Abstract
This chapter of the book presents the ‘CO2-RFP Strategy’ as an innovative proposal for carbon dioxide use in the husbandry industry. Firstly, an introduction is provided to the important concepts the reader will need to learn to navigate a ‘minimal path’ through the strategy. Secondly, estimates of CO2 and NH3 emissions from husbandry (livestock) production are derived to help understand the implications and the guiding principles of the strategy. Finally, the strategy is theoretically explained and discussed as a business model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
M.J. Aguilar, Urine as a CO2 absorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 213–214, 502–504 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.087
H.A. Aguirre-Villegas, R.A. Larson, Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management practices using survey data and lifecycle tools. J. Clean. Prod. 143, 169–179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.133
C. Alonso-Moreno, S. García-Yuste, Environmental potential of the use of CO2 from alcoholic fermentation processes. The CO2-AFP strategy. Sci. Total Environ. 568, 319–326 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.220
C. Alonso-Moreno, J.J. Garde, J.E. Zafrilla et al., The Carbon Dioxide-rumen fermentation processes-strategy, a proposal to sustain environmentally friendly dairy farms. J. Clean. Prod. 204, 735–743 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.295
K. Armstrong, P. Styring, Assessing the potential of utilization and storage strategies for post-combustion CO2 emissions reduction. Front. Energy Res. 3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2015.00008
C. Baldini, F. Borgonovo, D. Gardoni, M. Guarino, Comparison among NH3 and GHGs emissive patterns from different housing solutions of dairy farms. Atmos. Environ. 141, 60–66 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.047
F. Barzagli, F. Mani, M. Peruzzini, Carbon dioxide uptake as ammonia and amine carbamates and their efficient conversion into urea and 1,3-disubstituted ureas. J. CO2 Util. 13, 81–89. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.12.006
J. Broucek, Production of methane emissions from ruminant husbandry: a review. J. Environ. Prot. (Irvine, Calif) 5, 1482–1493 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2014.515141
B.G. Choi, H.S. Park, G.H. Kim et al., Analysis of CO2-NH3 reaction dynamics in an aqueous phase by PCA and 2D IR cos. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 18, 98–104 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2011.11.087
J. Deng, C. Li, Y. Wang, Modeling ammonia emissions from dairy production systems in the United States. Atmos. Environ. 114, 8–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.018
FAO, Statistics: Dairy cows. (2012)
Fielder, Urine volume and specific gravity—special subjects—merck veterinary manual. (2017). https://www.merckvetmanual.com/special-subjects/reference-guides/urine-volume-and-specific-gravity. Accessed 25 Nov 2019
A.N. Hristov, M. Hanigan, A. Cole et al., Review: Ammonia emissions from dairy farms and beef feedlots. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 91, 1–35 (2011)
H.T. Hsueh, C.L. Hsiao, H. Chu, Removal of CO2 from flue gas with ammonia solution in a packed tower. Sustain. Environ. Res. 20, 1–7 (2010)
IEA, CO2 emissions. (2017). https://www.iea.org/statistics/co2emissions/. Accessed 25 Nov 2019
IPCC, Climate change 2007 Synthesis report. Intergov. Panel Clim. Chang. (Core Writ Team IPCC 104). (2007). https://doi.org/10.1256/004316502320517344
V.A. Ishler, Carbon, Methane emissions and the dairy cow. (2016). https://extension.psu.edu/carbon-methane-emissions-and-the-dairy-cow. Accessed 25 Nov 2019
H.S. Joo, P.M. Ndegwa, A.J. Heber et al., Greenhouse gas emissions from naturally ventilated freestall dairy barns. Atmos. Environ. 102, 384–392 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.067
A.W. Kleij, M. North, A. Urakawa, CO2 catalysis. Chemsuschem 10, 1036–1038 (2017)
J.R. Knapp, G.L. Laur, P.A. Vadas et al., Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. J. Dairy Sci. 97, 3231–3261 (2014)
J.W. Lee, R. Li, Integration of fossil energy systems with CO2 sequestration through NH4HCO3 production. Energy Convers. Manag. 44, 1535–1546 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00149-8
S. Lenka, N.K. Lenka, V. Sejian, M. Mohanty, Contribution of agriculture sector to climate change. Climate Change Impact on Livestock Adapt. Mitig. 37–48 (2015)
A.B. Leytem, R.S. Dungan, Livestock GRACEnet: A workgroup dedicated to evaluating and mitigating emissions from livestock production. J. Environ. Qual. 43, 1101 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.06.0264
X. Li, E. Hagaman, C. Tsouris, J.W. Lee, Removal of carbon dioxide from flue gas by ammonia carbonation in the gas phase. Energy Fuels 17, 69–74 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020120n
J. Liu, S. Wang, B. Zhao et al., Absorption of carbon dioxide in aqueous ammonia. Energy Procedia 933–940 (2009)
L. Loyon, C.H. Burton, T. Misselbrook et al., Best available technology for European livestock farms: Availability, effectiveness and uptake. J. Environ. Manage. 166, 1–11 (2016)
F. Mani, M. Peruzzini, P. Stoppioni, CO2 absorption by aqueous NH3 solutions: speciation of ammonium carbamate, bicarbonate and carbonate by a 13C NMR study. Green Chem. 8, 995 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1039/b602051h
L.B. Mendes, N. Edouard, N.W.M. Ogink et al., Spatial variability of mixing ratios of ammonia and tracer gases in a naturally ventilated dairy cow barn. Biosyst. Eng. 129, 360–369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.11.011
L.B. Mendes, J.G. Pieters, D. Snoek et al., Reduction of ammonia emissions from dairy cattle cubicle houses via improved management- or design-based strategies: A modeling approach. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 520–531 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.079
NASA, The carbon cycle. (2017). https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/CarbonCycle. Accessed 25 Nov 2019
T.D. Nennich, J.H. Harrison, L.M. VanWieringen et al., Prediction of manure and nutrient excretion from dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 88, 3721–3733 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73058-7
I. Omae, Recent developments in carbon dioxide utilization for the production of organic chemicals. Coord. Chem. Rev. 256, 1384–1405 (2012)
OMAFRA, Dairy housing—ventilation options for free stall barns. (2016). http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/15-017.htm. Accessed 25 Nov 2019
OSHA, OSHA occupational chemical database | occupational safety and health administration. (2017). https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/. Accessed 25 Nov 2019
H.S. Park, Y.M. Jung, J.K. You et al., Analysis of the CO2 and NH3 reaction in an aqueous solution by 2D IR COS: Formation of bicarbonate and carbamate. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 6558–6562 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp800991d
S. Reis, C. Howard, M.A. Sutton (eds.), Costs of Ammonia Abatement and the Climate Co-Benefits (Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2015)
V. Sejian, L. Samal, M. Bagath et al., Manure management: gaseous emissions, 3rd Edn, in Encyclopedia of Soil Science. (2016). pp. 1400–1405
B.P. Spigarelli, S.K. Kawatra, Opportunities and challenges in carbon dioxide capture. J. CO2 Util. 1, 69–87 (2013)
M.A. Sutton, O. Oenema, J.W. Erisman et al., Too much of a good thing. Nature 472, 159–161 (2011)
United Nations, The Paris agreement | UNFCCC. (2015). https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement. Accessed 26 Nov 2019
USDA, USDA agricultural air quality task force | NRCS. (2014). https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/air/taskforce/. Accessed 26 Nov 2019
USEPA, United States environmental protection agency | US EPA. (2017). https://www.epa.gov/. Accessed 26 Nov 2019
YARA, Yara International. (2017). https://www.yara.com/. Accessed 26 Nov 2019
H. Yu, P.H.M. Feron, Aqueous ammonia-based post-combustion CO2 capture, in Absorption-Based Post-Combustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide. (2016). pp. 283–301
B. Zhao, Y. Su, W. Tao et al., Post-combustion CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia: A state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 9, 355–371 (2012)
W. Zhou, B. Zhu, Q. Li et al., CO2 emissions and mitigation potential in China’s ammonia industry. Energy Policy 38, 3701–3709 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.048
Q. Zhuang, R. Pomalis, L. Zheng, B. Clements, Ammonia-based carbon dioxide capture technology: Issues and solutions. Energy Procedia 1459–1470 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alonso-Moreno, C., García-Yuste, S. (2020). The ‘CO2-RFP Strategy’. In: Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Dairy Farms. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46060-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46060-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46059-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46060-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)