Skip to main content

The Outsourcing of IT Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Outsourcing

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

For the last 50 years, IT researchers have investigated IT governance; the apparatus of structure, processes, and relational capabilities needed to ensure expected benefits are generated from IT resources. This include looking at the structure of IT departments, the use of outsourcing, the role of overseers, etc. Notwithstanding accumulated knowledge, IT governance as an object of study is changing and this is challenging our understanding of governance. Recent changes in the environment have created a context where an increasingly large part of the decisions related to IT governance are now made by instances outside the firm. These changes include outsourcing, offshoring, growth of platforms, IT services evolution, as well as new regulations and standards. We argue that focusing on governance structures may lead to being concerned with only a small portion of the IT resources used by an organization. In contrast, a focus on governance processes is likely to offer a broader reach for governance purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.isaca.org/cobit/pages/default.aspx.

  2. 2.

    For example: https://www.sap.com/canada/about/customer-involvement/user-groups.html.

  3. 3.

    See for example: Hughes, C. (2019).

References

  • Ahituv, N., Neumann, S., & Zviran, M. (1989). Factors affecting the policy for distributing computing resources. MIS Quarterly, 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S., & Green, P. (2012). Effective information technology (IT) governance mechanisms: An IT outsourcing perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, B. A., Rivard, S., & Patry, M. (1996). A transaction cost approach to outsourcing behavior: Some empirical evidence. Information & Management, 30(2), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, B. A., Houde, J. F., Patry, M., & Rivard, S. (2012). A multi-level investigation of information technology outsourcing. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(3), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, B. A., Houde, J. F., Rivard, S., & Patry, M. (2017). Determinants of contract completeness for information technology outsourcing. Information Technology and Management, 18(4), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Bogner, W. C. (2002). Deciding on ISO 14001: economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning, 35(3), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barki, H., Rivard, S., & Talbot, J. (2001). An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of management information systems, 17(4), 37–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, C. (2015). New technology, personal data protection and implications’ for financial services regulation’. JASSA, 4, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bömer, M., & Maxin, H. (2018). Why fintechs cooperate with banks—evidence from germany. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 107(4), 359–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. E., & Grant, G. G. (2005). Framing the frameworks: A review of IT governance research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 237–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, M. (1998). Data processing and technological change: The post office savings bank, 1861–1930. Technology and Culture, 39(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018). Introduction—platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, A., & Pearson, S. (2013). Developing accountability-based solutions for data privacy in the cloud. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research26(1–2), 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleven, A., & Winter, R. (2009). Regulatory compliance in information systems research–literature analysis and research agenda. In Enterprise, business-process and information systems modeling (pp. 174–186). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dapp, T., Slomka, L., AG, D. B., & Hoffmann, R. (2015). Fintech reloaded–Traditional banks as digital ecosystems. Deutsche Bank Research, 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., & Debreceny, R. S. (2013). COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities. Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denning, S. (2013). Boeing’s offshoring woes: seven lessons every CEO must learn. Strategy & Leadership, 41(3), 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury, D. H. (1980). A survey of data processing chargeback practices. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research18(4), 342–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, D. H. (1984). An evaluation of data processing steering committees. MIS Quarterly, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ein-Dor, P., & Segev, E. (1978). Centralization, decentralization and management information systems. Information & Management, 1(3), 169–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ein-Dor, P., & Segev, E. (1982). Organizational context and MIS structure: Some empirical evidence. MIS quarterly, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garba, A. B., Armarego, J., Murray, D., & Kenworthy, W. (2015). Review of the information security and privacy challenges in Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) environments. Journal of Information privacy and security, 11(1), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gewald, H., & Schäfer, L. (2017). Quo vadis outsourcing? A view from practice. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 10(1), 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goo, J. (2010). Structure of service level agreements (SLA) in IT outsourcing: The construct and its measurement. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(2), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goo, J., Kishore, R., Rao, H. R., & Nam, K. (2009). The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 119–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gozman, D., & Willcocks, L. (2015). Crocodiles in the regulatory swamp: navigating the dangers of outsourcing, SaaS and shadow IT. In International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, USA (20 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. W., Kaganer, E., Henfridsson, O., & Ruch, T. J. (2018). IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1225–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1999). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal38(2.3), 472–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufnagel, E. M., & Birnberg, J. G. (1989). Perceived chargeback system fairness in decentralized organizations: An examination of the issues. MIS Quarterly, 415–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. (2019). Is it time to break up Facebook, New York Times, May 9th. Accessed May 11, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/opinion/sunday/chris-hughes-facebook-zuckerberg.html?.

  • Hung, J. L., & Luo, B. (2016). FinTech in Taiwan: a case study of a Bank’s strategic planning for an investment in a FinTech company. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandhyala, S. (2013). Property rights and international investment in information technology services. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 877–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A., Huygh, T., & De Haes, S. (2017). Examining the association between industry IT strategic role and IT governance implementation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S., & Lacity, M. (2012). Survey results: are client organizations responding to anti-offshoring pressures? Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 5(2), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, H., Zhang, S., Giddens, L., Milic, N., Yan, K., & Curry, P. (2014). Consumerization and IT department conflict. In International Conference on Information Systems, Auckland, New Zealand (15 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. C., & Hirschheim, R. A. (1993). Information systems outsourcing; myths, metaphors, and realities. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. C., Khan, S. A., & Willcocks, L. P. (2009). A review of the IT outsourcing literature: Insights for practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(3), 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 49(1), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N., & Robertson, P. L. (1992). Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research Policy, 21(4), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. (2009). Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 901–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Tan, C. H., Teo, H. H., & Tan, B. C. (2006). Innovative usage of information technology in Singapore organizations: Do CIO characteristics make a difference? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(2), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Determinants of information technology outsourcing: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthy, D., & Forcht, K. (2006). Laws and regulations affecting information management and frameworks for assessing compliance. Information Management & Computer Security, 14(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (2017). Datification, organizational strategy, and is research: What’s the score?. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(3), 233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeen, J. D., & Guimaraes, T. (1985). Selecting MIS projects by steering committee. Communications of the ACM, 28(12), 1344–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muffatto, M. (1999). Introducing a platform strategy in product development. International Journal of Production Economics, 60, 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassimbeni, G., Sartor, M., & Dus, D. (2012). Security risks in service offshoring and outsourcing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(3), 405–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. P., & Shih, W. C. (2012). Does America really need manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 90(3), 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puschmann, T. (2017). Fintech. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(1), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (1996). Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivard, S., & Huff, S. L. (1988). Factors of success for end-user computing. Communications of the ACM, 31(5), 552–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockart, J. F., & Flannery, L. S. (1983). The management of end user computing. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 776–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. W., & Beath, C. M. (2006). Sustainable IT outsourcing success: Let enterprise architecture be your guide. MIS Quarterly Executive5(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Segev, A., & Gebauer, J. (2001). B2B procurement and marketplace transformation. Information Technology and Management, 2(3), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, P. J., Procher, V. D., & Urbig, D. (2017). Too much or too little of R&D offshoring: The impact of captive offshoring and contract offshoring on innovation performance. Research Policy, 46(10), 1810–1823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, W., & Ditmar, L. (2006). The unexpected benefits of Sarbanes-Oxley. Harvard Business Review, April, 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka, J. W. (2000). A shift in the mortgage landscape: The 1990s move to automated credit evaluations. Journal of Housing Research, 11(2), 207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakker, D., Schireson, M., Nguyen-Huu, D., (2017, April 7). Tracking the explosive growth of open-source software, Techcrunch.com. Retrieved April 15, 2019 from https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/07/tracking-the-explosive-growth-of-open-source-software/.

  • Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States. (2002). Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002: Conference Report (To Accompany H.R. 3763). Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O..

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2009). Enterprise governance of information technology: achieving strategic alignment and value. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. (2004). Don’t just lead, govern: How top-performing firms govern IT. MIS Quarterly executive, 3(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., & Ross, J. (2005). A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkin, C. L., & Chenhall, R. H. (2010). A review of IT governance: A taxonomy to inform accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 107–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoit A. Aubert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aubert, B.A., Rivard, S. (2020). The Outsourcing of IT Governance. In: Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., Dibbern, J. (eds) Information Systems Outsourcing. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45819-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics