Abstract
In this paper we propose the notion of “subjective reference” as a conceptual tool that explains how and why human-robot sexual interactions could reframe users approach to human-human sexual interactions. First, we introduce the current debate about Sexual Robotics, situated in the wider discussion about Social Robots, stating the urgency of a regulative framework. We underline the importance of a social-relational approach, mostly concerned about Social Robots impact in human social structures. Then, we point out the absence of a precise framework conceptualizing why Social Robots, and Sexual Robots in particular, may modify users’ sociality and relationality. Within a psychological framework, we propose to consider Sexual Robots as “subjective references”, namely objects symbolically referring to human subjects: we claim that, for the user experience, every action performed upon a Sexual Robot is symbolically directed toward a human subject, including degrading and violent practices. This shifting mechanism may transfer the user relational setting from human-robot interactions to human-human interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Some deny Roxxxy existence and claim that is a hoax. For the sake of this discussion, we believe that is not a crucial aspect the actual commercialization of such an artefact, but the fact that is an affordable technology for today’s state of art.
References
Baron-Cohen, S.: Zero Degrees of Empathy: A New Theory of Human Cruelty. Penguin, London (2011)
Bendel, O.: Sex robots from the perspective of machine ethics. In: Cheok, A.D., Devlin, K., Levy, D. (eds.) LSR 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10237, pp. 17–26. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57738-8_2
Breazeal, C.L.: Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Broadbent, E.: Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68, 627–652 (2017)
Coeckelbergh, M.: Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration. Ethics Inf. Technol. 12(3), 209–221 (2010)
Cox-George, C., Bewley, S.: I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry. BMJ Sex Reprod. Health 44, 161–164 (2018)
Danaher, J.: Robotic rape and robotic child sexual abuse: should they be criminalized? Crim. Law Philos. 11(1), 71–95 (2017)
Devlin, K.: In defence of sex machines: why trying to ban sex robots is wrong. In: The Conversation (2015)
Gunkel, D.J.: The rights of machines: caring for robotic care-givers. In: van Rysewyk, S.P., Pontier, M. (eds.) Machine Medical Ethics. ISCASE, vol. 74, pp. 151–166. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_10
Gunkel, D.J.: Robot Rights. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018a)
Gunkel, D.J.: The other question: can and should robots have rights? Ethics Inf. Technol. 20(2), 87–99 (2018b)
Levy, D., Loebner, H.: Robot prostitutes as alternatives to human sex workers. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, vol. 14 (2007)
Levy, D.: Love+Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships. Duckworth Overlook, London (2009a)
Levy, D.: The ethical treatment of artificially conscious robots. Int. J. Social Robot. 1(3), 209–216 (2009b)
Levy, D.: The ethics of robot prostitutes. In: Robots Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, pp. 223–231 (2012)
Krämer, N.C., Eimler, S., von der Pütten, A., Payr, S.: Theory of companions: what can theoretical models contribute to applications and understanding of human-robot interaction? Appl. Artif. Intell. 25(6), 474–502 (2011)
Maras, M.H., Shapiro, L.R.: Child sex dolls and robots: more than just an uncanny valley. J. Internet Law 21, 3–17 (2017)
Nicolò, A.M.: Appunti a proposito di una teoria dei rapporti soggettuali. Interazioni 2(20), 55–61 (2003)
Ogden, T.H.: The Primitive Edge of Experience. Karnak, London (1989)
Richardson, K.: Sex robot matters: slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 35(2), 46–53 (2016a)
Richardson, K.: Technological animism: the uncanny personhood of humanoid machines. Soc. Anal. 60(1), 110–128 (2016b)
Richardson, K.: The asymmetrical ‘relationship’: parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. ACM SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 45(3), 290–293 (2016c)
Strikwerda, L.: Present and future instances of virtual rape in light of three categories of legal philosophical theories on rape. Philos. Technol. 28(4), 491–510 (2015)
Sharkey, N., Sharkey, A.: The crying shame of robot nannies: an ethical appraisal. Interact. Stud. 11(2), 161–190 (2010)
Sharkey, N.: The ethical frontiers of robotics. Science 322(5909), 1800–1801 (2008)
Scheutz, M.: 13 The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and social robots. In: Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, p. 205 (2011)
Sparrow, R.: Robots in aged care: a dystopian future? AI Soc. 31(4), 445–454 (2016)
Sparrow, R.: Robots, rape, and representation. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9(4), 465–477 (2017)
Su, N.M., Lazar, A., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S.: Of dolls and men: anticipating sexual intimacy with robots. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 26(3), 13 (2019)
Sullins, J.P.: Robots, love, and sex: the ethics of building a love machine. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 3(4), 398–409 (2012)
Tavani, H.: Can social robots qualify for moral consideration? Reframing the question about robot rights. Information 9(4), 73 (2018)
Turkle, S., Taggart, W., Kidd, C.D., Dasté, O.: Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship. Connection Sci. 18(4), 347–361 (2006)
Winnicott, D.W.: Creativity and its origins. In: Essential Papers on the Psychology of Women, pp. 132–145 (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bisconti Lucidi, P., Piermattei, S. (2020). Sexual Robots: The Social-Relational Approach and the Concept of Subjective Reference. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Multimodal and Natural Interaction. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12182. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49062-1_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49062-1_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49061-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49062-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)