Skip to main content

Protection Standards in Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Contribution in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Economic Perspectives

Abstract

Since the mid-1980s, most countries, especially the developing, have become more open to foreign direct investment (FDI) aiming to benefit from its fiscal development contributions, as countries with a high level of investment systematically achieve higher levels of development. Accordingly, bilateral investment treaties (BITs) guarantee certain standards of treatment. However, there are various concerns related to the effectiveness of BITs at large and of their investment protection standards especially to promote inflows of FDI, as there are opinions indicating that many multinational enterprises do not appear to take BITs into account when determining their investment plan abroad. This paper purports at first to examine the most important investment protection standards provided by BITs, in order to connect these standards with the main host country determinants for attracting FDI. In addition, it explores the possible impact of BITs on FDI inflows, since they are the key instrument in the strategies of most countries to attract foreign investors. The present paper in order to assess the importance of BITs examines several studies that explore the impact of BITs on FDI inflows, concluding that higher number of BITs raise the FDI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agreement between the Argentine Republic and the Kingdom of Spain on the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments, signed on 3 October 1991, entered into force 28 September 1992 (Argentina-Spain BIT) [online]. Accessed January 13, 2019, from https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/documents/documents/BIT-0008%20-%20Argentina-Spain%20(1991)%20[english%20translation]%20UNTS.pdf

  • Agreement between the Republic of Chile and the Kingdom of Spain for the Reciprocal Protection and Promotion of Investments, signed on 2 October 1991, entered into force 28 March 1994 (Chile-Spain BIT) [online]. Accessed January 13, 2019, from https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201774/volume-1774-i-30883-english.pdf

  • Bhasin, N., & Manocha, R. (2016). Do bilateral investment treaties promote FDI inflows? Evidence from India. Vikalpa, 41(4), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitzenis, A. (2014). International entrepreneurship and investments. Athens: Stamoulis Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, K. (2008). National treatment. In A. Reinisch (Ed.), Standards of investment protection (pp. 29–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, M., Koniger, J., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2008). FDI promotion through bilateral investment treaties: More than a bit? Review of World Economics, 146(1), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Li, C., & Whalley, J. (2017). The impact of BITs and DTTs on FDI inflow and outflow: Evidence from China. In M. Agarwal, J. Wang, & J. Whalley (Eds.), The economies of China and India cooperation and conflict Volume 2: Competitiveness, external cooperation strategy and income distribution: Changes in China (pp. 71–94). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik, A. (2019). Determinants of foreign direct investment from OECD countries in Poland. Eurasian Economic Review, 10, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. (2013). State responsibility - The general part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delitheou, V. (2011). Foreign direct investment and its role in the development of Greece. Economia. Seria Management, 14(1), 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolzer, R., & Stevens, M. (1995). Bilateral investment treaties. Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Republic of Germany Ministry for Economics and Technology. (2008). German Model Treaty, [online] Accessed April 22, 2019, from https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/archive/ita1025.pdf

  • Grosse, R., & Trevino, L. (2005). New institutional economics and FDI location in central and Eastern Europe. Management International Review, 45(2), 124–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, S. (2010). Do the European Union’s bilateral investment treaties matter? The way forward after Lisbon. CEPS Working Document No. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, V. (2008). Arbitrary and unreasonable measures. In A. Reinisch (Ed.), Standards of investment protection (pp. 87–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. (2000). Emilio Agustin Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Award 13 November 2000). [online]. Accessed April 22, 2019, from https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0481.pdf

  • International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. (2001). Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc., and AS Baltoil v. The Republic of Estonia (ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award 25 June 2001). [online]. Accessed April 22, 2019, from https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0359.pdf

  • International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. (2009). EDF (Services) Limited v. Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/13, Award 8 October 2009). [online]. Accessed April 22, 2019, from https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0267.pdf

  • International Law Commission. (2001). Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol. II, Part Two. [online]. Accessed April 22, 2019, from https://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_2001_v2_p2.pdf

  • International Law Commission. (2007). Most-favoured-nation clause—Report of the Working Group, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.719. [online]. Accessed April 22, 2019, from http://legal.un.org/docs/?symbol=A/CN.4/L.719

  • Mina, W. (2010). DO bilateral investments treaties encourage FDI in the GCC countries? African Review of Economics and Finance, 2(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montt, S. (2009). State liability in investment treaty arbitration: Global constitutional and administrative law in the BIT generation. Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E., & Spess, L. (2005). Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries? World Development, 33(10), 1567–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salacuse, J., & Sullivan, N. (2005). Do BITs really work?: An evaluation of bilateral investment treaties and their grand bargain. Harvard International Law Journal, 46(1), 67–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreuer, C. (2001). The ICSID convention: A commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenberger, G. (1957). International law as applied by international courts and tribunals (3rd ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirr, G., Garvey, J., & Liam, G. (2016). Bilateral investment treaties and foreign direct investment: Evidence of asymmetric effects on vertical and horizontal investments. Development Policy Review, 35(1), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sornarajah, Μ. (2000). The settlement of foreign investment disputes. Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Estonia concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment, signed 19 April 1994. [online]. Accessed January 13, 2019, from https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/43560.pdf

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2003). World Investment Report 2003: FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives, [online]. Accessed April 22, 2019, from http://unctad.org/en/docs/wir2003light en.pdf

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2009). The role of international investment agreements in attracting foreign direct investment to developing countries, [online]. Accessed April 22, 2019, from https://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20095 en.pdf

  • Vandevelde, K. J. (2005). A brief history of international investment agreements. UC Davis Journal of International Law & Policy, 12(1), 157–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasciannie, S. (2000). The fair and equitable treatment standard in international investment law and practice. The British Year Book of International Law, 70(1), 99–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yannaca-Small, K. (2008). Fair and equitable standard: Recent developments. In A. Reinisch (Ed.), Standards of investment protection (pp. 111–130). Oxford, UK: Oxford University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Argyrios Benteniotis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Benteniotis, A., Delitheou, V., Podimatas, E. (2020). Protection Standards in Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Contribution in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Tony-Okeke, U. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 15/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48531-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics