Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics ((STAR,volume 140))

  • 331 Accesses

Abstract

In many aerial robot applications such as search and rescue, the task consists on providing assistance in hostile environments such as mountains or civil areas after natural catastrophes. In this scenarios it is very likely that the terrain is not flat, making the landing and takeoff maneuvers of the aerial robot very complicate and unsafe. In contact-free conditions, the complexity of the task is increased by the underactuation of standard unidirectional-thrust aerial vehicle. In this chapter we shall show that the use of physical interaction, and in this case exploiting the tether, a unidirectional-thrust aerial vehicle can perform the task in a much robust and reliable way. In this chapter we will provide a formal study of the problem, proving the superiority of the tethered system. We shall then how how the results of Chap. 4 have been exploited to perform the task. A simple but effective trajectory generator is also derived for the particular task. Real experiments are presented validating the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The equal interesting but unusual case of an arbitrary \(\mathcal {P}_{RL}\) is left as future work.

  2. 2.

    In this chapter, since the length of the link is constant, l is not a generalized variable but becomes a parameter of the system.

  3. 3.

    When \(\left\Vert {\mathbf {P}}^S_{xy}{\mathbf {z}}_W\right\Vert = 0\) the surface is horizontal and any \({\mathbf {d}}\) such that (6.9) holds, satisfies Condition (4). In this condition, one can still land with the tethered configuration keeping \({f_L}= 0\) and using the same method for contact-free flight.

  4. 4.

    This can be guaranteed by the controllers proposed in Sects. 4.5.2 and 4.6.2.

  5. 5.

    The method can be easily modified according to any VTOL.

  6. 6.

    http://www.aeroarms-project.eu/.

References

  1. Cabecinhas, D., Naldi, R., Marconi, L., Silvestre, C., Cunha, R.: Robust take-off for a quadrotor vehicle. IEEE Trans. Robot. 28(3), 734–742 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mellinger, D., Michael, N., Kumar, V.: Trajectory generation and control for precise aggressive maneuvers with quadrotors. Int. J. Robot. Res. 31(5), 664–674 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mueller, M.W., Hehn, M., D’Andrea, R.: A computationally efficient algorithm for state-to-state quadrocopter trajectory generation and feasibility verification. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3480–3486, Tokyo, Japan (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, P., Devasia, S., Paden, B.: A different look at output tracking: control of a VTOL aircraft. Automatica 32(1), 101–107 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tognon, M., Testa, A., Rossi, E., Franchi, A.: Takeoff and landing on slopes via inclined hovering with a tethered aerial robot. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1702–1707, Daejeon, South Korea (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tognon, M., Franchi, A.: Landing and take-off on/from sloped and non-planar surfaces with more than 50 degrees of inclination. In: 9th International Micro Air Vehicles Conference, pp. 97–102 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faessler, M., Franchi, A., Scaramuzza, D.: Differential flatness of quadrotor dynamics subject to rotor drag for accurate tracking of high-speed trajectories. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3(2), 620–626 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohta, K., Kumar, V., Daniilidis, K.: Vision-based control of a quadrotor for perching on lines. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3130–3136 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Houska, B., Ferreau, H., Diehl, M.: ACADO Toolkit - an open source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization. Opt. Control Appl. Methods 32(3), 298–312 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gioioso, G., Ryll, M., Prattichizzo, D., Bülthoff, H.H., Franchi, A.: Turning a near-hovering controlled quadrotor into a 3D force effector. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 6278–6284, Hong Kong, China (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franchi, A., Mallet, A.: Adaptive closed-loop speed control of BLDC motors with applications to multi-rotor aerial vehicles. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 5203–5208, Singapore (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. video 1: Takeoff and landing on slopes via inclined hovering with a tethered aerial robot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01UYN289YXk (2016)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Tognon .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tognon, M., Franchi, A. (2021). Theory and Experiments for a Practical Usecase. In: Theory and Applications for Control of Aerial Robots in Physical Interaction Through Tethers. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 140. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48659-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics