Advertisement

Evaluation of Robotic Navigation Model Considering Group Norms of Personal Space in Human–Robot Communities

  • Yotaro FuseEmail author
  • Hiroshi Takenouchi
  • Masataka Tokumaru
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 899)

Abstract

We propose a robotic model that helps determine a robot’s position when there are changes in the human’s personal space in a human–robot community. Recently, there have been a number of efforts to develop personal robots suitable for human communities. Determining a robot’s position is important not only to avoid collisions with humans but also to maintain a socially acceptable distance with humans. The inter–personal space maintained by persons in a community depends on the closeness of the persons. Therefore, robots need to determine the positions of persons and evaluate the changes made in their personal space. In this paper, we propose a robotic model and examine whether the experimental participants could distinguish the robot’s trajectory from the human’s trajectory in the simulation. Our results showed that none of the participants could completely distinguish between the robot’s and human’s trajectories.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Hegel, F., et al.: Understanding social robots. In: 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pp.169–174 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kruse, T., et al.: Human-aware robot navigation: a survey. Robot. Auton. Syst. 61(12), 1726–1743 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chatterjee, I., Steinfeld, A.: Performance of a low–cost, human–inspired perception approach for dense moving crowd navigation. In: 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 578–585 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chi, W., et al.: A human–friendly robot navigation algorithm using the risk–RRT approach. In: IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR), pp. 227–232 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Truong, X.T., et al.: Approaching humans in crowded and dynamic environments. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), pp. 476–481 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindner, F.: A conceptual model of personal space for human–aware robot activity placement. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5770–5775 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feldman, D.C.: The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9(1), 47–53 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuse, Y., et al.: A robot model that obeys a norm of a human group by participating in the group and interacting with its members. In: IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, vol. E102-D, no. 1, pp. 185–194, January 2019Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sundstrom, E., et al.: Interpersonal relationships and personal space: research review and theoretical model. Hum. Ecol. 4(1), 47–67 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cristani, M., et al.: Towards computational proxemics: Inferring social relations from interpersonal distances. In: IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 290–297 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hayduk, L.A.: Personal space: understanding the simplex model. J. Nonverbal Behav. 18(3), 245–260 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yotaro Fuse
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hiroshi Takenouchi
    • 2
  • Masataka Tokumaru
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Kansai UniversitySuita-shi, OsakaJapan
  2. 2.Fukuoka Institute of TechnologyHigashi-ku, FukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Kansai UniversitySuita-shi, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations