Abstract
The eligibility for hormone therapy to treat breast cancer largely depends on the tumor’s estrogen receptor (ER) status. Recent studies show that the ER status correlates with morphological features found in Haematoxylin-Eosin (HE) slides. Thus, HE analysis might be sufficient for patients for whom the classifier confidently predicts the ER status and thereby obviate the need for additional examination, such as immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Several prior works are limited by either the use of engineered features, multi-stage models that use features unspecific to HE images or a lack of explainability. To address these limitations, this work proposes an end-to-end neural network ensemble that shows state-of-the-art performance. We demonstrate that the approach also translates to the prediction of the cancer grade. Moreover, subsets can be selected from the test data for which the model can detect a positive ER status with a precision of 94% while classifying 13% of the patients. To compensate for the reduced interpretability of the model that comes along with end-to-end training, this work applies Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) to determine the relevant parts of the images a posteriori, commonly visualized as a heatmap overlayed with the input image. We found that nuclear and stromal morphology and lymphocyte infiltration play an important role in the classification of the ER status. This demonstrates that interpretable machine learning can be a vital tool for validating and generating hypotheses about morphological biomarkers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Available at https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/projects/TCGA-BRCA/.
- 2.
Note that this formulation includes both fully-connected and convolutional layers.
- 3.
The output of a DNN typically does not represent the true confidence of the model in terms of probability since it is not properly calibrated. However, here, we stick with the term “confidence” to denote the output probability of the highest scoring class as it is commonly used that way in the literature.
References
Alber, M.: Software and application patterns for explanation methods. In: Samek, W., Montavon, G., Vedaldi, A., Hansen, L.K., Müller, K.-R. (eds.) Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11700, pp. 399–433. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6_22
Alber, M., et al.: Innvestigate neural networks!. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20(93), 1–8 (2019)
Arpino, G., Bardou, V.J., Clark, G.M., Elledge, R.M.: Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res. 6(3), R149 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr767
Bach, S., Binder, A., Montavon, G., Klauschen, F., Müller, K.R., Samek, W.: On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decisions by layer-wise relevance propagation. PLoS ONE 10(7), e0130140 (2015)
Beck, A.H., et al.: Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival. Sci. Transl. Med. 3(108), 108ra113–108ra113 (2011)
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Vincent, P.: Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35(8), 1798–1828 (2013)
Binder, A., et al.: Towards computational fluorescence microscopy: machine learning-based integrated prediction of morphological and molecular tumor profiles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.11178 (2018)
Budczies, J., et al.: Classical pathology and mutational load of breast cancer-integration of two worlds. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 1(4), 225–238 (2015)
Cortes, C., Mohri, M.: AUC optimization vs. error rate minimization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 313–320 (2004)
Couture, H.D., et al.: Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype. NPJ Breast Cancer 4, 30 (2018)
Dombrowski, A.K., Alber, M., Anders, C., Ackermann, M., Müller, K.R., Kessel, P.: Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blame. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 13567–13578 (2019)
Elston, C.W., Ellis, I.O.: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. i. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19(5), 403–410 (1991)
Hägele, M., et al.: Resolving challenges in deep learning-based analyses of histopathological images using explanation methods. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–12 (2020)
Hammond, M.E.H., et al.: American society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version). Archiv. Pathol. Lab. Med. 134(7), e48–e72 (2010)
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)
Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K., Müller, H.: Causability and explainabilty of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 9(4), e1312 (2019)
Hooker, S., Erhan, D., Kindermans, P.J., Kim, B.: Evaluating feature importance estimates. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.10758 (2018)
Hui, L.Y.W., Binder, A.: BatchNorm decomposition for deep neural network interpretation. In: Rojas, I., Joya, G., Catala, A. (eds.) IWANN 2019. LNCS, vol. 11507, pp. 280–291. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20518-8_24
Ioffe, S., Szegedy, C.: Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167 (2015)
Jurmeister, P., et al.: Machine learning analysis of DNA methylation profiles distinguishes primary lung squamous cell carcinomas from head and neck metastases. Sci. Transl. Med. 11(509), eaaw8513 (2019). 11 September 2019, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw8513
Kindermans, P.J., et al.: Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.05598 (2017)
Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)
Klauschen, F., et al.: Scoring of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes: From visual estimation to machine learning. Semin. Cancer Biol. 52, 151–157 (2018)
Korbar, B., et al.: Looking under the hood: deep neural network visualization to interpret whole-slide image analysis outcomes for colorectal polyps. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPR), pp. 821–827 (2017)
Lapuschkin, S., Wäldchen, S., Binder, A., Montavon, G., Samek, W., Müller, K.R.: Unmasking clever hans predictors and assessing what machines really learn. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1096 (2019)
Millis, R.R.: Correlation of hormone receptors with pathological features in human breast cancer. Cancer 46(S12), 2869–2871 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19801215)46:12+<2869::AID-CNCR2820461426>3.0.CO;2-Q
Montavon, G., Binder, A., Lapuschkin, S., Samek, W., Müller, K.-R.: Layer-wise relevance propagation: an overview. In: Samek, W., Montavon, G., Vedaldi, A., Hansen, L.K., Müller, K.-R. (eds.) Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11700, pp. 193–209. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6_10
Montavon, G., Samek, W., Müller, K.R.: Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks. Digit. Signal Proc. 73, 1–15 (2018)
Osborne, C.K., Yochmowitz, M.G., Knight III, W.A., McGuire, W.L.: The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast cancer. Cancer 46(S12), 2884–2888 (1980)
Platt, J.: Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. Adv. Large Margin Classif. 10(3), 61–74 (1999)
Rawat, R.R., Ruderman, D., Macklin, P., Rimm, D.L., Agus, D.B.: Correlating nuclear morphometric patterns with estrogen receptor status in breast cancer pathologic specimens. NPJ Breast Cancer 4, 32 (2018)
Samek, W., Montavon, G., Vedaldi, A., Hansen, L.K., Müller, K.-R. (eds.): Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11700. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6
Samek, W., Binder, A., Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., Müller, K.R.: Evaluating the visualization of what a deep neural network has learned. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 28(11), 2660–2673 (2016)
Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., Batra, D.: Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 618–626 (2017)
Shamai, G., Binenbaum, Y., Slossberg, R., Duek, I., Gil, Z., Kimmel, R.: Artificial intelligence algorithms to assess hormonal status from tissue microarrays in patients with breast cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 2(7), e197700–e197700 (2019)
Smilkov, D., Thorat, N., Kim, B., Viégas, F., Wattenberg, M.: SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03825 (2017)
Vahadane, A., et al.: Structure-preserving color normalization and sparse stain separation for histological images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35(8), 1962–1971 (2016)
Varma, S., Simon, R.: Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinformatics 7(1), 91 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seegerer, P. et al. (2020). Interpretable Deep Neural Network to Predict Estrogen Receptor Status from Haematoxylin-Eosin Images. In: Holzinger, A., Goebel, R., Mengel, M., Müller, H. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Digital Pathology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12090. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50402-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50402-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50401-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50402-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)