Abstract
Most people, in their daily lives, have a need for privacy – the need at times to left alone. Yet in the Internet age consumer readily reveal aspects of their private lives to a wide circle of contacts, most often via social media apps. Concurrently, big digital businesses such as Google and Facebook operate business models based upon lucrative income streams from the use and sharing of consumer’s personal data, a practice referred to as surveillance capitalism. This paper contrasts these two very different aspects of online privacy, social privacy and institutional privacy. The gathering of personal data on consumers is often portrayed by digital marketers and marketing academics as a commercial exchange between a consumer and firm, that is, the exchange of personal data for services or improved service. This exchange relationship has been portraying theoretically with reference to social contract theory and social exchange theory. However, this paper argues that to the extent consumers are not aware (a) what personal information is being taken from them, (b) what that information is used for, and (c) who that information is being shared with, then a social contract or social exchange does not exist. This issue of consumer’s online institutional privacy literary is a critical ethical question for the future practice of digital marketing. If consumers’ institutional privacy literacy is low, one can question if the gathering of personal data by digital business is accurately represented as a social contract, or if it is more accurately portrayed as an imbalanced exchange operating under conditions of information asymmetry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., Loewenstein, G.: Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221), 509–514 (2015)
Alkire, L., Pohlmann, J., Barnett, W.: Triggers and motivators of privacy protection behavior on Facebook. J. Serv. Mark. 33(1), 57–72 (2019)
Altman, I.: The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory and Crowding. Brooks/Cole Publishing, Monterey (1975)
Bartsch, M., Dienlin, T.: Control your Facebook: an analysis of online privacy literacy. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56, 147–154 (2016)
Bloom, P.N., Milne, G.R., Adler, R.: Avoiding misuse of new information technologies: legal and societal considerations. J. Mark. 58(1), 98–110 (1994)
Brookman, J., Rouge, P., Alva, A., Yeung, C.: Cross-device tracking: measurement and disclosures. Proc. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. 2017(2), 133–148 (2017)
European Union: General data protection regulation (GDPR) (2016). https://gdpr-info.eu/
Fowler, G.A.: It’s the middle of the night. Do you know who your iPhone is talking to? Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/05/28/its-middle-night-do-you-know-who-your-iphone-is-talking/. Accessed 29 May 2019
Fox, A.K., Royne, M.B.: Private information in a social world: assessing consumers’ fear and understanding of social media privacy. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 26(1–2), 72–89 (2018)
Hoofnagle, C.J., King, J., Li, S., Turow, J.: How different are young adults from older adults when it comes to information privacy attitudes and policies? (2010). http://ssm.com/abstract=1589864
Kelly, L., Kerr, G., Drennan, J.: Privacy concerns on social networking sites: a longitudinal study. J. Mark. Manag. 33(17–18), 1465–1489 (2017)
Korolov, M.: California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): What you need to know to be compliant. CSO. https://www.csoonline.com/article/3292578/california-consumer-privacy-act-what-you-need-to-know-to-be-compliant.html. Accessed 4 Oct 2019
Kurtz, C., Seemann, M., Schulz, W.: Towards a framework for information privacy in complex service ecosystems. Paper Presented at the Thirty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco (2018)
Lewis, P.: ‘Utterly horrifying’: ex-Facebook insider says covert data harvesting was routine. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/20/facebook-data-cambridge-analytica-sandy-parakilas. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
Martin, K.D., Murphy, P.E.: The role of data privacy in marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 45, 135–155 (2017)
Masur, P.K.: Reconceptualizing online privacy literacy. http://philippmasur.de/blog/2019/03/28/reconceptualizing-online-privacy-literacy/. Accessed 28 Mar 2019
Masur, P.K., Teutsch, D., Trepte, S.: Development and validation of the online privacy literacy scale. Diagnostica 63, 256–263 (2017a). 10.1026/0012-1924/a000179
Masur, P.K., Teutsch, D., Trepte, S.: OPLIS: online privacy literacy scale (2017b). http://www.oplis.de/index_eng.html
Palmatier, R.W., Martin, K.D.: The Intelligent Marketer’s Guide to Data Privacy: The Impact of Big Data on Customer Trust. Springer, Cham (2019)
Schwartz, B.: The social psychology of privacy. Am. J. Sociol. 73(6), 741–752 (1968)
Smith, H.J., Dinev, T., Xu, H.: Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Q. 35(4), 989–1016 (2011)
Warren, S., Brandeis, L.: The right to privacy. Harv. Law Rev. 4(5), 193–220 (1890)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abdul-Ghani, E. (2020). Consumers’ Online Institutional Privacy Literacy. In: Martínez-López, F.J., D'Alessandro, S. (eds) Advances in Digital Marketing and eCommerce. DMEC 2020. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47595-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47595-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47594-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47595-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)