Skip to main content

I Don’t Have That Much Data! Reusing User Behavior Models for Websites from Different Domains

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web Engineering (ICWE 2020)

Abstract

User behavior models see increased usage in automated evaluation and design of user interfaces (UIs). Obtaining training data for the models is costly, since it generally requires the involvement of human subjects. For interaction’s subjective quality parameters, like aesthetic impressions, it is even inevitable. In our paper, we study applicability of trained user behavior models between different domains of websites. We collected subjective assessments of Aesthetics, Complexity and Orderliness from 137 human participants for more than 3000 homepages from 7 domains, and used them to train 21 artificial neural network (ANN) models. The input neurons were 32 quantitative metrics obtained via computer vision-based analysis of the homepages screenshots. Then, we tested how well each ANN model can predict subjective assessments for websites from other domains, and correlated the changes in prediction accuracies with the pairwise distances between the domains. We found that the Complexity scale was rather domain-independent, whereas “foreign-domain” models for Aesthetics and Orderliness had on average greater prediction errors for other domains, by 60% and 45%, respectively. The results of our study provide web designers and engineers with a first framework to assess the reusability and difference in prediction accuracy of the models, for more informed decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://va.wuikb.info.

  2. 2.

    https://interfacemetrics.aalto.fi/.

  3. 3.

    using http://curlie.org/.

  4. 4.

    Our full implementation is available at https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1PFFMkE9vSE7aWBlKdFSLEu0jnSQX7fHw.

References

  1. Nielsen, J.: Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 152–158 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nebeling, M. et al.: Crowdstudy: general toolkit for crowdsourced evaluation of web interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, pp. 255–264 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frick, T.: Designing for Sustainability: a Guide to Building Greener Digital Products and Services. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen, J.: Putting A/B Testing in Its Place. Nielsen Norman Group, 14 August 2005. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/putting-ab-testing-in-its-place/. Accessed 13 Jan 2020

  5. Beirekdar, A., Keita, M., Noirhomme, M., Randolet, F., Vanderdonckt, J., Mariage, C.: Flexible reporting for automated usability and accessibility evaluation of web sites. In: Costabile, M.F., Paternò, F. (eds.) INTERACT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3585, pp. 281–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11555261_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakaev, M.: Assessing similarity for case-based web user interface design. In: Alexandrov, D.A., Boukhanovsky, A.V., Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2018, Part I. CCIS, vol. 858, pp. 353–365. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Grigera, J., et al.: Automatic detection of usability smells in web applications. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 97, 129–148 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Speicher, M., Both, A., Gaedke, M.: Ensuring web interface quality through usability-based split testing. In: Casteleyn, S., Rossi, G., Winckler, M. (eds.) ICWE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8541, pp. 93–110. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08245-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen, J.: The Negativity Bias in User Experience. Nielsen Norman Group, 23 October 2016. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/negativity-bias-ux/. Accessed 14 Jan 2020

  10. Speicher, M. et al.: TellMyRelevance! predicting the relevance of web search results from cursor interactions. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1281–1290 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, X., et al.: The emergence of interactive behaviour: a model of rational menu search. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4217–4226 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, Y.-P., Jung, T.-P.: Improving EEG-based emotion classification using conditional transfer learning. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 334 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Torrey, L., Shavlik, J.: Transfer learning. In: Handbook of Research on Machine Learning Applications and Trends: Algorithms, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 242–264. IGI Global (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bakaev, M., et al.: Auto-extraction and integration of metrics for web user interfaces. J. Web Eng. 17(6), 561–590 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Estuka, F., Miller, J.: A pure visual approach for automatically extracting and aligning structured web data. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 19(4), 1–26 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oulasvirta, A. et al.: Aalto Interface Metrics (AIM): a service and codebase for computational GUI evaluation. In: 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Adjunct Proceedings, pp. 16–19. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, D. et al: Domain switch-aware holistic recurrent neural network for modeling multi-domain user behavior. In: 12th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 663–671 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dou, Q., et al.: Webthetics: quantifying webpage aesthetics with deep learning. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 124, 56–66 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boychuk, E., Bakaev, M.: Entropy and compression based analysis of web user interfaces. In: Bakaev, M., Frasincar, F., Ko, I.-Y. (eds.) ICWE 2019. LNCS, vol. 11496, pp. 253–261. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19274-7_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Hachenberg, C., Gottron, T.: Locality sensitive hashing for scalable structural classification and clustering of web documents. In: Proceedings of the ACM CIKM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The reported study was funded by RFBR and DST according to the research project No. 19-57-45006. We thank Vladimir Khvorostov from NSTU for his technical work on collecting the screenshots, the assessments, and the metrics. We are also grateful to all the colleagues who participated and organized assessments of websites.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxim Bakaev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bakaev, M., Speicher, M., Heil, S., Gaedke, M. (2020). I Don’t Have That Much Data! Reusing User Behavior Models for Websites from Different Domains. In: Bielikova, M., Mikkonen, T., Pautasso, C. (eds) Web Engineering. ICWE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12128. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50578-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50578-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50577-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50578-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics