Skip to main content

Doing Qualitative Research on Stalking Victimisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Victims of Stalking

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology ((PSVV))

  • 838 Accesses

Abstract

Doing qualitative research on stalking victimisation can be challenging given the elusive and often dangerous nature of the behaviours involved and the need of victims to remain hidden, the lack of a generally accepted definition and persistent socio-cultural misunderstandings about what stalking is and who can perpetrate it. While carrying out my study I often felt walking a tightrope, remaining alert and focused on keeping the balance between methodological correctness and duty of care towards victims who accepted to voice and share their experiences with me. This chapter overviews, describes and explains the methodological rationale, choices and ethical framework guiding my study. It explains and reflects on different difficulties, dilemmas and challenges I experienced during my fieldwork (e.g. access, safety, trauma) and offers some insights on emotionality, reflexivity and what, in my view, it takes to carry out in-depth, qualitative research in interpersonal and gender-based violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baez, B. (2002). Confidentiality in Qualitative Research: Reflections on Secrets, Power and Agency. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. (2008). First Steps in Qualitative Data Analysis: Transcribing. Family Practice, 25, 127–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, P., & Richards, L. (2000). The NVivo Qualitative Project Book. Thousand Oaks; London: The Alden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, K. R. (1993). Interviewing Survivors of Marital Rape: Doing Feminist Research on Sensitive Topics. In C. M. Renzetti & R. M. Lee (Eds.), Researching Sensitive Topics (pp. 197–211). Newbury Park, CA; London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M., & Miller, T. (2000). Inviting Intimacy: The Interview as Therapeutic Opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(3), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björklund, K., Häkkänen-Nyholm, H., Sheridan, L., & Roberts, K. (2010). The Prevalence of Stalking Among University Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(4), 684–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, M. (1998). An Exploration of the Experiences and Needs of Former Intimate Stalking Victims. Final Report Submitted to the National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods (3rd ed.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, T., & Mattinson, J. (2000). The Extent and the Nature of Stalking: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. W., Harner, H., Baker, T., Hartman, C. R., & Lole, C. (2001). Batterers’ Stalking Patterns. Journal of Family Violence, 16(3), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burman, M. J., Batchelor, S. A., & Brown, J. A. (2001). Researching Girls and Violence: Facing the Dilemmas of Fieldwork. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, K. (2013). Infertile? The Emotional Labour of Sensitive and Feminist Research Methodologies. Qualitative Research, 13(5), 546–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J., Astbury, J., Dartnall, E., & Limjerwala, S. (2014). A Qualitative Exploration of Researcher Trauma and Researchers’ Responses to Investigating Sexual Violence. Violence Against Women, 20(1), 95–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J., & Mudaly, N. (2010). Staying Safe: Strategies for Qualitative Child Abuse Researchers. Child Abuse Review, 19, 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. A. (2008) Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others (2nd ed.). London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2009). Researching Sensitive Topics: Qualitative Research as Emotion Work. Qualitative Research, 9(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, A., & Mauthner, N. (2002). Knowing Responsibly: Linking Ethics, Research Practice and Epistemology. In M. L. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in Qualitative Research (pp. 123–145). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. D. (1985). Creative Interviewing. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. S., & Dutton D. G. (2001). Assessing the Link Between Stalking and Domestic Violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(6), 519–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressing, H., Kuehner, C., & Gass, P. (2005). Lifetime Prevalence and Impact of Stalking in a European Population: Epidemiological Data from a Middle-Sized German City. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187(2), 168–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (1993). An Education in Interviewing: Placing the Researcher and the Research. In C. M. Renzetti & R. M. Lee (Eds.), Researching Sensitive Topics (pp. 181–196). Newbury Park, CA; London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., Ferris, K. O., & Gardner, B. C. (1998). On Being Stalked. Social Problems, 45(3), 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Fisher, B. S. (2011). Method Behind the Madness: An Examination of Stalking Measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(1), 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fremouw, W. J., Westrup, D., & Pennypacker, J. (1997). Stalking on Campus: The Prevalence and Strategies for Coping with Stalking. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42(4), 666–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, Reflexivity and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. M. (1998). The Victims of Stalking. In J. R. Meloy (Ed.), The Psychology of Stalking (pp. 113–137). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2010). Reproducing or Constructing? Some Questions About Transcription in Social Research. Qualitative Research, 10(5), 553–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (2007). Emotions and Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(3), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, C. E., Wilcox, P., & Pritchard, A. J. (2007). Stalking Acknowledgement and Reporting Among College Women Experiencing Intrusive Behaviors: Implications for the Emergence of a “Classic Stalking Case”. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 556–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infield, P., & Platford, G. (2000). The Law of Harassment and Stalking. West Sussex: Totell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (1988). How Women Define Their Experiences of Violence. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse (pp. 114–132). Newbury Park; London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., Burton, S., & Regan, L. (1994). Researching Women’s Lives or Studying Women’s Oppression? Reflections on What Constitutes Feminist Research. In M. Maynard & J. Purvis (Eds.), Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective (pp. 27–48). London; Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing Research in Sensitive Topics. London; Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. M., & Renzetti, C. M. (1993). The Problems of Researching Sensitive Topics: An Overview and Introduction. In C. M. Renzetti & R. M. Lee (Eds.), Researching Sensitive Topics (pp. 3–13). Newbury Park, CA; London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. K., & Cole, J. (2011). Exploring the Intersection of Partner Stalking and Sexual Abuse. Violence Against Women, 17(7), 904–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2009). Psychological Dominance or “Business as Usual”? Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 10(3), 247–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, N., Woodsong, C., Macqueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: Family Health International.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, T. (2011). Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process (4th ed.). Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw Hill, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, H. C. (2007). Stalking in the Context of Intimate Partner Abuse: In the Victims’ Words. Feminist Criminology, 2(4), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (1999). A Routine Activity Theory Explanation for Women’s Stalking Victimizations. Violence Against Women, 5(1), 43–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noaks, L., & Wincup, E. (2004). Criminological Research: Understanding Qualitative Methods. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (2000). Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L., Quirk, R., Rosenfeld, B., & O’Connor, M. (2004). Is It Stalking? Perceptions of Stalking Among College Undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(1), 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, S. (2001). Undermining the Sanitized Account: Violence and Emotionality in the Field in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N., & Henwood, K. (1996). Grounded Theory: Practical Implementation. In J. T. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences (pp. 86–101). Leicester: British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, M. J., & Miller-Day, M. (2007). Upward Turning Points and Positive Rapport-Development Across Time in Researcher-Participant Relationships. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 177–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radnedge, A. (2011, October 25). Madonna: My Fear of Stalker in My Home. Metro, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks; London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social Research (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L., Davies, G., & Boon, J. (2001). The Course and Nature of Stalking: A Victim Perspective. The Howard Journal, 40(3), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J. E., & Stanley, B. (1988). Ethical and Professional Dimensions of Socially Sensitive Research. American Psychologist, 43(1), 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text, and Interaction. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007). The State of the Art of Stalking: Taking Stock of the Emerging Literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 64–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Dunn, H., Bowen, E., & Gilchrist, E. A. (2018). Reporting Harassment and Stalking to the Police: A Qualitative Study of Victims’ Experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington: National Institute of Justice and Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Aa, S., & Groenen, A. (2011). Identifying the Needs of Stalking Victims and the Responsiveness of the Criminal Justice System: A Qualitative Study in Belgium and the Netherlands. Victims and Offenders, 6, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westrup, D., Fremouw, W. J., Thompson, R. N., & Lewis, S. F. (1999). The Psychological Impact of Stalking on Female Undergraduates. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44(3), 554–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, E., Gregory, A., Abrahams, H., Aghtaie, N., Walker, S. J., & Hester, M. (2020). Secondary Trauma: Emotional Safety in Sensitive Research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18, 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodby, L. L., Williams, B. R., Wittich, A. R., & Burgio, K. L. (2011). Expanding the Notion of Researcher Distress: The Cumulative Effects of Coding. Qualitative Health Research, 21(6), 830–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2011). The Criminological Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Korkodeilou .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Korkodeilou, J. (2020). Doing Qualitative Research on Stalking Victimisation. In: Victims of Stalking. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47793-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics