Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Representing Functional Relationships of Adaptive Instructional Systems in a Conceptual Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adaptive Instructional Systems (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12214))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper examines the relationships of various functional elements within a class of instructional technologies called adaptive instructional systems (AISs) which include intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs), intelligent mentors or recommender systems, and intelligent instructional media. AISs are artificially-intelligent, computer-based systems that guide learning experiences by tailoring instruction and recommendations based on the goals, needs, and preferences of each individual learner or team in the context of domain learning objectives. Under Project 2247.1, The Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) is developing standards and guidance for the modeling of AIS to characterize what is and is not an AIS. This paper was composed to document recommendations and generate discussion about the four models that have been proposed as core to the concept of AISs: learner models, adaptive models, domain models and interface models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sottilare, R., Brawner, K.: Component interaction within the generalized intelligent framework for tutoring (GIFT) as a model for adaptive instructional system standards. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) Conference, Montreal, Quebec (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Reiser, B.J.: Intelligent tutoring systems. Science 228(4698), 456–462 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Psotka, J., Sharon, A.M.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lessons Learned. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1988). ISBN 978-0-8058-0192-7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baylor, A.: Beyond butlers: intelligent agents as mentors. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 22(4), 373–382 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sottilare, R.A.: A comprehensive review of design goals and emerging solutions for adaptive instructional systems. Technol. Instr. Cognition Learn. 11(1), 5–38 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. VanLehn, K.: The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ. Psychol. 46(4), 197–221 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sottilare, R., et al.: Introduction to team tutoring and GIFT. Des. Recomm. Intell. Tutor. Syst. 6, 1–15 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sottilare, R.: Considerations in the development of an ontology for a generalized intelligent framework for tutoring. In: Proceedings of the 13M Conference on International Defense and Homeland Security Simulation Workshop, Vienna (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sottilare, R., Ragusa, C., Hoffman, M., Goldberg, B.: Characterizing an adaptive tutoring learning effect chain for individual and team tutoring. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training Simulation and Education Conference, Orlando (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sottilare, R.A., Burke, C.S., Salas, E., Sinatra, A.M., Johnston, J.H., Gilbert, S.B.: Designing adaptive instruction for teams: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0146-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., Suraweera, P.: Intelligent tutors for all: the constraint-based approach. IEEE Intell. Syst. 4, 38–45 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sottilare, R., Holden, H., Brawner, K., Goldberg, B.: Challenges and emerging concepts in the development of adaptive, computer-based tutoring systems for team training. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training Simulation and Education Conference, Orlando (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston, J., et al.: Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems For Teams: What Matters. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Salas, E.: Team Training Essentials: A Research-Based Guide. Routledge, London (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Gagné, R.M.: Essentials of Learning for Instruction. Dryden Press, Hinsdale (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krathwohl, D.R.: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Into Pract. 41(4), 212–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sottilare, R.A., Proctor, M.: Passively classifying student mood and performance within intelligent tutors. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(2), 101–114 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aleven, V., Mclaren, B., Roll, I., Koedinger, K.: Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: a model of help seeking with a cognitive tutor. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 16(2), 101–128 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rus, V., Graesser, A.C.: The question generation shared task and evaluation challenge. In: Proceedings of the University of Memphis. National Science Foundation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Graesser, A.C.: Conversations with autotutor help students learn. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 124–132 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson, W.L., Lester, J.C.: Face-to-face interaction with pedagogical agents, twenty years later. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 25–36 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nye, B.D., Graesser, A.C., Hu, X.: AutoTutor and family: a review of 17 years of natural language tutoring. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24(4), 427–469 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D’Mello, S.K., Graesser, A., King, B.: Toward spoken human-computer tutorial dialogues. Hum. Comput. Interact. 25(4), 289–323 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker, R.S., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M., Graesser, A.C.: Better to be frustrated than bored: the incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive–affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 68(4), 223–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D’Mello, S.K., Graesser, A.: Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features. User Model. User Adap. Interact. 20(2), 147–187 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge all of the contributions of each and every member of the IEEE AIS Working Group under Project 2247. We especially wish to acknowledge the contributions of the members of the AIS Conceptual Modeling Subgroup led by Anne Knowles: Avron Barr, Jeanine DeFalco, Jim Goodell, Vladimir Goodkovsky, Xiangen Hu, Dale Johnson, Bruce Peoples, Ram Rajendran, Khanh-Phuong (KP) Thai.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Soar Technology, Inc., Orlando, FL, 32817, USA

    Robert Sottilare

  2. Anne Knowles Consulting, San Diego, CA, USA

    Anne Knowles

  3. Quality Information Partners, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Jim Goodell

Authors
  1. Robert Sottilare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Knowles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jim Goodell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Sottilare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Soar Technology, Inc., Orlando, FL, USA

    Robert A. Sottilare

  2. Fraunhofer FKIE, Wachtberg, Germany

    Jessica Schwarz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sottilare, R., Knowles, A., Goodell, J. (2020). Representing Functional Relationships of Adaptive Instructional Systems in a Conceptual Model. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50787-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50788-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation