Skip to main content

Handle with Care: Adoption of Drone Delivery Services

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing (NB&PL 2020)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate consumers’ reactions toward drone delivery service. Qualitative data was collected based on comments posted following a YouTube video. A thematic inductive analysis was used in order to analyze the data based on YouTube participants’ comments. The results of this study revealed that similarly to any other forms of innovation, consumers’ expressed their resistance to this form of delivery in two forms: cognitive and affective. Taking into account that drone delivery service is still under the testing phase, this study was limited to finding sufficient and actual users who can contribute to the study with real and concrete concerns. This limitation restricts our understanding of consumers’ reactions to drone delivery service to theoretical assumptions. Commercial companies and retailers may benefit from this research to get a deeper understanding about the main consumers’ concerns and perceived risks towards the drone delivery service. Thus, this research may guide companies with ideas on how to better serve customers to increase the chances of adoption. Previous literature has largely explored the concept of technological innovations. However, no research to date has studied consumers’ reactions towards this new form of delivery service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartels, J., Reinders, M.J.: Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: a propositional inventory for future research. J. Bus. Res. 64(6), 601–609 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., Stewart, K.: A Delphi study of the drivers and inhibitors of Internet banking. Int. J. Bank Mark. 20(6), 250–260 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cenfetelli, R.T.: Inhibitors and enablers as dual factor concepts in technology usage. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 5(11), 16 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.S., Lee, H.J.: Optimal delivery routing with wider drone-delivery areas along a shorter truck-route. Expert Syst. Appl. 104, 307–317 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., Fiorito, S.S.: Self-service technology in retailing. The case of retail kiosks. Symphonya 1, 43–45 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelking, C.: Drone Delivery Services are Booming in China (2015). http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/drone360/2015/03/27/drone-delivery-china/#.WuXTapdRXIU

  • Hartmann, T., Fischer, M.: A process view on end-user resistance during construction IT implementations. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. (ITcon) 14(23), 353–365 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, S., Handrich, M.: What about passive innovation resistance? Investigating adoption-related behavior from a resistance perspective. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32(6), 878–903 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerss, M., Schröder, J., Neuhaus, F., Klink, C., Mann, F.: Parcel delivery: The future of last mile. McKinsey & Company (2016). https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel-transport-and-logistics/our-insights/how-customer-demands-are-reshaping-last-mile-delivery

  • Kleijnen, M., Lee, N., Wetzels, M.: An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. J. Econ. Psychol. 30(3), 344–357 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marakas, G.M., Hornik, S.: Passive resistance misuse: overt support and covert recalcitrance in IS implementation. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 5(3), 208–219 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, V., Ross Jr., W.T.: The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 76(3), 298–324 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Roundtree, R.I., Bitner, M.J.: Self-service technologies: understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. J. Mark. 64(3), 50–64 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orel, F.D., Kara, A.: Supermarket self-checkout service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty: empirical evidence from an emerging market. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 21(2), 118–129 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patsiotis, A.G., Hughes, T., Webber, D.J.: An examination of consumers’ resistance to computer-based technologies. J. Serv. Mark. 27(4), 294–311 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S., Sheth, J.N.: Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. J. Consum. Mark. 6(2), 5–14 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan, Z.B., Farah, M.F., Mrad, M.: An adapted TPB approach to consumers’ acceptance of service-delivery drones. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 29(7), 817–828 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J.: Understanding Motivation and Emotion. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, M.J.: Managing consumer resistance to innovations (No. 475). Rozenberg Publishers (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J.A.: Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol. Rev. 110(1), 145–172 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speier, C., Venkatesh, V.: The hidden minefields in the adoption of sales force automation technologies. J. Mark. 66(3), 98–111 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talke, K., Heidenreich, S.: How to overcome pro-change bias: incorporating passive and active innovation resistance in innovation decision models. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 31(5), 894–907 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A.G.: Theory of rejecting superior, new technologies. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 11(3/4), 25–43 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, W., Yu, E., Jung, J.: Drone delivery: Factors affecting the public’s attitude and intention to adopt. Telematics Inform. 35(6), 1687–1700 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maya F. Farah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Farah, M.F., Mrad, M., Ramadan, Z., Hamdane, H. (2020). Handle with Care: Adoption of Drone Delivery Services. In: Martinez-Lopez, F., Gázquez-Abad, J., Breugelmans, E. (eds) Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing. NB&PL 2020. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47764-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics