Skip to main content

Exploring Navigation Styles in a FutureLearn MOOC

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12149))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents for the first time a detailed analysis of fine-grained navigation style identification in MOOCs backed by a large number of active learners. The result shows 1) whilst the sequential style is clearly in evidence, the global style is less prominent; 2) the majority of the learners do not belong to either category; 3) navigation styles are not as stable as believed in the literature; and 4) learners can, and do, swap between navigation styles with detrimental effects. The approach is promising, as it provides insight into online learners’ temporal engagement, as well as a tool to identify vulnerable learners, which potentially benefit personalised interventions (from teachers or automatic help) in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2011 | Connecting the Technical, Pedagogical, and Social Dimensions of Learning Analytics. https://tekri.athabascau.ca/analytics/. Accessed 01 Mar 2020

  2. Shi, L., Cristea, A.I.: In-depth exploration of engagement patterns in MOOCs. In: Hacid, H., Cellary, W., Wang, H., Paik, H.-Y., Zhou, R. (eds.) WISE 2018. LNCS, vol. 11234, pp. 395–409. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02925-8_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Papamitsiou, Z., Economides, A.A.: Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: a systematic literature review of empirical evidence. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17, 49–64 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferguson, R., Clow, D.: Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge, LAK 2015, pp. 51–58. ACM Press, Poughkeepsie, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723606

  5. Alexander, C.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. OUP, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Educational data mining: a survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Syst. Appl. 33, 135–146 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alamri, A., et al.: Predicting MOOCs dropout using only two easily obtainable features from the first week’s activities. In: Coy, A., Hayashi, Y., Chang, M. (eds.) ITS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11528, pp. 163–173. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22244-4_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Mirriahi, N.: Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50, 128–138 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, X., Meng, Y., Ordóñez de Pablos, P., Sun, Y.: Learning analytics in collaborative learning supported by Slack: from the perspective of engagement. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92, 625–633 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.012

  10. Shoufan, A.: Estimating the cognitive value of YouTube’s educational videos: a learning analytics approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92, 450–458 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cristea, A.I., Alamri, A., Kayama, M., Stewart, C., Alshehri, M., Shi, L.: Earliest predictor of dropout in MOOCs: a longitudinal study of futurelearn courses. Presented at the 27th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD2018), Lund, Sweden, 22 August (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shi, L., Cristea, A., Toda, A., Oliveira, W.: Revealing the hidden patterns: a comparative study on profiling subpopulations of MOOC students. In: The 28th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD2019). Association for Information Systems, Toulon, France (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu, M., Bergner, Y., Zhang, Y., Baker, R., Wang, Y., Paquette, L.: Longitudinal engagement, performance, and social connectivity: a MOOC case study using exponential random graph models. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, LAK 2016, pp. 223–230. ACM Press, Edinburgh (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883934

  14. Yang, B., Shi, L., Toda, A.: Demographical changes of student subgroups in MOOCs: towards predicting at-risk students. Presented at the 28th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD2019), Toulon, France, August (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Laer, S., Elen, J.: The effect of cues for calibration on learners’ self-regulated learning through changes in learners’ learning behaviour and outcomes. Comput. Educ. 135, 30–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Felder, R.M., Silverman, L.K.: Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng. Educ. 78, 674–681 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 4, 193–212 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirschner, P.A.: Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Comput. Educ. 106, 166–171 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hassan, M.A., Habiba, U., Majeed, F., Shoaib, M.: Adaptive gamification in e-learning based on students’ learning styles. Interact. Learn. Environ. 1–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1588745

  20. O’Grady, N.: Are Learners Learning? (and How do We Know?). https://about.futurelearn.com/research-insights/learners-learning-know. Accessed 23 Feb 2019

  21. Clow, D.: MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK 2013, p. 185. ACM Press, Leuven (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460332

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Shi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shi, L., Cristea, A.I., Toda, A.M., Oliveira, W. (2020). Exploring Navigation Styles in a FutureLearn MOOC. In: Kumar, V., Troussas, C. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49662-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49663-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics