Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1156))

Abstract

In this paper the issue of labeling noise is considered. Data labeling is the integral stage of the most part of the machine learning projects, so the problem spotlighted in the paper is quite topical.

According to the labeling noise source classification, a new approach is proposed, affecting both of the labeling noise sources. The first component of the approach is based on the distributed ledger technologies principles, including the automatic consensus between the experts. The second component includes the devices dependability improvement by means of fog- and edge-computing usage. Also some models are developed to estimate the approach and selected results of the simulation are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Auto-Keras. https://autokeras.com/. Accessed 19 May 2019

  2. Welcome to AirSim. https://github.com/microsoft/AirSim. Accessed 19 May 2019

  3. Detectron. https://research.fb.com/downloads/detectron/. Accessed 19 May 2019

  4. Machine Learning Project Structure: Stages, Roles, and Tools. https://www.altexsoft.com/blog/datascience/machine-learning-project-structure-stages-roles-and-tools/. Accessed 19 May 2019

  5. Hickey, R.J.: Noise modeling and evaluating learning from examples. Artif. Intell. 82(1–2), 157–179 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frénay, B., Verleysen, M.: Classification in the presence of label noise: a survey. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25(5), 845–869 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manwani, N., Sastry, P.S.: Noise tolerance under risk minimization. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 43(3), 1146–1151 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald, A., Hand, D.J., Eckley, I.A.: An empirical comparison of three boosting algorithms on real data sets with artificial class noise. In: Proceedings 4th International Workshop Multiple Classifier Systems, Guilford, UK, pp. 35–44, June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abellán, J., Masegosa, A.R.: Bagging decision trees on datasets with classification noise. In: Link, S., Prade, H. (eds.) Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. FoIKS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5956, pp. 248–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph, L., Gyorkos, T.W., Coupal, L.: Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. Am. J. Epidemiol. 141(3), 263–272 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perez, C.J., Giron, F.J., Martin, J., Ruiz, M., Rojano, C.: Misclassified multinomial data: a bayesian approach. Rev. R. Acad. Cien. Serie A. Mat. 101(1), 71–80 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Brodley, C.E., Friedl, M.A.: Identifying mislabeled training data. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 11, 131–167 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gamberger, D., Boskovic, R., Lavrac, N., Groselj, C.: Experiments with noise filtering in a medical domain. In: Proceedings 16th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bled, Slovenia, June 1999, pp. 143–151. Springer, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krauth, W., Mezard, M.: Learning algorithms with optimal stability in neural networks. J. Phys. A: Gen. Phys. 20(11), L745 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark, P., Niblett, T.: The CN2 induction algorithm. Mach. Learn. 3(4), 261–283 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cantador, I., Dorronsoro, J.R.: Boosting parallel perceptrons for label noise reduction in classification problems. In: Proceedings of First International Work-Conference on the Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation, IWINAC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain, 15–18 June 2005, vol. 3562, pp. 586–593 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kalyaev, I., Melnik, E., Klimenko, A.: A technique of adaptation of the workload distribution problem model for the fog-computing environment. In: Silhavy, R. (ed.) Cybernetics and Automation Control Theory Methods in Intelligent Algorithms. CSOC 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 986. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Melnik, E.V., Klimenko, A.B., Ivanov, D.Y.: The Distributed ledger-based technique of the neuronet training set forming. In: Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P., Prokopova, Z. (eds.) Computational Statistics and Mathematical Modeling Methods in Intelligent Systems. CoMeSySo 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1047. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Distributed ledger technology: beyond blockchain. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/distributed-ledger-technology-beyond-block-chain. Accessed 20 May 2019

  20. Wüst, K., Ritzdorf, H., Karame, G.O., Glykantzis, V., Capkun, S., Gervais, A.: On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 3–16. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. An introduction to the Block-Lattice. https://medium.com/coinmonks/an-introduction-to-the-block-lattice-382071fc34ac. Accessed 20 May 2019

  22. Nguyen, G., Kim, K.: A survey about consensus algorithms used in blockchain. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 14(1), 101–128 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bonomi, F, Milito, R, Zhu, J., Addepalli, S.: Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In: Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, pp. 13–16. ACM, Mew York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moysiadis, V., Sarigiannidis, P., Moscholios, I.: Towards distributed data management in fog computing. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2018 (2018). article ID 7597686, 14 p

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chiang, M., Zhang, T.: Fog and IoT: an overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J. 3(6), 854–864 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Melnik, E.V., Klimenko, A.B., Ivanov, D.Y.: Fog-computing concept usage as means to enhance information and control system reliability. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 1015(3), 032175 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Melnik, E.V., Klimenko, A.B., Ivanov, D.Y.: Distributed information and control system reliability enhancement by fog-computing concept application. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 327, no. 2 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Melnik, E., Klimenko, A., Ivanov, D.: The model of device community forming problem for the geographically-distributed information and control systems using fog-computing concept. In: IV International research conference Information technologies in Science, Management, Social sphere and Medicine (ITSMSSM 2017), Advances in Computer Science Research, vol. 72, pp. 132–136. Atlantis Press, Amsterdam (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson, R., Martinez, T.R.: Instance pruning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, TN, July 1997, pp. 403–411 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hart, P.: The condensed nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 14, 515–516 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. pBFT—Understanding the Consensus Algorithm. https://medium.com/coinmonks/pbft-understanding-the-algorithm-b7a7869650ae. Accessed 19 May 2019

  32. Paxos Made Simple. https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/paxos-simple.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2019

  33. Strogonov, S.A.: Individual reliability forecasting of IC chip with the help of ARIMA models. Mag. Compon. Technol. 10, 44–49 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper has been prepared within the RFBR project 18-29-22086 and RAS presidium fundamental research №7 «New designs in the prospective directions of the energetics, mechanics and robotics», № gr.project AAAA-A18-118020190041-1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. Klimenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Melnik, E.V., Klimenko, A.B. (2020). A Complex Approach to the Data Labeling Efficiency Improvement. In: Kovalev, S., Tarassov, V., Snasel, V., Sukhanov, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’19). IITI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1156. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50097-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics