Abstract
The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis has been a successful methodology to integrate multiple stakeholders in the decision-making process. Because MAMCA evaluates different alternatives based on the objectives of the stakeholders, decision-makers can increase the support for the alternative they will choose. Still, the application of the methodology can be complex to popularize this approach. The MAMCA software was therefore published in order to facilitate the use of the methodology. The development of that tool offers also new opportunities. Currently, the goal is to extend the MAMCA software as a mass participation tool, hence maximizing participation involvement.
In order to facilitate the application of the methodology, the new MAMCA software was published. This contribution highlights how the MAMCA methodology was integrated into the software and how the data is being visualized. We focus on enhancing the concept of “Participation” in the development. A new data structure has been developed and an easier user interface makes the tool more accessible. An easy-understand evaluation method is integrated into the software. The interaction experience between participants is improved. Overall, the new MAMCA software is aimed to have a better performance in workshop settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
For more information, please visit: https://mamca.vub.be/.
References
Baudry, G., Macharis, C.: Decision-Making for Sustainable Transport and Mobility, Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (2018). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111805
Baudry, G., Macharis, C., Vallée, T.: A range based multi-actor multicriteria analysis to incorporate uncertainty in stakeholder based evaluation processes (2014)
Brans, J.P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: the promethee method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24(2), 228–238 (1986)
Crals, E., Keppens, M., Macharis, C., Ramboer, R., Vereeck, L., Vleugels, I.: Too many questions and too few options. Results of research into tradable mobility rights. Traffic Spec. 110, 15–18 (2004)
Doan, N.A.V., De Smet, Y.: An alternative weight sensitivity analysis for PROMETHEE II rankings. Omega 80, 166–174 (2018)
Edwards, W.: How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 7(5), 326–340 (1977)
Edwards, W., von Winterfeldt, D.: Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, vol. 604, pp. 6–8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Figueira, J.É., Greco, S., Ehrogott, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. ISORMS, vol. 78. Springer, New York (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/b100605
Fishburn, P.: Additive utilities with incomplete product set: applications to priorities and (1967)
Freeman, R.E.: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
Golden, B.L., Wasil, E.A., Harker, P.T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Applications and Studies. Springer, Heidelberg (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6
Hadavi, S., Macharis, C., Van Raemdonck, K.: The multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) tool: methodological adaptations and visualizations. In: Żak, J., Hadas, Y., Rossi, R. (eds.) EWGT/EURO-2016. AISC, vol. 572, pp. 39–53. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57105-8_2
Kumari, S., Rath, S.K.: Performance comparison of soap and rest based web services for enterprise application integration. In: 2015 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), pp. 1656–1660. IEEE (2015)
Li, Y., Manoharan, S.: A performance comparison of SQL and NOSQL databases. In: 2013 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PACRIM), pp. 15–19. IEEE (2013)
Lin, B., Chen, Y., Chen, X., Yu, Y.: Comparison between JSON and XML in applications based on AJAX. In: 2012 International Conference on Computer Science and Service System, pp. 1174–1177. IEEE (2012)
Macharis, C.: The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport (2005)
Macharis, C., De Witte, A., Ampe, J.: The multi-actor, multi-criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: theory and practice. J. Adv. Transp. 43(2), 183–202 (2009)
Macharis, C., Turcksin, L., Lebeau, K.: Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: state of use. Decis. Support Syst. 54(1), 610–620 (2012)
Macharis, C., Verbeke, A., De Brucker, K.: The strategic evaluation of new technologies through multicriteria analysis: the advisors case. Res. Transp. Econ. 8, 443–462 (2004)
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., Valipour, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications-a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1), 516–571 (2015)
Mesbah, A., Van Deursen, A.: Migrating multi-page web applications to single-page AJAX interfaces. In: 11th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2007), pp. 181–190. IEEE (2007)
Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., Voogd, H.: Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning, vol. 185. Elsevier (2013)
Patel, M.R., Vashi, M.P., Bhatt, B.V.: Smart-multi-criteria decision-making technique for use in planning activities. New Horisons in Civil Engineering (NHCE 2017), At Surat, Gujarat, India (2017)
Subramanian, V.: Pro MERN Stack: Full Stack Web App Development with Mongo. Express, React, and Node. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2653-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Huang, H., Lebeau, P., Macharis, C. (2020). The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA): New Software and New Visualizations. In: Moreno-Jiménez, J., Linden, I., Dargam, F., Jayawickrama, U. (eds) Decision Support Systems X: Cognitive Decision Support Systems and Technologies. ICDSST 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 384. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46224-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46224-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46223-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46224-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)