Advertisement

Hannah Arendt pp 185-209 | Cite as

Arendt in Anticipation

  • Rebecca DewEmail author
Chapter
  • 44 Downloads
Part of the International Political Theory book series (IPoT)

Abstract

My final chapter details Arendt’s adaptation of postmodern preference. Arendt accounts for the plurality of human action but does not claim to completely abandon grand narratives. She rebels against the modern fetish for totality—including its most visceral manifestation, German pan-nationalism—and seeks to substantiate plurality on the grounds of inter esse. Arendt is postmodern in her criticism of the inclination to empathy in a privatized and socialized politics. However, she is decidedly anti-postmodernist in her understanding and advocacy of political action as a morally informed proposition. Thus, to the degree Arendt is to be considered postmodern, her critique of modernity is primarily affiliated with postmodernism in the movement’s emphasis on forming connections in order to grasp shared meaning and access shared space.

Keywords

Hannah Arendt Ideology Modernism Postmodernism Postmodernity 

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1953. Understanding and Politics. Partisan Review 20: 377–92.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah. 1956. Authority in the Twentieth Century. The Review of Politics 18: 403–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendt, Hannah. 1960. Society and Culture. Daedalus 89: 278–87.Google Scholar
  4. Arendt, Hannah. 1967. The Origins of Totalitarianism. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  5. Arendt, Hannah. 1968a. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  6. Arendt, Hannah. 1968b. Men in Dark Times, ed. J. Kohn. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  7. Arendt, Hannah. 1972. Crises of the Republic: Lying in Politics, Civil Disobedience on Violence, Thoughts on Politics, and Revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  8. Arendt, Hannah. 1973. On Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Arendt, Hannah. 1978a. Martin Heidegger at Eighty. In Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays, ed. M. Murray. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Arendt, Hannah. 1978b. The Life of the Mind: Thinking. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  11. Arendt, Hannah. 1978c. The Life of the Mind: Willing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  12. Arendt, Hannah. 1982. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. R. Beiner. Chicago: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  13. Arendt, Hannah. 1996. Love and Saint Augustine, ed. J. Scott and J. Stark. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Arendt, Hannah. 2005. Religion and the Intellectuals. In Essays in Understanding: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism, 1930–1954, ed. J. Kohn, 228–31. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  15. Arendt, Hannah. 2007. The Great Tradition: 1. Law and Power. Social Research 74: 713–26.Google Scholar
  16. Arendt, Hannah. 1954. Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism, ed. J. Kohn. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Arendt, Hannah, and Jerome Kohn. 2005. The Promise of Politics. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  18. Barnouw, Dagmar. 1988. Weimar Intellectuals and the Threat of Modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Benhabib, Seyla. 1990. Hannah Arendt and the Redemptive Power of Narrative. Social Research 57: 167–96.Google Scholar
  20. Benjamin, Walter. 1973. Illuminations, ed. H. Arendt. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  21. Bernstein, Richard. 1997. Provocation and Appropriation: Hannah Arendt’s Response to Martin Heidegger. Constellations 4: 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Buber, Martin. 1985. Between Man and Man. New York: Collier Books/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Callinicos, Alex. 1989. Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Camus, Albert. [1942] 1955. The Myth of Sisyphus, trans. J.O’Brien. London: H. Hamilton.Google Scholar
  25. Camus, Albert. 1962. The Rebel, trans. A. Bower. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  26. Canovan, Margaret. 1992. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Connor, Steven. 1989. Postmodernist Culture: An Introduction to Theories of the Contemporary. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Court, Anthony. 2009. Hannah Arendt’s Response to the Crisis of Her Times. Amsterdam; Pretoria: Rozenberg.Google Scholar
  29. Deutscher, Max. 2007. Judgment After Arendt. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. Dew, Rebecca. 2016. German(e) Encounters with Global Crisis: Deconstructing Society and Reconstructing Spirituality. Metodo 4: 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dew, Rebecca. 2018. Martin Buber and Hannah Arendt: Criticisms on the Development of a German Messianic. History of European Ideas 44: 623–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dew, Rebecca. 2019. Beyond Secular Borders: Habermas’s Communicative Ethic and the Need for Post-Secular Understanding. Critical Horizons 20: 317–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ettinger, Elżbieta. 2004. Hannah Arendt/Martin Heidegger, Letters, 1925–1975. Orlando: Harcourt [Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger. 1998. Briefe 1925 bis 1975 und andere Zeugnisse. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann].Google Scholar
  34. Fox, Nik F. 2003. The New Sartre: Explorations in Postmodernism. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  35. Grumett, David. 2000. Arendt, Augustine and Evil. Heythrop Journal 41: 154–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. “Hannah Arendt im Gespräch mit Günter Gaus,” 1964 Interview. Accessed August 31, 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9SyTEUi6Kw.
  39. Heidegger, Martin. 1961. Nietzsche. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar
  40. Heidegger, Martin. 1991. Nietzsche, vols. 1 and 2, ed. D.F. Krell. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  41. Heller, Agnes. 1982. The Power of Shame. Dialectical Anthropology 6: 215–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heller, Agnes, and Ferenc Fehér. 1988. The Postmodern Political Condition. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Isaac, Jeffrey. 1992. Arendt, Camus, and Modern Rebellion. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jaspers, Karl. 1961. The Future of Mankind, trans. E.B. Ashton. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Jaspers, Karl. 1967. Philosophical Faith and Revelation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  46. Kant, Immanuel. 1950. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kant, Immanuel. 1963. Critique of Pure Reason. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Toward Perpetual Peace. In Practical Philosophy, trans. M. Gregor. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Levin, David M. 1988. The Opening of Vision: Nihilism and the Postmodern Situation. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Löwith, Karl. 1995. Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism, trans. G. Steiner, ed. R. Wolin. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lundin, Roger. 1993. The Culture of Interpretation: Christian Faith and the Postmodern World. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  52. McGrath, J.S. 2011. The Early Heidegger and Medieval Philosophy: Phenomenology for the Godforsaken. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nietzsche, Friedrich W., Walter Kaufmann, and R.J. Hollingdale. 1967. The Will to Power. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  54. Oden, Thomas C. 1992. Two Worlds: Notes on the Death of Modernity in America and Russia. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rockmore, Tom. 2003. Jaspers, Weltanschauung, and the Idea of Philosophy. In Karl Jaspers: On Philosophy of History and History of Philosophy, ed. J.W. Koterski Sr. and R.J. Langley. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  56. Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Simmons, Aaron. 2006. Finding Uses for Used-Up Words: Thinking Weltanschauung ‘After’ Heidegger. Philosophy Today 50: 156–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Simpson, John A., and E.S.C. Weiner. 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  59. Toynbee, Arnold Joseph. 1948. A Study of History. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Toynbee, Arnold Joseph. 1956. An Historian’s Approach to Religion: Based on Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of Edinburgh in the Years 1952 and 1953. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Veith, Gene Edward, Jr. 1994. Postmodern Times: A Christian Guide to Contemporary Thought and Culture. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.Google Scholar
  62. Villa, Dana. 1996. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Villa, Dana. 2007. Arendt, Heidegger, and the Tradition. Social Research 74: 983–1002.Google Scholar
  64. Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth. 1982. Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida LegislatureUSA

Personalised recommendations