1(1), 596–606 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evens, M., Elen, J., Depaepe, F.: Developing pedagogical content knowledge: lessons learned from intervention studies. Educ. Res. Int. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/790417. Article ID: 790417, 23 pages
  10. 10.
    Bukova-Güzel, E., Kula, S., Uğurel, I., Ӧzgür, Z.: Sufficiency of undergraduate education in developing mathematical pedagogical content knowledge: student teachers’ views. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 2222–2226 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnston, J., Ahtee, M.: Comparing primary student teachers’ attitudes, subject knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge needs in a physics activity. Teach. Teach. Educ. 22(4), 503–512 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borg, S.: Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. Biddles Ltd., King’s Lynn (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freeman, D., Richards, J.C.: Teacher learning in language teaching. Lang. Teach. Res. 1(1), 81–92 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, H., Badger, R.G.: In a strange and uncharted land: ESP teachers’ strategies for dealing with unpredicted problems in subject knowledge during class. Engl. Specif. Purp. 28(1), 19–32 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berry, B.: Getting “real” about teaching effectiveness and teacher retention. J. Curric. Instr. (JoCI) 4(1), 1–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Atai, M.R.: Iranian EAP programs in practice: a study of key methodological aspects. Sheikhbahaee Res. Bull. 1(2), 1–15 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Atai, M.R.: EAP teacher education: searching for an effective model integrating content & language teachers’ schemes. In: Proceedings of PAAL Conference, pp. 23–41. Kangwong National University, Chuncheon, Korea (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsui, A.B.M.: Expertise in teaching: perspectives and issues. In: Johnson, K. (ed.) Expertise in Second Language Learning and Teaching, pp. 167–189. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robinson, P.C.: ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hyland, K.: English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. Routledge, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim, H., Hannafin, M.J.: Situated case-based knowledge: an emerging framework for prospective teacher learning. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24(7), 1837–1845 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Borg, S.: Introducing language teacher cognition (2009). http://www.education.leeds.ac.uk/people/staff.php?staff=29
  23. 23.
    Atai, M.R., Fatahi-Majd, M.: Exploring the practices and cognitions of Iranian ELT instructors and subject teachers in teaching EAP reading comprehension. Engl. Specif. Purp. 33(1), 27–38 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flores, M.A., Day, C.: Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: a multi-perspective study. Teach. Teach. Educ. 22(2), 219–232 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumaravadivelu, B.: Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. Yale University Press, New Haven (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education DepartmentUC Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations