Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Information Systems Outsourcing pp 23–41Cite as

Software Architecture and Outsourcing Governance: Raising Thoroughbreds Versus Cultivating Schools of Goldfish

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

Software development projects are in need to graft external expertise and knowledge for multiple reasons and under different governance arrangements. The classic outsourcing literature focuses on integrating such knowledge under conditions where a single application is built by an outside vendor under a detailed contract dictating the process, outcomes and governance of such undertaking. In such a situation the client articulates and shares the entire business logic and system requirements of the application to be built with the vendor as dictated by the mutual contract. The growing popularity of deploying a modular micro-service architecture (MSA) questions some assumptions that underlie the classical software development outsourcing model and its governance. While under MSA software developers on the client and vendor side may continue to work on the core business logic of the whole application, multiple microservices will be outsourced from third-party vendors. Transitioning to MSA and sourcing from multiple vendors with short engagement cycles and under arms-length arrangements introduces new levels of complexity to outsourcing governance. This calls for introducing new governance logics and arrangements, new types of organizing and monitoring of software development teams, and addressing new types of risks introduced by microservice architecture and its stronger coupling with commercial service stacks (such as AWS). We introduce a granular, three-layered outsourcing model to analyze make-or-buy decisions when MSA is deployed and seek to understand its benefits and risks while establishing outsourcing arrangements. In conclusion, we identify outsourcing research challenges introduced by the growing use of MSA in software development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adeleye, B. C., Annansingh, F., & Nunes, M. P. (2004). Risk management practices in IS outsourcing: an investigation into commercial banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Information Management, 24(20), 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M., Rufino, J., Ferreira, J., Ahmed, S. H., Shah, N., & Chen, Y. (2018). Orchestration of microservices for IoT using Docker and edge computing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56, 118–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali-Babar, M., Verner, J., & Nguyen, P. (2007). Establishing and maintaining trust in software outsourcing relationships: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 1438–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (1998). Production and transaction economies in IS outsourcing: A study of the US banking industry. MIS Quarterly, 22(4), 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azure Products (2019). Retrieved from https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/.

  • Babcock, C. (2010). Management strategies for the cloud revolution: How cloud computing is transforming business and why you can’t afford to be left behind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badampudi, D., Wohlin, C., & Petersen, K. (2016). Software component decision making: In house, OSS, COTS or outsourcing—A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 121, 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakshi, K. (2017). Microservices-based software architecture and approaches. In 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battin, R. D., Crocker, R., Kreidler, J., & Subramanian, K. (2001). Leveraging resources in global software development. IEEE Software, 18(2), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benaroch, M., Lichtenstein, Y. & Fink, L. (2016). Contract design choices and the balance of ex ante and ex post transaction costs in software development outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, C., Nagappan N., Devanbu P., Gall H. & Murphy, B. (2009). Does distributed development affect software quality? An empirical case study of windows vista. In ICSE ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, 518–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B. (1981). Software engineering economics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, G. (2016). Why are so many organizations bringing outsourced IT back in-house? Computer Weekly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucchiarone, A., Dragoni, N., Dustdar, S., Larsen, S., & Mazzara, M. (2018). From monolithic to microservices: An experience report from the banking domain. IEEE Software, 35(3), 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Wire (2018). Nation’s Health CISOs Take Lead to Manage Third-Party Risk. Business Wire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. B. & Gurbaxani, V. (2012). Information technology outsourcing, knowledge transfer, and firm productivity: an empirical analysis. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1043–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Bharadwaj, A. & Goh, K. Y. (2017). An empirical analysis of intellectual property rights sharing in software development outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 131–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2003). Portfolio of control in outsourced software development projects. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, B., Pires, P. F., Delicato, F. C., & Merson, P. (2014). Evaluating REST Architectures Approach, Tooling and Guidelines. Journal of Systems and Software, 112, 156–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. (1995). IT outsourcing: British Petroleum’s competitive approach. Harvard Business Review, 73, 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibbern, J. & Heinzl, A. (2009). Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(1), 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragoni, N., Mazzara, M., Giallorenzo, S., Montesi, F., Lluch Lafuente, A., Mustafin, R., et al. (2017). Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg: In Present and Ulterior Software Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkee, D. (2010). Why Cloud Computing Will Never Be Free. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, A. H. & Mens, T. (2006). Measuring software flexibility. IEE Proc.-Softw., 153(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, D. & Willcocks, L. (1994). Outsourcing information technology: contracts and the client/vendor relationship. Oxford Institute of Information Management, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grozev, N & Buyya, R. (2014). Inter-Cloud architectures and application brokering: taxonomy and survey. Software—Practice & Experience, 44(3), 369–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, R. (2019). Buying Stock in Tech Building Blocks. Forbes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, A., Newman, M., & Similä, J. (1996). Software Contracting: A Process Model Approach. In: ICIS 1996 Proceedings, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfer, C., & Karagiannis, G. (2011). Cloud computing services: taxonomy and comparison. J Internet Serv Appl, 2(2), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, R. L. (1993). How continental bank outsourced its crown jewels. Harvard Business Review, 71, 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedia, B. L., & Lahiri, S. (2007). International Outsourcing of Services: a partnership model. Journal of International Management, 13, 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. (2000). Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships: theory and practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 321–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, C., Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (2004). IT outsourcing success: a psychological contract perspective. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 356–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotlarsky, J., Oshri, I., Dibbern, J., & Mani, D. (2018). IS Sourcing. MIS Quarterly Research Curations. Retrieved from http://misq.org/research-curations.

  • Kotlarsky, J., Scarbrough, H. & Oshri, I. (2014). Coordinating expertise across knowledge Boundaries in offshore-outsourcing projects: the role of codification. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 607–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. C., & Hirschheim, R. (1993). Information systems outsourcing. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: lessons from experience. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 363–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, P., Cito, J. & Stöckli, E. (2016). Modelling and managing deployment costs of microservice-based cloud applications. In 2016 IEEE/ACM 9th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcolin, B. L. (2002). Spiraling Effect of IS Outsourcing Contract Interpretations. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information Systems Outsourcing. Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin, pp. 223–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan, F. W., & Nolan, R. L. (1995). How to manage an IT outsourcing alliance. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 9+.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messina, A., Rizzo, R., Storniolo, P. & Urso, A. (2016). A simplified database pattern for the microservice architecture. In: The Eighth International Conference on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications (DBKDA), pp. 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezgar, I., & Rauschecker, U. (2014). The challenge of networked enterprises for cloud computing interoperability. Computers in Industry, 65(4), 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, R. (2018). 8 Reasons Companies Bring Outsourced Operations Back In-house. Logistics Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opara-Martins, J., Sahandi, R., & Tian, F. (2015). Critical review of vendor lock-in and its impact on adoption of cloud computing. International Conference on Information Society, i-Society, 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazoglou, M.P. (2012). Cloud Blueprints for Integrating and Managing Cloud Federations. In: Heisel M. (eds) Software Service and Application Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petcu, D. (2013). Multi-Cloud: Expectations and Current Approaches. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Workshop on Multi-cloud Applications and Federated Clouds, MultiCloud ’13, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, K., et al. (2017). Choosing Component Origins for Software Intensive Systems: In-house, COTS, OSS or Outsourcing? - A Case Survey. Transactions on Software Engineering, 99, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B., & Hilmer, G. (1994). Strategic Outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 35(4), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B., Doorley, T.L. & Paquette, P.C. (1990). Technology in Services: Rethinking Strategic Focus. Sloan Management Review, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., & Beath, C. M. (2006). Sustainable IT outsourcing success: let enterprise architecture be your guide. MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(4), 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabherwal, R. (2003). The evolution of coordination in outsourced software development projects: A comparison of client and vendor perspectives. Information and Organization, 13, 153–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahay, S., Nicholson B. & Krishna, S. (2003). Global IT Outsourcing. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 312–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Z. (2010). The role of IS architecture planning in enhancing IS outsourcing’s impact on IS performance: its antecedents and an empirical test. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23(4), 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Z., Kunnathur, A. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2005). IS outsourcing management competence dimensions: instrument development and relationship exploration. Information & Management, 42(6), 901–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Søderberg, A.-M., Krishna, S., & Bjørn, P. (2013). Global Software Development: Commitment, Trust and Cultural Sensitivity in Strategic Partnerships. Journal of International Management, 19(4), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tafti, M. H. A. (2005). Risks factors associated with offshore IT outsourcing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(5), 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanriverdi, H., Konana, P., & Ge, L. (2007). The choice of sourcing mechanisms for business processes. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 280–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toosi, A. N., Sinnott, R. O., & Buyya, R. (2018). Resource provisioning for data-intensive applications with deadline constraints on hybrid clouds using Aneka. Future Generation Computer Systems, 79, 765–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villamizar, M., Garcs, O., Ochoa, L., Castro, H., Salamanca, L., Verano, M., Casallas, R., Gil, S., Valencia, C., Zambrano, A. & Lang, M. (2016). Infrastructure Cost Comparison of Running Web Applications in the Cloud Using AWS Lambda and Monolithic and Microservice Architectures. In: 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, pp. 179–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., & Tate, M. (2012). A descriptive literature review and classification of cloud computing research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 31, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Cheng, L., & Boutaba, R. (2010). Cloud Computing: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Internet Service Applications, 1(1), 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Karoly Bozan

  2. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Kalle Lyytinen

  3. Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, USA

    Gregory Rose

Authors
  1. Karoly Bozan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kalle Lyytinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gregory Rose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalle Lyytinen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ourso College of Business, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA

    Rudy Hirschheim

  2. School of Business, University Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

    Armin Heinzl

  3. Institute for Information Systems, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Jens Dibbern

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bozan, K., Lyytinen, K., Rose, G. (2020). Software Architecture and Outsourcing Governance: Raising Thoroughbreds Versus Cultivating Schools of Goldfish. In: Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., Dibbern, J. (eds) Information Systems Outsourcing. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45819-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation