Skip to main content

Sexual Robots: The Social-Relational Approach and the Concept of Subjective Reference

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction. Multimodal and Natural Interaction (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12182))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we propose the notion of “subjective reference” as a conceptual tool that explains how and why human-robot sexual interactions could reframe users approach to human-human sexual interactions. First, we introduce the current debate about Sexual Robotics, situated in the wider discussion about Social Robots, stating the urgency of a regulative framework. We underline the importance of a social-relational approach, mostly concerned about Social Robots impact in human social structures. Then, we point out the absence of a precise framework conceptualizing why Social Robots, and Sexual Robots in particular, may modify users’ sociality and relationality. Within a psychological framework, we propose to consider Sexual Robots as “subjective references”, namely objects symbolically referring to human subjects: we claim that, for the user experience, every action performed upon a Sexual Robot is symbolically directed toward a human subject, including degrading and violent practices. This shifting mechanism may transfer the user relational setting from human-robot interactions to human-human interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some deny Roxxxy existence and claim that is a hoax. For the sake of this discussion, we believe that is not a crucial aspect the actual commercialization of such an artefact, but the fact that is an affordable technology for today’s state of art.

References

  • Baron-Cohen, S.: Zero Degrees of Empathy: A New Theory of Human Cruelty. Penguin, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendel, O.: Sex robots from the perspective of machine ethics. In: Cheok, A.D., Devlin, K., Levy, D. (eds.) LSR 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10237, pp. 17–26. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57738-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C.L.: Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, E.: Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68, 627–652 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh, M.: Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration. Ethics Inf. Technol. 12(3), 209–221 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox-George, C., Bewley, S.: I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry. BMJ Sex Reprod. Health 44, 161–164 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, J.: Robotic rape and robotic child sexual abuse: should they be criminalized? Crim. Law Philos. 11(1), 71–95 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, K.: In defence of sex machines: why trying to ban sex robots is wrong. In: The Conversation (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel, D.J.: The rights of machines: caring for robotic care-givers. In: van Rysewyk, S.P., Pontier, M. (eds.) Machine Medical Ethics. ISCASE, vol. 74, pp. 151–166. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel, D.J.: Robot Rights. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018a)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel, D.J.: The other question: can and should robots have rights? Ethics Inf. Technol. 20(2), 87–99 (2018b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D., Loebner, H.: Robot prostitutes as alternatives to human sex workers. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, vol. 14 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D.: Love+Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships. Duckworth Overlook, London (2009a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D.: The ethical treatment of artificially conscious robots. Int. J. Social Robot. 1(3), 209–216 (2009b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D.: The ethics of robot prostitutes. In: Robots Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, pp. 223–231 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, N.C., Eimler, S., von der Pütten, A., Payr, S.: Theory of companions: what can theoretical models contribute to applications and understanding of human-robot interaction? Appl. Artif. Intell. 25(6), 474–502 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maras, M.H., Shapiro, L.R.: Child sex dolls and robots: more than just an uncanny valley. J. Internet Law 21, 3–17 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolò, A.M.: Appunti a proposito di una teoria dei rapporti soggettuali. Interazioni 2(20), 55–61 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T.H.: The Primitive Edge of Experience. Karnak, London (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K.: Sex robot matters: slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 35(2), 46–53 (2016a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K.: Technological animism: the uncanny personhood of humanoid machines. Soc. Anal. 60(1), 110–128 (2016b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K.: The asymmetrical ‘relationship’: parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. ACM SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 45(3), 290–293 (2016c)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strikwerda, L.: Present and future instances of virtual rape in light of three categories of legal philosophical theories on rape. Philos. Technol. 28(4), 491–510 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, N., Sharkey, A.: The crying shame of robot nannies: an ethical appraisal. Interact. Stud. 11(2), 161–190 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, N.: The ethical frontiers of robotics. Science 322(5909), 1800–1801 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheutz, M.: 13 The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and social robots. In: Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, p. 205 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, R.: Robots in aged care: a dystopian future? AI Soc. 31(4), 445–454 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, R.: Robots, rape, and representation. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9(4), 465–477 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, N.M., Lazar, A., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S.: Of dolls and men: anticipating sexual intimacy with robots. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 26(3), 13 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullins, J.P.: Robots, love, and sex: the ethics of building a love machine. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 3(4), 398–409 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavani, H.: Can social robots qualify for moral consideration? Reframing the question about robot rights. Information 9(4), 73 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S., Taggart, W., Kidd, C.D., Dasté, O.: Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship. Connection Sci. 18(4), 347–361 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D.W.: Creativity and its origins. In: Essential Papers on the Psychology of Women, pp. 132–145 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piercosma Bisconti Lucidi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bisconti Lucidi, P., Piermattei, S. (2020). Sexual Robots: The Social-Relational Approach and the Concept of Subjective Reference. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Multimodal and Natural Interaction. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12182. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49062-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49062-1_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49061-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49062-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics