Abstract
Epidemiology is a core science that informs the development of rational public health policy. The obligation of epidemiologists, as part of the community of health scientists, is to protect public health and safety from established, as well as suspected avoidable harms. This obligation is discussed in the context of ecological and related environmental damage. It underscores why ecological integrity is a concern for those in public health and, indeed, with the survival of our species.
Because health protection is central to public health’s mission, the four-level framework for the prevention of disease and premature death is considered; namely: Primordial, Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Prevention. The first two of these are more related to concerns for ecological integrity, tying nicely into preventing our species’ demise and possible extinction.
Being an applied, soft science, epidemiology provides the core scientific methods for health protection. Epidemiological evidence—coming from a soft science—can be influenced by interests that manipulate the scientific method to cast doubt, thus fomenting uncertainty designed to mislead both the public and policy-makers. Because of this, some ethical and practical dimensions of influence that result in delayed policy action are identified, to help us better control influences that derail science counter to the public interest.
Some examples highlight the challenges posed, making the solutions that follow more tractable. To protect the public interest and better ensure the sustainability of life on Earth, the need for vigilance by professionals with the capacity to speak truth to power is noted. Additionally emphasized is the need to train students to diagnose scientific misconduct and to devise and provide effective strategies for calling it to account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baur X, Budnik LT, Ruff K, Egilman DS, Lemen RA, Soskolne CL (2015) Ethics, morality, and conflicting interests: how questionable professional integrity in some scientists supports global corporate influence in public health. Int J Occup Environ Health 21:172–175
Baur X, Soskolne CL, Bero LA (2019) Commentary. How can the integrity of occupational and environmental health research be maintained in the presence of conflicting interests? Environ Health 18:93. Published on: 4 November 2019. https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-019-0527-x (accessed May 9, 2020)
Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellstrom T (2006) Basic epidemiology, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://books.google.ca/books/about/Basic_Epidemiology.html?id=AAZGobMNTXgC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed May 9, 2020)
Cranor CF (2011) Legally poisoned: how the law puts us at risk from toxicants. Harvard University Press, Boston
Hill AB (1965) The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 58:295–300
International Society for Environmental Epidemiology (2001, revised 2009) ISEE Procedure for Dealing with Beleaguered Colleagues and/or Potential Whistleblowers. https://www.iseepi.org/Public/Public/About_Us/ISEE_Committees/Ethics_and_Philosophy.aspx. (accessed May 9, 2020)
Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, Lemons J, Levins R, Loechler EL, Quinn M, Rudel R, Schettler T, Stoto M (2001) The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 109(9):871–876. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11673114 (accessed May 9, 2020)
Maclure M (1985) Popperian refutation in epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 121:343–350
Mergler D (2019) The legacy of mercury poisoning and racism: the case of a First Nation community in Canada. Abstract. Annual Ramazzini Days, 24–27 October; Carpi, Italy
Michaels D (2008) Doubt is their product: how industry’s assault on science threatens your health. Oxford University Press, New York
Michaels D (2020) The Triumph of Doubt: Dark Money and the Science of Deception. Oxford University Press, New York, USA
Miller A (2019) 20 years after the Libby Montana asbestos response: past, current, and future issues and implications. Abstract. Annual Ramazzini Days, 24–27 October; Carpi, Italy
Miller AB, Sears ME, Morgan LL, Davis DL, Hardell L, Oremus M, Soskolne CL (2019) Risks to health and well-being from radio-frequency radiation emitted by cell phones and other wireless devices. Front Public Health 7:223; 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223.; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223/full. Accessed 9 May 2020
Popper K (1963) Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge, London
Ruff K (2015) Commentary: scientific journals and conflict of interest disclosure: what progress has been made? Environ Health 14:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-015-0035-6. (accessed May 9, 2020)
Ruff K (2017) Serving industry, promoting skepticism, discrediting epidemiology, Chapter 7. In: Walker MJ (ed) Corporate ties that bind: an examination of corporate manipulation and vested interest in public health. Skyhorse Publishing, New York, pp 119–135; 482–485
Sasco AJ (2018) Has anything changed since the 2011 IARC classification of EMF? Abstract. Annual Ramazzini Days, 1–4 November; Carpi, Italy
Soskolne CL (2005) On the even greater need for precaution under global change (Reprinted from The European Journal of Oncology Library, Vol 2, 2003). Human Ecol Risk Assess 11:97–106
Soskolne CL (2015) Public health and environmental health risk assessment: which paradigm and in whose best interests? In: Westra L, Gray J, Karageorgou V (eds) Ecological systems integrity: governance, law and human rights. Earthscan, London, Chapter 16, pp 191–200
Soskolne CL (2017) Global, regional and local ecological change: ethical aspects of public health research and practice. Part 1, Chapter 1. In: Zölzer F, Meskens G (eds) Ethics of environmental health. Earthscan from Routledge, Oxon. [ISBN 978-1-138-18662-0 (hbk); 978-1-315-64372-4 (ebk)]; pp 3–16
Soskolne CL (2019) The role of vested interests and dominant narratives in science, risk management and risk communication. Chapter 8. In: Zölzer F, Meskens G (eds) Environmental health risks: ethical aspects, Routledge studies in environment and health. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. London and New York, pp 123–134
Soskolne C, Baur X (2019) How corporate influence continues to undermine the public’s health. Commentary. J Sci Pract Integr 1(1). file:///C:/Users/15142/Downloads/9747-how-corporate-influence-continues-toundermine-the-public-s-health%20(2).pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Soskolne, C.L. (2020). Epidemiology and Public Health Under Siege: In Whose Best Interests?. In: Westra, L., Bosselmann, K., Fermeglia, M. (eds) Ecological Integrity in Science and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46258-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46259-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)