Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science

RCIS 2020: Research Challenges in Information Science pp 157–173Cite as

Online Peer Support Groups for Behavior Change: Moderation Requirements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

  • 1974 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 385))

Abstract

Technology-assisted behaviour awareness and change is on the rise. Examples include apps and sites for fitness, healthy eating, mental health and smoking cessation. These information systems recreated principles of influence and persuasion in a digital form allowing real-time observation, interactivity and intervention. Peer support groups are one of the behavioural influence techniques which showed various benefits, including hope installation and relapse prevention. However, unmoderated groups may become a vehicle for comparisons and unmanaged interactions leading to digression, normalising the negative behaviour and lowering self-esteem. A typical requirement of such groups is to be of a social and supportive nature whereas moderation, through humans or artificial agents, may face a risk of being seen as centralised and overly managed governance approach. In this paper, we explore the requirements and different preferences about moderators as seen by members. We follow a mixed-method approach consisting of a qualitative phase that included two focus groups and 16 interviews, followed by a quantitative phase, including a survey with 215 participants who declared having well-being issues. We report on the qualitative phase findings achieved through thematic analysis. We also report and discuss the survey results studying the role of gender, self-control, personality traits, culture, the perception of usefulness and willingness to join the group as predictors of the members’ expectations from moderators, resulted from the qualitative phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Taherdoost, H.: A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Proc. Manuf. 22, 960–967 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olson, J.M., Ross, M.: False feedback about placebo effectiveness - consequences for the misattribution of speech anxiety. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24(4), 275–291 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunt, T.J.: Leader-member exchange relationships in health information management. Perspect Health Inf. Manag. 11(Spring) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Imhoff, R., Erb, H.P.: What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35(3), 309–320 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schafer, M., Crichlow, S.: Antecedents of groupthink: a quantitative study. J. Conflict Resolut. 40(3), 415–435 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zajonc, R.B.: Social facilitation. Science 149, 269–274 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Platania, J., Moran, G.P.: Social facilitation as a function of the mere presence of others. J. Soc. Psychol. 141(2), 190–197 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crisp, R.J., Turner, R.N.: Essential Social Psychology, vol. 4th. SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2017). pages cm

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dai, S.L., Li, Y.C., Zhang, W.: Personality traits of entrepreneurial top management team members and new venture performance. Soc. Behav. Pers. 47(7), 15 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stamkou, E., van Kleef, G.A., Homan, A.C.: Feeling entitled to rules: entitled individuals prevent norm violators from rising up the ranks. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 84(1), 10 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hofstede Insights. Compare countries (2019). https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/. Accessed 28 April 2019

  12. Scholl, A., Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., Scheepers, D., De Wit, F.: Highly identified power-holders feel responsible: the interplay between social identification and social power within groups. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 57(1), 112–129 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Delrue, J., Soenens, B., Morbée, S., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L.: Do athletes’ responses to coach autonomy support and control depend on the situation and athletes’ personal motivation? Psychol. Sport Exerc. 43, 321–332 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matud, M.a.P., Ibañez, I., Bethencourt, J.M., Marrero, R., Carballeira, M.: Structural gender differences in perceived social support. Pers. Individ. Differ. 35(8), 1919–1929 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Strom, J., Høybye, M.T., Laursen, M., Jørgensen, L.B., Nielsen, C.V.: Lumbar spine fusion patients’ use of an internet support group: mixed methods study. J. Med. Internet Res. 21(7), 17 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Zomeren, M., Louis, W.R.: Culture meets collective action: exciting synergies and some lessons to learn for the future. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 20(3), 277–284 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., Norenzayan, A.: The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33(2–3), 61–83 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Suler, J.: The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 7(3), 321–326 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ciocarlan, A., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Kindness is contagious: study into exploring engagement and adapting persuasive games for wellbeing. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 311–319. ACM, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rajani, N.B., Weth, D., Mastellos, N., Filippidis, F.T.: Use of gamification strategies and tactics in mobile applications for smoking cessation: a review of the UK mobile app market. BMJ Open 9(6), e027883 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McKay, F.H., Wright, A., Shill, J., Stephens, H., Uccellini, M.: Using health and well-being apps for behavior change: a systematic search and rating of apps. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7(7), e11926 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alrobai, A., Algashami, A., Dogan, H., Corner, T., Phalp, K., Ali, R.: COPE.er method: combating digital addiction via online peer support groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 16(7), 1162 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Terry, G.: Thematic analysis. Qual. Res. Clin. Health Psychol. 24, 95–114 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Matthews, J., Win, K.T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Freeman, M.: Persuasive technology in mobile applications promoting physical activity: a systematic review. J. Med. Syst. 40(3), 72 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L.: culturally relevant design guidelines for encouraging healthy eating behavior. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 72(2), 207–223 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L., Vassileva, J.: Gender, age, and responsiveness to Cialdini’s persuasion strategies. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 147–159. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Alkış, N., Temizel, T.T.: The impact of individual differences on influence strategies. Pers. Individ. Differ. 87, 147–152 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ciocarlan, A., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Kindness is contagious: exploring engagement in a gamified persuasive intervention for wellbeing. In: PGW@ CHI PLAY (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lowensteyn, I., Berberian, V., Berger, C., Da Costa, D., Joseph, L., Grover, S.A.: The Sustainability of a workplace wellness program that incorporates gamification principles: participant engagement and health benefits after 2 years. Am. J. Health Promot. 33(6), 850–858 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cialdini, R.: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rammstedt, B., John, O.P.: Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. J. Res. Pers. 1(41), 203–212 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R.F., Boone, A.L.: High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J. Pers. 2(72), 271–324 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maro, S., Sundklev, E., Persson, C.-O., Liebel, G., Steghöfer, J.-P.: Impact of gamification on trace link vetting: a controlled experiment. In: Knauss, E., Goedicke, M. (eds.) REFSQ 2019. LNCS, vol. 11412, pp. 90–105. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15538-4_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Barn, Balbir S., Barn, R.: Human and value sensitive aspects of mobile app design: a foucauldian perspective. In: Krogstie, J., Reijers, Hajo A. (eds.) CAiSE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10816, pp. 103–118. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91563-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Haake, P., et al.: Configurations of user involvement and participation in relation to information system project success. In: Krogstie, J., Reijers, Hajo A. (eds.) CAiSE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10816, pp. 87–102. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91563-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Aldhayan, M., Cham, S., Kostoulas, T., Almourad, M.B., Ali, R.: Online peer support groups to combat digital addiction: user acceptance and rejection factors. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S. (eds.) WorldCIST’19 2019. AISC, vol. 932, pp. 139–150. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16187-3_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bournemouth University, Poole, UK

    Manal Aldhayan, Mohammad Naiseh & John McAlaney

  2. College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar

    Raian Ali

Authors
  1. Manal Aldhayan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Naiseh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John McAlaney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Raian Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manal Aldhayan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Fabiano Dalpiaz

  2. Stockholm University, Kista, Sweden

    Jelena Zdravkovic

  3. The Institute of Digital Innovation and Research, Dublin, Ireland

    Pericles Loucopoulos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aldhayan, M., Naiseh, M., McAlaney, J., Ali, R. (2020). Online Peer Support Groups for Behavior Change: Moderation Requirements. In: Dalpiaz, F., Zdravkovic, J., Loucopoulos, P. (eds) Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 385. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50316-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50316-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50315-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50316-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation