Abstract
Recent functional studies have shed light into how the combinatorics of genes associated with quorum sensing (QS) – often described as an entity-entity communication mechanism – may support different communication modalities in bacteriophages. Specifically, only systems of QS genes for phage to phage communication and eavesdropping on bacterial communication molecules have been characterized so far, which represents only a fraction of the spectrum of all the possible communication modalities predicted by this combinatory logic. However, we argue that computational methods are already available to systematically mine the genomes of viruses and other microorganisms for QS genes, to compare these genes together across genomes, and to infer many novel links and types of communication between microbiological entities. All these putative communication links could be conveniently represented together in the form of a network, which would summarize which virus is suspected to interact with which microbiological entity, via which QS signaling molecule and foremost, under which communication modality. Besides, with the recent advents of metagenomics and metaviromics that enable accessing to genomes sequenced from the same environmental site, it would be theoretically possible to use this methodology to partially infer the big picture of communication inside a real community of viruses and cellular organisms. Finally, we discuss how the systematic analysis of such predicted microbial communication networks could provide insights into the many forms and “social” consequences that the biocommunication of viruses may imply.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abedon ST (2015) Bacteriophage secondary infection. Virol Sin 30(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-014-3547-2
Albertsen M, Hugenholtz P, Skarshewski A, Nielsen KL, Tyson GW, Nielsen PH (2013) Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat Biotechnol 31(6):533–538. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2579
Bhatt VS (2018) Quorum sensing mechanisms in gram positive bacteria, in implication of quorum sensing system in biofilm formation and virulence. Singapore, Springer Singapore, pp 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2429-1_20
Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp 2008(10):P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J Math Sociol 2(1):113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
Bouttier J, Di Francesco P, Guitter E (2003) Geodesic distance in planar graphs. Nucl Phys B 663(3):535–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00355-9
Breitwieser FP, Lu J, Salzberg SL (2019) A review of methods and databases for metagenomic classification and assembly. Brief Bioinform 20(4):1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx120
Corel E, Méheust R, Watson AK, McInerney JO, Lopez P, Bapteste E (2018) Bipartite network analysis of gene sharings in the microbial world. Mol Biol Evol 35(4):899–913. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy001
Cornforth DM, Popat R, McNally L, Gurney J, Scott-Phillips TC, Ivens A, Diggle SP, Brown SP (2014) Combinatorial quorum sensing allows bacteria to resolve their social and physical environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(11):4280–4284. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319175111
Erez Z, Steinberger-Levy I, Shamir M, Doron S, Stokar-Avihail A, Peleg Y, Melamed S et al (2017) Communication between viruses guides lysis-lysogeny decisions. Nature 541(7638):488–493. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21049
Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1(3):215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP (1994) Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol 176(2):269–275. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.2.269-275.1994
González JF, Venturi V (2013) A novel widespread interkingdom signaling circuit. Trends Plant Sci 18(3):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.09.007
Hargreaves KR, Kropinski AM, Clokie MRJ (2014) “What does the talking?: quorum sensing signalling genes discovered in a bacteriophage genome.” edited by Gunnar F. Kaufmann. PLoS One 9(1):e85131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085131
Hochstrasser R, Hilbi H (2017) Intra-species and inter-kingdom signaling of Legionella Pneumophila. Front Microbiol 8:79. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2017.00079
Johnson MR, Montero CI, Conners SB, Shockley KR, Bridger SL, Kelly RM (2005) Population density-dependent regulation of exopolysaccharide formation in the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga Maritima. Mol Microbiol 55(3):664–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04419.x
Jung SA, Chapman CA, Ng W-L (2015) Quadruple quorum-sensing inputs control vibrio cholerae virulence and maintain system robustness. PLoS Pathog 11(4):e1004837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004837
Karavolos MH, Winzer K, Williams P, Anjam Khan CM (2013) Pathogen espionage: multiple bacterial adrenergic sensors eavesdrop on host communication systems. Mol Microbiol 87(3):455–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12110
Lee W, Lee S-H, Kim M, Moon J-S, Kim G-W, Jung H-G, Kim IH et al (2018) Vibrio Vulnificus quorum-sensing molecule cyclo(Phe-Pro) inhibits RIG-I-mediated antiviral innate immunity. Nat Commun 9(1):1606. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04075-1
Luo C, Knight R, Siljander H, Knip M, Xavier RJ, Gevers D (2015) ConStrains identifies microbial strains in metagenomic datasets. Nat Biotechnol 33(10):1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3319
Mehmood A, Liu G, Wang X, Meng G, Wang C, Liu Y (2019) Fungal quorum-sensing molecules and inhibitors with potential antifungal activity: a review. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 24(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24101950
Mehta P, Goyal S, Long T, Bassler BL, Wingreen NS (2009) Information processing and signal integration in bacterial quorum sensing. Mol Syst Biol 5(1):325. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2009.79
Miller MB, Bassler BL (2001) Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 55(1):165–199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.165
Mukherjee S, Bassler BL (2019) Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat Rev Microbiol 17(6):371–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0186-5
Nealson KH, Platt T, Hastings JW (1970) Cellular control of the synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system. J Bacteriol 104(1):313–322
Newman MEJ (2005) A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc Networks 27(1):39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCNET.2004.11.009
Oliver KM, Degnan PH, Hunter MS, Moran NA (2009) Bacteriophages encode factors required for protection in a symbiotic mutualism. Science (New York, NY) 325(5943):992–994. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174463
Oppenheim AB, Kobiler O, Stavans J, Court DL, Adhya S (2005) Switches in bacteriophage lambda development. Annu Rev Genet 39(1):409–429. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.113656
Paggi RA, Martone CB, Fuqua C, Castro RE (2003) Detection of quorum sensing signals in the haloalkaliphilic archaeon Natronococcus Occultus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 221(1):49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00174-5
Papenfort K, Bassler BL (2016) Quorum sensing signal-response systems in gram-negative bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 14(9):576–588. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89
Probst AJ, Ladd B, Jarett JK, Geller-McGrath DE, Sieber CMK, Emerson JB, Anantharaman K et al (2018) Differential depth distribution of microbial function and putative symbionts through sediment-hosted aquifers in the deep terrestrial subsurface. Nat Microbiol 3(3):328–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-017-0098-y
Rajput A, Kaur K, Kumar M (2016) SigMol: repertoire of quorum sensing signaling molecules in prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1):D634–D639. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1076
Schuch R, Fischetti VA (2009) The secret life of the anthrax agent Bacillus Anthracis: bacteriophage-mediated ecological adaptations. PLoS One 4(8):e6532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006532
Shaw ME (1954) Group structure and the behavior of individuals in small groups. J Psychol 38(1):139–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1954.9712925
Silpe JE, Bassler BL (2019a) A host-produced quorum-sensing autoinducer controls a phage lysis-lysogeny decision. Cell 176(1–2):268–280.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2018.10.059
Silpe JE, Bassler BL (2019b) Phage-encoded LuxR-type receptors responsive to host-produced bacterial quorum-sensing autoinducers. BioRxiv March:577726. https://doi.org/10.1101/577726
Stokar-Avihail A, Tal N, Erez Z, Lopatina A, Sorek R (2019) Widespread utilization of peptide communication in phages infecting soil and pathogenic bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 25(5):746–755.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.017
Sun J, Daniel R, Wagner-Döbler I, Zeng A-P (2004) Is autoinducer-2 a universal signal for interspecies communication: a comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis of the synthesis and signal transduction pathways. BMC Evol Biol 4(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-4-36
Sztajer H, Szafranski SP, Tomasch J, Reck M, Nimtz M, Rohde M, Wagner-Döbler I (2014) Cross-feeding and interkingdom communication in dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus Mutans and Candida Albicans. ISME J 8(11):2256–2271. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.73
Wahl LM, Betti MI, Dick DW, Pattenden T, Puccini AJ (2018) Evolutionary stability of the lysis-lysogeny decision: why be virulent? Evolution 73(1):evo.13648. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13648
Waters CM, Bassler BL (2005) QUORUM SENSING: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21(1):319–346. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001
Watve S, Barrasso K, Jung SA, Davis KJ, Hawver LA, Khataokar A, Palaganas RG, Neiditch MB, Perez LJ, Ng W-L (2019) Ethanolamine regulates CqsR quorum-sensing signaling in vibrio cholerae. BioRxiv March:589390. https://doi.org/10.1101/589390
Yang P, Yu S, Lin C, Ning K (2019) Meta-network: optimized species-species network analysis for microbial communities. BMC Genomics 20(S2):187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5471-1
Zhang G, Zhang F, Ding G, Li J, Guo X, Zhu J, Zhou L et al (2012) Acyl homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing in a methanogenic archaeon. ISME J 6(7):1336–1344. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.203
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bernard, C., Lopez, P., Bapteste, E. (2020). Microbial Communication Networks: Sketching a Method for Analyzing the Communication of Bacteriophages Inside Environmental Communities. In: Witzany, G. (eds) Biocommunication of Phages. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45885-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45885-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45884-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45885-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)