Abstract
Souchon emphasises that the basic features of Clausewitz’s theory are of pre-eminent importance for strategists. He focuses on what are the known and most frequently quoted characteristics and pith of On War from the strategy point of view: The Fascinating Trinity, the Appropriateness of Means, the relation between Purpose, Objective and Means, the Frictions, Probabilities and Chance as well as the true Moral Quality of the Commander and the Virtues of the Army. The Fascinating Trinity is designed to achieve an abstract relationship between the philosophical, generic and real essence of war. It is the synthesis or capstone of Clausewitz’s entire intellectual work on the theory of war and the result of a dichotomous process that combines theory (essence) and action (manifestation) of abstract and real war. Souchon argues that with the inclusion of the important moral aspects Clausewitz sets high standards for the character and quality of commanders that still hold in today’s world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The translation by Howard/Paret On War uses the words paradoxical trinity for the translation of Wunderliche Dreifaltigkeit. Other translations are paradoxical, miraculous, wondrous or wonderful trinity. The translation fascinating trinity is best suited to reflect the analytical ideas of Clausewitz as well as its philosophical dimension.
Bibliography
Clausewitz’s Works
von Clausewitz, C. (1805). Bemerkungen über die reine und angewandte Strategie des Herrn von Bülow, oder Kritik der darin enthaltenen Ansichten. In H. P. R. von Porbeck (Ed.), Neue Bellona, Neunter Band, drittes Stück. Leipzig: Hinrichs.
Works on Clausewitz
Aron, R. (1980a). Clausewitz: Den Krieg denken. Frankfurt a.M.: Propyläen-Verlag.
Bassford, C. (2007). The primacy of the ‘Trinity’ in Clausewitz’s mature thought. In H. Strachan & A. Herberg-Rothe (Eds.), Clausewitz in the twenty-first century (pp. 74–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boston Consulting (Eds.). (2003). Clausewitz-Strategie denken. Munich.
Echevarria, A. J., II. (2007). Clausewitz and contemporary war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Echevarria, A. J., II. (2007a). Clausewitz and the Nature of the War on Terror. In H. Strachan & A. Herberg-Rothe (Eds.), Clausewitz in the twenty-first century (pp. 196–218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herberg-Rothe, A. (2000). Clausewitz und Hegel. Ein heuristischer Vergleich. Forschungen zur brandenburgischen und preußischen Geschichte, 10(1), 49–84.
Heusinger, A. (1987). Ein deutscher Soldat im 20. Jahrhundert. Schriftenreihe Innere Führung. Bonn: Bundesministerium der Verteidigung.
Herberg-Rothe, A. (2007). Clausewitz’s puzzle. The political theory of war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kleemeier, U. (2002). Grundfragen einer philosophischen Theorie des Krieges. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Paret, P. (1980b). Die politischen Ansichten von Clausewitz. In Clausewitz-Gesellschaft (Ed.), Freiheit ohne Krieg (pp. 333–348). Bonn: Dümmler.
Schössler, D. (2009). Clausewitz-Engels-Mahan: Grundriss einer Ideengeschichte militärischen Denkens. Berlin: Dümmler.
Smith, H. (2004). On Clausewitz – A study of military and political ideas. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Strachan, H. (2007a). A Clausewitz for every season. The American Interest, 29–35. July/August 2007.
Strickmann, E. (2008). Clausewitz im Zeitalter der neuen Kriege: Der Krieg in Ruanda (1990–1994) im Spiegel der “wunderlichen Dreifaltigkeit”. Berlin: Galda.
Tuchmann, B. (1978). A Distant Mirror - The Calamitous 14th Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
van Creveld, M. (1991). The transformation of war. New York: The Free Press.
von Reichert, R. (1987). Clausewitz' “Moralischen Größen” und die Wehrbereitschaft im späten 20. Jahrhundert [Lecture manuscript]. Hamburg: Bundeswehr Command and Staff College.
Further Literature
Beutler, Ernst (Ed.) (1948–1954). Gedenkausgabe der Werke, Briefe und Gespräche Johann Wolfgang von Goethe 24 vols. Zürich: Artemis Verlag
Bloch, A. (1981). Murphy’s law (Vol. 2). London: Arrow Books.
Clement, Rolf (2006). Der Beirat der Inneren Führung und seine Bedeutung für die Streitkräfte. In Mittler-Brief, 3rd quarter 2006. Bonn.
Goethe’s Werke. (1873). Vols. 1–30. Introduction by Gustav Wendt et al. Berlin.
Hegel, G. F. W. (1973/4). Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, 1818–1831. (6 vols.) Commented by Karl-Heinz Ilting (Ed.). Stuttgart.
Kant, Immanuel (1911). Selections from Kant’s critique of aesthetic judgement. Translated by J. C. Meredith. Retrieved June 29 2019, from http://www.mnstate.edu
Opitz, E. (Ed.). (1998). Gerhard Scharnhorst: vom Wesen und Wirken der preußischen Heeresreform. Ein Tagungsband. Bremen: Edition Temmen.
von Bredow, W. (2000). Demokratie und Streitkräfte: Militär, Staat und Gesellschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
von Goethe, J. W. (1837). Goethe’s poetische und prosaische Werke in Zwei Bänden (Vol. 2). Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Souchon, L. (2020). On War: Basic Features. In: Strategy in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46028-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46028-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46027-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46028-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)