Abstract
‘Power distance’ and ‘power relations’ are two concepts that have been repeatedly used to depict interactions between faculty and students, especially in uncivil learning environments. Different learning environments and corresponding pedagogical designs are often typified by different power relationships. The last several years have brought rapid changes to learning environments. New modes of teaching and learning as well as new communication strategies have been espoused as alternatives to the traditional, teacher-centered classroom model. Teachers in traditional classrooms, are largely, if not exclusively, responsible for setting goals, designing learning tasks and assessing progress. Traditional teacher-student relationships, described at length earlier in this book, are often perceived as an exhibition of authority and as the exercise of exclusive power by teachers. In contrast, in constructivist, student-centered classrooms, knowledge and authority are shared among teachers and students. The power structure that typifies traditional learning environments is similar to the structure that supports uncivil class encounters, while constructivist classrooms represent the opposite pole. This chapter describes the main tenets of constructivist pedagogy, centering on the shifts in control over the learning process, from external, as used in conventional and well-structured learning settings, to the students. It is through such shifts in power relationships between teachers and contemporary millennial students that constructivist approaches may mitigate academic incivility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abington-Pitre, A. (2015). Where did we go wrong? Eight characteristics of multicultural schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3, 99–103.
Alt, D. (2014). Using structural equation modeling and multidimensional scaling to assess students’ perceptions of the learning environment and justice experiences. International Journal of Educational Research, 69, 38–49.
Alt, D. (2015). Assessing the contribution of constructivist based academic learning environment to academic self-efficacy in higher education. Learning Environments Research, 18, 47–67.
Alt, D., & Itzkovich, Y. (2018). The connection between perceived constructivist learning environments and faculty uncivil authoritarian behaviors. Higher Education, 77(3), 437–454.
Alt, D. (2017). College students’ perceived learning environment and their social media engagement in activities unrelated to class work. Instructional Science, 45, 623–643.
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2018). Lifelong citizenship: Lifelong learning as a lever for moral and democratic values. Leiden & Boston: Brill and Sense Publishers.
Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206.
Assessment Tools for Higher Education Learning Environments [ASSET]. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.asset-erasmus.com/.
Beardon, T. (1995). Peer assisted learning and raising standards. In S. Goodlad (Ed.), Students as tutors and mentors (pp. 104–120). London: Kogan page.
Ben Ezer, G. (2012). From Winnicott’s potential space to mutual creative space: A principle for intercultural psychotherapy. Transcultural Psychiatry, 49(2), 323–339.
Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.
Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467–498.
Da-Silva, C., Ruiz, V. M. C., & Porlan, R. (2006). Evolution of the conceptions of a secondary education biology teacher: Longitudinal analysis using cognitive maps. Science Education, 91(3), 461–491.
Donnelly, D. F., McGarr, O., & O’Reilly, J. (2014). “Just Be Quiet and Listen to Exactly What He’s Saying”: Conceptualizing power relations in inquiry-oriented classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2029–2054.
Durán, R. P. (2010). Comments regarding the presentations by Margaret Heritage and Caroline Wylie on professional learning communities to support formative assessment in the classroom [PowerPoint slides]. Presented at the CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment, Detroit, MI.
Education for Employment Project. (2007). Teaching and learning in further and higher education: A handbook by the education for employment project. Retrieved from http://www.comp.dit.ie/dgordon/Publications/Contributor/e4/E4handbook.pdf.
Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2005). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. Science Education, 90(1), 68–93.
Erickson, F. (2010). Culture in society and in educational practices. In J. A. Banks, & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: issues and perspectives (7th ed., pp. 33–56). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Erstad, O. (2011). Weaving the context of digital literacy. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 295–310). London: Routledge.
Esmonde, I., & Caswell, B. (2010). Teaching mathematics for social justice in multicultural, multilingual elementary classrooms. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 244–254.
Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 247–284.
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. P. (1995). A dialogue: Culture, language and race. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 377–402.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural aiversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 43, 48–70.
Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. London: Continuum.
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (Eds.). (2007). Millennials go to college: Strategies for a new generation on campus (2nd ed.). Great Falls, Va.: Lifecourse Associates.
Järvelä, S., Hurme, T.-R., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Self- regulation and motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 330–345). London: Routledge.
Kang, R., & Hyatt, C. W. (2010). Preparing pre-service teachers for diversity: The power of multicultural narratives. SRATE Journal, 19(10), 44–51.
King, T. (2002, July). Development of student skills in reflective writing. Paper presented at the 4th World Conference of the International Consortium for Educational Development in Higher Education, Perth, Australia. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.136.2518.
Lachman, V. D. (2015). Ethical issues in the disruptive behaviors of incivility, bullying, and horizontal/ lateral violence. Urologic Nursing, 35(1), 39–43.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dream keepers: Successful teaching for African American students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Larsson, J. (2012). Traditions in transition: Reflections on teacher authority in late modernity. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:589221/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
Lorente, E., & Kirk, D. (2013). Alternative democratic assessment in PETE: An Action-research study exploring risks, challenges and solutions. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 77–96.
Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Changing objects in knowledge-creation practices. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 206–221). London: Routledge.
McMahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a digital lifestyle: millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. In Proceedings of the 22nd ASCILITE Conference, 4–7 December 2005 (pp. 421–431). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/49_McMahon%20&%20Pospisil.pdf.
Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20006.
Minick, N., Stone, C. A., & Forman, E. A. (1993). Introduction: Integration of individual, social, and institutional processes in accounts of children’s learning and development. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 3–15). New York: Oxford University Press.
Nicoletti, A., & Merriman, W. (2007). Teaching millennial generation students. Momentum, 38(2), 28–31.
Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (Ed.) (2005). Educating the net generation. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101a.pdf.
Patry, J.-L., Weinberger, A., Weyringer, S. & Nussbaumer, M. (2013). Combining values and knowledge education. In B. J. Irby, G. Brown, R. Lara-Alecio, & S. Jackson (Eds.) and R. A. Robles-Piña (Sect. Ed.), The handbook of educational theories (pp. 565–579). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Pelech, J., & Pieper, G. W. (2010). The comprehensive handbook of constructivist teaching. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Perret, J.-F. (2011). A new artifact in the trade: Notes on the arrival of a computer supported manufacturing system in a technical school. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 87–102). London: Routledge.
Price, C. (2009). Why don’t my students think I’m groovy? The new “R”s for engaging millennial learners. The Teaching Professor, 23. Retrieved from http://www.drtomlifvendahl.com/Millennial%20Characturistics.pdf.
Ramaekers, S. (2010). Multicultural education: Embeddedness, voice and change. Ethics and Education, 5(1), 55–66.
Reinsvold, L. A., & Cochran, K. F. (2012). Power dynamics and questioning in elementary science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 745–768.
Sengupta-Irving, T., & Enyedy, N. (2015). Why engaging in mathematical practices may explain stronger outcomes in affect and engagement: Comparing student-driven with highly guided inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(4), 550–592.
Topping, K. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 20–27.
Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem based learning meta-analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1061.
Walker, A., Leary, H., Hemlo-Silver, C. E., & Ertmer, P. A. (Eds.). (2015). Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows. United States of America: Purdue University Press.
Wegerif, R., & De Laat, M. (2011). Using Bakhtin to re-think the teaching of higher order thinking for the network society. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 313–329). London: Routledge.
Weyringer, S., Patry, J-L., & Weinberger, A. (2012). Values and knowledge education. Experiences with teacher trainings. In D. Alt, & R. Reingold (Eds.), Changes in teachers’ moral role. From passive observers to moral and democratic leaders (pp. 165–180). Rotterdam: Sense.
Wride, M. (2017). Guide to peer assessment. Academic Practice, University of Dublin, Trinity College.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Itzkovich, Y., Alt, D., Dolev, N. (2020). Tackling Academic Incivility by Shifting the Focus to Student-Centered Pedagogical Approaches. In: The Challenges of Academic Incivility. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46747-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46747-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46746-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46747-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)