Skip to main content

Agriculture in the European Union: Seven More Years of Environmental Austerity?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ecological Integrity in Science and Law
  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

At a time when scientific consensus suggests that urgent and ambitious action is needed to address the ecological impacts of production agriculture, not least for realising international climate and environmental objectives, the political will to address these challenges has become increasingly stifled by several converging factors. In the European context, years of economic austerity has been followed by dramatic events including the decision of the United Kingdom to leave the European Union in 2016, as well as the endorsement of nationalist and populist agendas across a growing number of Member States. Together, these and other shifts in the geopolitical winds have already had direct implications for the way that environmental objectives are prioritised and funded under the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy. And, as the European Union seeks to conclude the next round of policy reform (covering the programming period 2021–2027), the legislative proposals currently being negotiated suggest that ‘environmental austerity’ could continue well into the future. Against this background, this chapter considers the extent to which the Common Agricultural Policy may be expected to deliver the outcomes necessary to meaningfully address ecological decline and climate change in the European Union during the next seven-year programming cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dicks LV et al (2014) A transparent process for evidence-informed policy making. Conserv Lett 7(2):119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson M et al (2016) Chapter two – how agricultural intensification affects biodiversity and ecosystem services. Adv Ecol Res 55:43–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission (2018) Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources based on Member State reports for the period 2012–2015. COM(2018) 257

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 – and beyond – sustaining ecosystem services for human well-being. COM(2006) 216

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011a) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy. COM(2011) 625

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011b) Impact assessment

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2016) Mapping and analysis of the implementation of the CAP: 2016 implementation report. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017) The future of food and farming. COM(2017) 650

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2018) Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. COM/2018/392

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2019) Reflection paper: towards a sustainable Europe by 2030. COM(2019) 22

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council (2014) Conclusions on 2030 climate and energy policy framework. European Council

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Auditors (2017) Greening: a more complex income support scheme, not yet environmentally effective. European Court of Auditors Special Report: 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellmann T et al (2018) Major challenges of integrating agriculture into climate change mitigation policy frameworks. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 23(3):451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Getino AP et al (2017) Challenges and prospects in connectivity analysis in agricultural systems: actions to implement policies on land management and carbon storage at EU level. Land Use Policy 71:146–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart K (2015) Green direct payments: implementation choices of nine member states and their environmental implications. IEEP, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart K, Menadue H (2013) Equivalence mechanisms used for complying with greening requirements under the new common agricultural policy. IEEP, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck J et al (2014) Shades of greening: reviewing the impact of the new EU agricultural policy on ecosystem services. Change Adapt Socioecol Syst 1:51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Henke R et al (2017) The new common agricultural policy: how do member states respond to flexibility? J Common Market Stud 56(2):403–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2018) The regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2019) Climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack B (2016) Agriculture and EU law. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kovats RS et al (2014) Europe. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohbeck M et al (2016) The importance of biodiversity and dominance for multiple ecosystem functions in a human-modified tropical landscape. Ecology 97(10):2772–2779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louhichi K et al (2018) Economic impacts of the CAP greening: an application of an EU-wide farm model for CAP analysis. Eur Rev Agric Econ 45(2):205–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews A (2013) Greening CAP payments: a missed opportunity? IIEA, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews A (2016) The potential implications of a Brexit for future EU agri-food policies. EuroChoices 15(2):17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill DW et al (2018) A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nat Sustain 1:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pe’er G et al (2014) EU agricultural reform fails on biodiversity. Science 344(6188):1090–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinermann S et al (2019) The effect of droughts on vegetation condition in Germany: an analysis based on two decades of satellite earth observation time series and crop yield statistics. Remote Sens 11(15):1783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll A (2019) The new European Parliament: more eurosceptic? https://ukandeu.ac.uk/the-new-european-parliament-more-eurosceptic/. Accessed 15 Oct 2019

  • Rockström J et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springmann M (2018) Options for keeping the global food system within environmental limits. Nature 562:519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoate C et al (2009) Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe: a review. J Environ Manag 91(1):22–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toreti A (2019) The exceptional 2018 European water seesaw calls for action on adaptation. Earth’s Future 7:652–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett W et al (2019) Food in the anthropocene: the EAT–lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393(10170):447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia A. Epstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Epstein, A.A. (2020). Agriculture in the European Union: Seven More Years of Environmental Austerity?. In: Westra, L., Bosselmann, K., Fermeglia, M. (eds) Ecological Integrity in Science and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46258-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46259-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics