Distant Pulse Oximetry

Part of the Bioanalysis book series (BIOANALYSIS, volume 9)


Vital sign observation such as heartbeat rate and oxygen saturation is essential in care situations. Clinical pulse oximetry solutions work contact-based by clips or otherwise fixed sensor units which have sometimes undesired impact on the patient. A typical example would be pre-term infants in neonatal care which require permanent monitoring and have a very fragile skin. This requires a regular change of the sensor unit location by the staff to avoid skin damage. To improve patient comfort and to reduce care effort, a feasibility study with a camera-based passive optical method for contactless pulse oximetry from a distance is performed. In contrast to most existing research on contactless pulse oximetry, a task-optimized multi-spectral sensor unit instead of a standard RGB-camera is proposed. This first allows to avoid the widely used green spectral range for distant heartbeat rate measurement, which is unsuitable for pulse oximetry due to nearly equal spectral extinction coefficients of saturated oxy-hemoglobin and non-saturated hemoglobin. Second, it also better addresses the challenge of the worse signal-to-noise ratio than in the contact-based or active measurement, e.g., caused by background illumination. Signal noise from background illumination is addressed in several ways. The key part is an automated reference measurement of background illumination by automated patient localization in the acquired images by extraction of skin and background regions with a CNN-based detector. Due to the custom spectral ranges, the detector is trained and optimized for this specific setup. Altogether, allowing a contactless measurement, the studied concept promises to improve the care of patients where skin contact has negative effects. This chapter summarizes a feasibility study. Clinical devices require further development.


  1. 1.
    Aarts, L.A., Jeanne, V., Cleary, J.P., Lieber, C., Nelson, J.S., Oetomo, S.B., Verkruysse, W.: Non-contact heart rate monitoring utilizing camera photoplethysmography in the neonatal intensive care unit. A pilot study. Early Hum. Dev. 89(12), 943–948 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fantini, S., Franceschini, M.A., Maier, J.S., Walker, S.A., Barbieri, B.B., Gratton, E.: Frequency-domain multichannel optical detector for noninvasive tissue spectroscopy and oximetry. Opt. Eng. 34(1), 32–42 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haque, M.A., Nasrollahi, K., Moeslund, T.B.: Esstimation of heartbeat peak locations and heartbeat rate from facial video. In: Scandinavian Conferenece on Image Analysis, pp. 269–281. Springer, Berlin (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Humphreys, K., Ward, T., Markham, C.: A CMOS camera-based pulse oximetry imaging system. In: IEEE Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Humphreys, K., Ward, T., Markham, C.: Noncontact simultaneous dual wavelength photoplethysmography: a further step toward noncontact pulse oximetry. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78(4), 044,304 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kong, L., Zhao, Y., Dong, L., Jian, Y., Jin, X., Li, B., Feng, Y., Liu, M., Liu, X., Wu, H.: Noncontact detection of oxygen satuartion based on visible light imaging device using ambient light. Opt. Express 21(15), 17464–17471 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kwon, S., Kim, H., Park, K.S.: Validation of heart rate extraction using video imaging on a built-in camera system of a smartphone. In. IEEE Conference on Engineering Medicine and Biology Society 2012, pp. 2174–2177 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional models for semantic segmentation. In: IEEE Conferenece on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lugarà, P.: Current approaches to non-invasive optical oximetry. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 21(3), 307–310 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Metzler, J., Kroschel, K, Willersinn, D.: Contactless multiple wavelength photoplethysmographic imaging: a first step toward SpO2 camera technology. In: SPIE Medical Imaging (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nitzan, M., Romem, A., Koppel, R.: Pulse oximetry: fundamentals and technology update. Med. Devices (Auckland, NZ) 7, 231 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tarassenko, L., Villarroel, M., Guazzi, A., Jorge, J., Clifton, D., Pugh, C.: Non-contact video-based vital sign monitoring using ambient light and auto-regressive models. Physiol. Meas. 35(5), 807 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Verkruysse, W., Bartula, M., Bresch, E., Rocque, M., Meftah, M., Kirenko, I.: Calibration of contactless pulse oximetry. Anesth. Analg. 124(1), 136 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Villarroel, M., Guazzi, A., Jorge, J., Davis, S., Watkinson, P., Green, G., Shenvi, A., Mc-Cormick, K., Tarassenko, L.: Continuous non-contact vital sign monitoring in neonatal intensive care unit. Healthcare Technol. Lett. 1(3), 87–91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wieringa, F., Mastik, F., Van der Steen, A.: Automatic detection of measurment points for non-contact vibrometer-based diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33(8), 1034–1041 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation IOSBKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations