Skip to main content

What Do We Transfer?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management in High Risk Industries

Abstract

This chapter examines through a review how the literature makes the link between knowledge, know-how, skills and competencies. It suggests that competencies must be mobilized in order to perform an activity and that this mobilization is multi-factorial and occurs when in action. It suggests a way to synthetize the conclusions of the review through the Knowledge–Know-How–Skills model (KKHS model) depicting the interrelationship between the three notions, demonstrates the robustness of the model and exposes how it integrates the Knowledge Management paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In French, original questions were:

    S1: Selon vous, vous êtes compétent pour cette activité.

    Q1: Selon vous, qu’est-ce qui est d’abord requis pour un novice en termes de compétences pour réaliser cette activité?

    Q2: Selon vous, réalisant cette activité, qu’est-ce qui améliore votre compétence entre la répétition et la fréquence?

References

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Northwestern University. (2004). Guidelines for writing a competency based job description (Report). http://www.northwestern.edu/hr/compensation/GuidelinesCompetencybasedJD.pdf.

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. London: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organisational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boam, R., & Sparrow, P. (1992). Designing and achieving competency. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, X., Bonjour, E., & Grabot, B. (2007). Formalisation and use of competencies for industrial performance optimisation: A survey. Computers in Industry, 58, 98–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 3, 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M. (1993). Organisational learning: A review of some literature. Organisational Studies, 14, 375–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph. (2011). Human or avatar: Psychological dimensions on full scope, hybrid, and virtual reality simulators. In Proceedings of the Serious Games & Simulation Workshop (pp. 22–36). Paris, France. http://hayka-kultura.org/larsen.html.

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph. (2012a). Simulation training to prepare for robotic intervention in a hostile environment. Socio-Organizational Factors for Safe Nuclear Operation, 1, 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph. (2012b). Use of simulator training for the study of operational communication—The case of pilots of French nuclear reactors: Reinforcement of reliability. Socio-Organizational Factors for Safe Nuclear Operation, 1, 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph. (2012c). Safety and reliability for nuclear production. Socio-Organizational Factors for Safe Nuclear Operation, 1, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph. (2013, August 15–16). Virtual training, human-computer & software interactions, and social-based embodiness. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Electronics and Communication Engineering (pp. 364–370). Venice, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph. (2014). Analyse organisationnelle & de besoins – Proposition de solutions: Volet Stratégique / Orientation Stratégique 1/4 [Organizational & needs analysis - Proposed solutions: Strategic segment / Strategic direction 1/4]. Analysis ref: DZ/./StratProf-analyse Besoins ind02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph., Berton, J., Rouillac, L., Geeraerts, Th., & Granry, J. C. (2015). Systematic overestimation of perceived occupational stress. In Proceeding of the 22nd International “Stress & Behavior” Conference—ISBC 2015 (p. 26). St Petersburg, Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph, & Boucherand, A. (2012). The structuring effects of tools in risky industrial work activity: Failures and solutions. Socio-Organizational Factors for Safe Nuclear Operation, 1, 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph., Geeraerst, Th., & Rouillac, L. (2011). Cognitive disorder and professional development by training: Comparison of simulator sessions for anesthetists and for nuclear reactor pilots. In Proceedings of the XVe European Conference on Developmental Psychology (pp. 83–88). Pianoro (Italia): Medimond Srl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph., & Labrucherie, M. (2008). Debriefing as an analysis of simulated situations: comparison between nuclear reactors operators and civil aircraft pilot. In Proceedings of the Symposium Activity 2008—Activity Analyses for Developing Work (p. 33). Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Ph, & Labrucherie, M. (2012). Simulation training debriefing as a work activity analysis tool: The case of nuclear reactors pilots and civil aircraft pilots. Socio-Organizational Factors for Safe Nuclear Operation, 1, 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, J., & Girard, J. (2015). Defining knowledge management: Toward an applied compendium. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijke, H., Meng, C., & Ris, C. (2003). Fitting to the job: The role of generic and vocational competencies in adjustment and performance. Labour Economics, 10(2), 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, C., Arthur, M. B., & Jones, A. M. (1995). Strategy through people: Adaptation and learning in the small-medium enterprise. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilyenkov, E. V. (2007 [2002]). A Contribution on the question of the concept of “activity” and its significance for pedagogy. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 45(4), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 13(2), 4–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N., & Luria, A. R. (2005 [1937]). The problem of the development of the intellect and learning in human psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 43(4), 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplat, J. (2001). Compétence et ergonomie. In J. Leplat et M. Montmollin (Eds.), Les compétences en ergonomie (pp. 41–53) Paris: Octares.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montmollin (de), M. (1986). L’intelligence de la tâche: éléments d’ergonomie cognitive. Berne: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. (1995). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 35–52). Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 85(7–8), 162–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros, L. (2004). Acting under uncertainty: The core-task analysis in ecological study of work. Espoo, Finland: VTT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrin, T. (2014). Competency-based hiring: The key to recruiting and retaining successful employees. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 114(9), 1330–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M., & Sen, A. (2009). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., & Dutta, A. (1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, roles, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC, 13(3), 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogalski, J., & Leplat, J. (2011). L’expérience professionnelle: expériences sédimentées et expériences épisodiques. Activités, 8(2), 4–31. http://www.activites.org/v8n2/rogalski.pdf.

  • Samurçay, R. (2005). Concevoir des situations simulées pour la formation pour la formation professionnelle. In P. Pastré (Ed.), Apprendre par la simulation – De l’analyse du travail aux apprentissages professionnels (pp. 221–240). Octarès: Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolova, E. (2012). Does activity theory have a future? Social Sciences, 1, 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talyzina, N. (1984). The contemporary condition of the activity theory of learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Tacit knowledge and intelligence in the everyday world. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 51–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterton, J., Delamare-Le Deist, Fr., & Stringfellow, E. (2006). Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: Clarification of the concept and prototype (Report of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, Cedefop Reference Series: 64). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruffe, C. (1993). Assessment centres: Identifying and developing competence. London: Institute of Personnel Management.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Fauquet-Alekhine .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fauquet-Alekhine, P. (2020). What Do We Transfer?. In: Knowledge Management in High Risk Industries. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49213-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics