Skip to main content

Bedside Mental Status Evaluation: Overview, Coconuts, Cobe-50

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Mentation Evaluation
  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

Current clinical neuroscientists and their domains of cognitive testing include neurologists, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, and speech and language clinicians, along with neuro-radiologists providing critical and complementary information of lesion location. All are important to capture the extent and nature of the deficits. For example, any degree of significant aphasia will curtail the number and type of testing that is possible. The abulic spectrum of disorders may severely limit testing and the mild and often covert forms of inattention due minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) with elevated ammonia level precludes in depth neuropsychological assessment. It is not unusual for people with MHE to present because of multiple motor vehicle accidents on account of their inattention. As with most frontal lobe syndromes, the spouse, family, or other informant is most important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Knopman DS, Ryberg S. A verbal memory test with high predictive accuracy for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Arch Neurol. 1989;46:141–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tariq NT, Chibnall JT, Perry HM III, Morley JE. The Saint Louis university mental status (SLUMS) examination for detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia is more sensitive than the mini-mental status examination (MMSE) a pilot study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14(11):900–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blessed G, Tomlinson BE, Roth M. The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile changes in the cerebral gray matter of elderly subjects. Br J Psychiatry. 1968;114:7970811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Pyschiatry Res. 1975;12:189–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips MA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal cognitive assessment MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kipps CM, Hodges JR. Cognitive assessment for clinicians. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(Suppl I):i22–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.059758. Kipps and Hodges 12-minute cognitive examination

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Libon DJ, Rascovsky K, Gross RG, et al. The Philadelphia Brief Assessment of Cognition (PBAC): a valisdated screening measure for dementia. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2011; 25(8):1314–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, et al. The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21:1078–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ismail Z, Agüera-Ortiz L, Brodaty H, et al. The mild behavioral impairment checklist (MBI-C): a rating scale for neuropsychiatric symptoms in pre-dementia populations. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56:929–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ismail Z, Smith EE, Geda Y, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms as early manifestations of emergent dementia: provisional diagnostic criteria for mild behavioral impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(2):195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freedman M, Leach L, Tartaglia MC et al. The Toronto Cognitive Assessment (TorCA): normative data and validation to detect amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer’s Research and Therapy 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0382

  12. Darvesh S, Leach L, Black SE, et al. The behavioral neurology assessment. Can J Neurol Sci. 2005;32:167–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grace J, Malloy PF. Frontal systems behavior scale. Lutz Florida 2002. PAR.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kertesz A, Davidson W, Fox H. Frontal behavioral inventory: diagnostic criteria for frontal lobe dementia. Can J Neurol Sci. 1997;24:29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB. A frontal assessment battery at the beside. Neurology. 2000;55:1621–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roth RM, Isquith PK, Gioia GA. BRIEF-A. Behavior rating inventory of executive function- adult version. PAR neuropsychological assessment resources Inc. 2005. Lutz Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Royall DR, Mahurin RK, Gray KF. Bedside assessment of executive cognitive impairment: the executive interview. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:1221–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bechara A. Iowa gambling test. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc, Lutz Fl 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boutoleau-Bretonnière C, Evrard C, Benoît Hardouin J, et al. DAPHNE: a new tool for the assessment of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra. 2015;5:503–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffmann M, Schmitt F, Bromley E. Comprehensive cognitive neurological assessment in stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;119:162–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crossley N, Mechelli A, Scott J, et al. The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders. Brain. 2014;137:2382–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Appendix 1: COCONUT: Comprehensive Cognitive Neurological Test

Name

Gender

Age

Education years (schooling, college, other)

----

Handedness (Epworth scale) circle

Right/left/ambidextrous

Cognitive risk factors (circle). Family history of Alzheimer’s, head trauma

Vascular risk factors. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, ethanol abuse homocysteine elevation, cardiac disease, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, patent foramen ovale, dilated cardiac chamber, leukoaraiosis, BMI ≥30

Neuropsychiatric history (DSM V) circle. Depression, anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, substance abuse

General Attentional Systems

1. Orientation 5 items – Score 1 for each error, 0 is normal

Date (3 for day, month, year), day of week (1), place hospital (or clinic) (1)

/5

2. Attention and calculation – Score 1 for each error, 0 is normal

5 serial 7’s, if unable double to 128

/5

Left Hemisphere Network for Language, Gerstmann’s, and Angular Gyrus Syndromes

3. Speech and language – Score 1 for each error, 0 is normal

Naming: Name 3 objects (pen, watch, ID card) and name 3 colors

Fluency: Grade as fluent (0), non-fluent (1), mute (2)

Comprehension: Close your eyes, squeeze my hand. Score 1 for each failure

/6

/2

/2

Repetition: “Today is a sunny and windy day.” No word repeated (2), partial (1), all (0)

/2

Write a sentence. What is your job? Must contain subject and verb and makes sense

/3

Reading: “Close your eyes.” No words read (2), partial (1), or all words (0)

/2

4. Motor speech

Dysarthria. During interview, are words slurred? Nil (0), mild slurring 1, marked slurring (2)

/2

Hypophonia. Normal (0), voice softer than normal (1), very low volume, barely audible (2)

/2

5. Praxis

Rating scale: Impaired 1, unable 2, smooth execution 0

Melokinetic. Thumb – finger opposition test compare R + L (only if ≥4/5 power)

/2

Buccolingual. Licks your lips, blows up your cheeks

/2

Ideomotor apraxia. Clumsy action with pen or eating utensils

/2

Ideational. Folds piece of paper in half, writes your name, and places inside a file or book

/2

6. Right, left, and body part orientation

Left pointing finger on right ear (one point for each error)

/2

Hippocampal Limbic Network for Memory and Emotion

7. Memory – Score 1 for each error, 0 is normal

Short-term memory: Registers five words (orange, ocean, courage, rapid, building)

Test recall at 5 min. Score 1 for each omission

/5

Remote memory: Recites last 3 presidents or 3 important personal dates (graduations)

/3

8. Emotions

Lability – Laughs or cries easily, out of context. Rarely (1), sometimes (2)

Frequently (3), never (0)

/3

Geschwind-Gastaut syndrome: Stroke or new lesion induced with new evidence of viscous personality, metaphysical pre-occupation, and altered physiological drives

(i) Viscous personality: One or more of the following. Circumstantiality in speech, over-inclusive verbal discourse, excessive detail of information, stickiness of thought processes, interpersonal adhesiveness, prolongation of interpersonal encounters, and hypergraphia

(ii) Metaphysical pre-occupation: One or more of the following: Overly philosophical pre-occupation, nascent and excessive intellectual interests in religion, philosophy and moral issues.

(iii) Altered physiological drives: One or more of the following: Hyposexuality, aggression, and fear

Scoring: Two out of three components required for diagnosis

Score as 3 components (3), 2 components (2), 1 component (1), nil (0)

/3

Prefrontal Network and Subcortical Network for Executive Function and Comportment

9. Serial motor programming: Luria motor sequence test (fist-palm-hand). Demonstrate

sequence until patient able to replicate. Then do 5 cycles

Score 1 for each error in sequence

/5

10. Word fluency. Says as many words starting with S in 1 min (no names or places)

Grading: >15 (0), 13–15 (1), 10–12 (2), 7–9 (3), 4–6 (4), 0–3 (5)

/5

11. Environmental autonomy (imitation and utilization behavior)

Imitation behavior. Maintaining eye contact, pats side of examiner’s face, and then

claps the hands without suggesting patient to follow suit

Scoring: Copies all actions spontaneously (2,) copies some (1), nil (0)

/2

Utilization behavior: Places three objects in front of patient, key, cell phone, and pen

Scoring: Unsolicited manipulation of 1 or 2 objects (1) or all (2)

/2

12. Interference and inhibitory control (Go-No-Go paradigm)

If examiner taps once, raise your finger; if examiner taps twice, do not raise finger

Do three cycles: 1-1-2, 1-2-1, 2-2-1. Score 1 for each incorrect response

/3

13. Abulia . Poverty of action and speech. Grade as marked 2, somewhat 1, nil 0

/2

14. Disinhibition : Comments or actions during interview. Occasional 1, frequent 2, nil 0

/2

15. Impersistence . Discontinues Luria’s sequences, despite repeated coaxing x 3

/1

16. Perseveration. During Luria sequence test, duplicates same hand position

/1

Dorsal Right Parieto-Frontal Network for Visuospatial Function, Attention, Emotion, and Prosody

17. Visuospatial

Copy a 2D image of examiner’s drawn flower. Impaired 1, marked 2, nil 0

/2

Copy a 3D image representation of examiner’s cube. Impaired 1, marked 2, nil 0

/2

18. Neglect syndromes

Tactile. Simultaneous stimulation of both arms. Omission of one side score 1

/1

Auditory. Simultaneous stimulation of both ears. Omission of one side score 1

/1

Visual. Simultaneous stimulation of both fields. Omission of one side score 1

/1

Motor neglect. Bisect 10 cm line. More than 1/4 (2.5 cm) distance from midline, score 1

/1

19. Anosognosia

Recognizes weakness 0, underestimation 1, or complete denial of deficit or illness 2

/2

20. Prosody

As per family, speech has become flat or monotone, then score 1; if not score 0

/1

Cannot comprehend different intonations (happy/sad), then score 1; if not score 0

/1

Cannot repeat altered intonation (happy/sad), then score 1; if not score 0

/1

Ventral Occipitotemporal Network for Object and Face Recognition

21. Complex visual processing (a score of 0 is normal)

Object agnosia. Cannot name 3 objects by visual inspection, but can by touch or sound

/3

Achromatopsia. Cannot distinguish 2 different hues or colors. Score 1 for each error

/2

Simultanagnosia. CTPT – identifies all 3 persons (score 0, 1, 2, 3) or analog time telling (m/h/sec)

/3

Optic ataxia. Touches examiners finger under visual guidance. Score 1 for a miss

/1

Optic apraxia. Looks left, right, up, or down to command. Score 1 for any error

/1

Prosopagnosia: Does not recognize family or friends by visual appearance, score 1

/1

Line orientation. Draws 45° and 30° lines. Match 2 lines to figure. Score 1 for error

/2

Subjective report of impaired motion perception (akinetopsia). Score 1 if present

/1

Subjective report of depth perception impairment (astereopsis). Score 1 if present

/1

Hallucinations. Simple (colors, shapes), complex (scenes, people, animals), or experiential (out of body experience or autoscopy). Score 1 if present

/1

Illusions of shape or size. Score 1 if present. Example macropsia or micropsia

/1

Denial of cortical blindness (Anton’s syndrome). Score 1 if present

/1

Syndromes with Ill-Defined Neural Networks

22. Disconnection syndromes Score 1 if present, 0 if absent

Alien hand syndrome. The one hand interferes with the other during routine tasks

/1

Alexia without agraphia. Can write but cannot read

/1

Pure word deafness. Hears environmental sounds but not spoken speech

/1

23. Delusional misidentification syndromes (incorrect ID of people or place). If present 1

Reduplicative paramnesia (the person thinks that they are geographically in a different location such as at the office or at home, when in fact they may be lying in a hospital bed)

/1

Capgras or Fregoli syndrome. Familiar people appear strange or vice versa

/1

Miscellaneous Syndromes

Amusia – May be receptive (poor appreciation of music) or expressive (where no longer able to play or sing). Score 1 if either is present

/1

Allesthesia. During neurological examination, transfers perceived tactile stimuli from left to the right or vice versa

/1

Autoscopy. During interview, reports out of body experience

/1

Synesthesia. Activation of one sensory system induces perceived sensation in another

/1

Geographical disorientation or Topographical Disorientation

/1

Cognitive score total

---

  1. CTPT cookie theft picture test

Appendix 2: Cobe 20: High Value Hub Screen

1. Language: Ability to communicate and engage in cognitive testing

 Comprehension: Closes your eyes and makes a fist; if both correct score 1

1/1

 Fluency: If no hesitations or paraphasias, naming cell phone, pen; if correct score 1

1/1

2. Attention, abulia

 Abulia: Poverty of speech, actions, slowed instruction processing. If no abulia score 1

1/1

 Attention: Orientation 5 items (date, day of week, place)

5/5

3. Executive function

 Serial 7’s, 1007 test (93,86,79,72,65)

5/5

 Phonemic fluency words beginning with “F” in 1 min; if ≥12 score 1

1/1

4. Working memory

 Working memory: Digits 5 back, example: 85410…01458; if correct score 1

1/1

5. Episodic verbal memory

 Learn/register words: Ocean, orange, courage, building, rapid, recall at 5 min

5/5

Total score

/20

Appendix 3: Cobe 50: A Brief Mental Status Test, a Precision Tool for an Individual (n = 1). Score 1 for Each Correct Item

Cognitive domains

Attention

1. Orientation 5 items (date, day of week, place)

5/5

2. Serial 7’s, 1007 test (93,86,79,72,65)

5/5

Language, praxis, acquired cultural circuits

1. Fluency: If no hesitations, paraphasias, stuttering during discourse, score 1

1/1

2. Comprehension: Closes your eyes and makes a fist; if both correct score 1

1/1

3. Repetition “Today is a sunny and windy day”

1/1

4. Naming: 5 items: Cell phone, pen, ID card, computer keyboard, magazine

5/5

5. No dysarthria or hypophonia

1/1

6. Reading/writing: Reads and executes: What is your job? (has subject, verb, makes sense)

1/1

7. Praxis: Shows hand position when using a pair of scissors

1/1

Executive function

1. Phonemic fluency words beginning with “F” in 1 min; if ≥12 score 1

1/1

2. Semantic fluency, animal naming; if ≥16 score 1

1/1

3. Working memory: Digits 5 back, example: 85410…01458; if correct score 1

1/1

4. Luria motor series (fist, palm, hand sequence) do 5 cycles; if all correct score 1

1/1

5. Speed of information processing (short trails test): 1A-2B-3C-4D-5E; if all correct score 1

1/1

Visuospatial

1. Draws a clock with numbers at 10 past 11; if good copy, score 1

1/1

2. Draws a 3-dimensional (Necker) cube; if good copy, score 1

1/1

Memory

1. Verbal: Learns to register words: Ocean, orange, courage, building, rapid, recall at 5 min

5/5

2. Nonverbal: Learns to register by copying 5-point star, triangle, cross, recall at 5 min

3/3

3. Remote memory (any 2 personal notable events: school/college graduation, wedding)

2/2

Behavioral domains

Conation

1. Abulia: Poverty of speech, actions, slowed processing of instructions. No abulia scores 1

1/1

Disinhibition

1. Go-No-Go paradigm: Lifts index finger for 1 tap, does not lift for 2 taps; if 5 cycles correct

1/1

2. Disinhibition: Inappropriate joviality, remarks, actions toward others; if absent score 1

1/1

3. Prehension behavior – Maintains attention, pats side of examiner’s face, then claps hands without suggesting patient to follow suit; score 0 for no imitation, score 1 if enacts either imitation

1/1

Emotional regulation

1. Empathy disorders (intrapersonal emotional intelligence)

Emotional blunting, poor or inappropriate emotion detection; if absent score 1

1/1

4. Sociopathy (interpersonal emotional intelligence)

Prefers to avoid people, crowds, has become asocial or dysocial; if absent score 1

1/1

5. Emotional lability (involuntary emotional expression disorder (IEED))

Laughs or cries easily or out of context; if absent score 1

1/1

Independency (ADL)

 Basic: Toilet, feeding, bathing, dressing, continence, transfer; if all intact score 1

1/1

 Instrumental: Finances, shopping, medications, driving, meal prep; if all intact score 1

1/1

Cognitive reserve

 Educational level in years, school, college, if 12 or more score 1

1/1

 Languages spoken, if 2 or more score 1

1/1

Total

/50

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoffmann, M. (2020). Bedside Mental Status Evaluation: Overview, Coconuts, Cobe-50. In: Clinical Mentation Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46324-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics