Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Summary and Implications of the Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance

  • 1044 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter summarises the role and importance of the Board of Directors with the performance of firms. The chapter also highlights the importance of the Board as one of the most important internal governance mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rashid and Lodh (2008), Rashid et al. (2010), Ameer (2013), Naim (1996), Abdullah (2006), Wang and Oliver (2009), Kumar and Singh (2012), Latif et al. (2013), Makki and Lodhi (2013).

References

  • Abdullah, S. N. (2006). Board Structure and Ownership in Malaysia: The Case of Distressed Listed Companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(5), 582–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameer, B. (2013). Corporate Governance—Issues and Challenges in Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(4), 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badele, C. S., & Fundeanu, D. (2014). Policy’s Beneficiaries of Corporate Governance and Diversification Strategy. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 468–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. (2007). Why Do Countries Matter so Much for Corporate Governance? Journal of Financial Economics, 86, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javed, A. Y., & Iqbal, R. (2008). Ownership Concentration, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 47(4), 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N. K., Kakabads, A. K., & Kouzmin, A. (2001). Board Governance and Company Performance: Any Correlations? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(1), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2012). Outside Directors, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Indian. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(2), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latif, B., et al. (2013). Impact of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance: Evidence from Sugar Mills of Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, G. F. (2001). An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models (3rd ed.). Amsterdam: Spencer Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makki, M. A. M., & Lodhi, S. A. (2013). Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 33(2), 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M. (1996). From Supplicants to Shareholders: Developing Countries and the World Bank. In G. K. Helleiner (Ed.), The International Monetary and Financial System (pp. 293–323). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pye, A., & Pettigrew, A. (2005). Studying Board Context, Process and Dynamics: Some Challenges for the Future. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A., De Zoysa, A., Lodh, S., & Rudkin, K. (2010). Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 4(1), 76–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A., & Lodh, S. C. (2008). The Influence of Ownership Structures and Board Practices on Corporate Social Disclosures in Bangladesh. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunday, O. K. (2008). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: The Case of Nigerian Listed Firms. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, Issue, 14, 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Oliver, J. (2009). Board Composition and Firm Performance Variance: Australian Evidence. Accounting Research Journal, 22(2), 196–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London, UK

    Dr. Naeem Tabassum

  2. Dubai Business School, University of Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Dr. Satwinder Singh

Authors
  1. Dr. Naeem Tabassum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Satwinder Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naeem Tabassum .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tabassum, N., Singh, S. (2020). Summary and Implications of the Study. In: Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48527-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation