Advertisement

Free Will and Indeterminism

  • Danny Frederick
Chapter
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism book series (PASTCL)

Abstract

After a brief historical introduction to the problem of free will I explain the simple theory of free will as an undetermined act. The popular claim that free will, so understood, is incoherent arises from a failure to distinguish acts from other events. I employ action theory to explain some complications of free action. I dispose of some objections, including those from Frankfurt-type cases and the infinite regress arguments of H. A. Prichard and Gilbert Ryle. I give a brief indication of the confusions endemic to contemporary philosophical discussions of free will to be found in Roderick Chisholm, Donald Davidson, Laura Ekstrom, John Martin Fischer, Harry Frankfurt, Robert Kane, Hugh McCann, Alfred Mele, Robert Nozick, Helen Steward, Richard Taylor and many others. I conclude by noting or commenting on some outstanding questions including the problem of addictions and compulsions.

References

  1. Chisholm, Roderick. 1982. Human Freedom and the Self. In Free Will, ed. Gary Watson, 24–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, Donald. 1982. Essays on Actions and Events. Reprinted with Corrections. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  3. Descartes, René. 1931. The Passions of the Soul. In Philosophical Works, Vol. 1. Trans. Elizabeth Haldane and G.R.T. Ross, Corrected ed., 329–427. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ekstrom, Laura. 2000. Free Will. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  5. Feyerabend, Paul. 1981. On the Interpretation of Scientific Theories. In Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method, 37–43. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Findlay, J.N. 1970. The Teaching of Meaning. In Ascent to the Absolute, 78–89. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Fischer, John Martin. 2007. Compatibilism. In Four Views on Free Will, ed. J.M. Fischer, R. Kane, D. Pereboom, and M. Vargas, 44–84. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald, P.F. 1970. Voluntary and Involuntary Acts. In The Philosophy of Action, ed. Alan R. White, Corrected ed., 120–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Frankfurt, Harry. 1969. Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 66 (23): 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frederick, Danny. 2010a. Unmotivated Intentional Action. Philosophical Frontiers 5 (1): 21–30.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2010b. Popper and Free Will. Studia Philosophica Estonica 3 (1): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2012. Critique of an Argument for the Reality of Purpose. Prolegomena: Journal of Philosophy 11 (1): 25–34.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2013a. Popper, Rationality and the Possibility of Social Science. THEORIA: An International Journal for the Theory, History and Foundations of Science 28 (1): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2013b. Free Will and Probability. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (1): 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayek, Friedrich. 1978. The Errors of Constructivism. In his New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, 3–22. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hobart, R.E. 1934. Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It. Mind 43 (169): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hornsby, Jennifer. 1980. Actions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Kane, Robert. 2007. Libertarianism. In Four Views on Free Will, ed. J.M. Fischer, R. Kane, D. Pereboom, and M. Vargas, 5–43. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Kant, Immanuel. 1898. The Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Thomas Kingsmill Abbot. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  20. Kuhn, Thomas. 1977. The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laplace, Pierre-Simon. 1902. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Trans. F.W. Truscott and F.L. Emory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Locke, John. 1959. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Collated and Annotated by Alexander Campbell Fraser. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  23. McCann, Hugh. 1998. The Works of Agency. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mele, Alfred. 1995. Autonomous Agents. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2003. Motivation and Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pollard, Bill. 2005. The Rationality of Habitual Actions. Proceedings of the Durham-Bergen Postgraduate Philosophy Seminar 1: 39–50.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2006. Explaining Actions with Habits. American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1): 57–68.Google Scholar
  29. Popper, Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1973. Objective Knowledge, Corrected ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1982. The Open Universe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1994. Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Popper, Karl, and John Eccles. 1983. The Self and its Brain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  34. Prichard, H.A. 2002. Acting, Willing, Desiring. In Moral Writings, 272–281. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Russell, Bertrand. 1910. The Elements of Ethics. In Philosophical Essays, 1–58. New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
  36. Ryle, Gilbert. 1970. The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Steward, Helen. 2012. A Metaphysics for Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor, Richard. 1966. Action and Purpose. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  39. van Inwagen, Peter. 2002. Free Will Remains a Mystery. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed. Robert Kane, 158–177. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danny Frederick
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ScholarYeovilUK

Personalised recommendations