Advertisement

Indiana University’s Faculty-Driven Inclusive Access E-Text Program

  • Serdar Abaci
  • Joshua Quick
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

As cost of textbooks has surpassed the cost of other educational resources, electronic textbooks (e-texts) have become a viable alternative. To lower the cost of course materials for students, Indiana University (IU) implemented a university-wide e-text program in 2012. This program is faculty-driven: if a faculty chooses to use e-text for her class, all students in the class will get access to the course textbook on the first day of class. E-text adoption at IU has been growing strongly: in 2018 alone, 2,382 faculty adopted e-texts in 4,185 sections, in which over 92,000 students read e-texts that resulted in $11.8 million savings in college cost. Faculty adoption is one of the distinct components and the keystone of IU’s e-text program. Therefore, in this case study, we present IU’s e-text implementation with a focus on how it supports faculty adoption, from outreach efforts and support for integration to faculty experience with adoption and use of e-texts. We interviewed seven instructors with varying degrees of engagement with e-texts. Our interviews indicate that cost advantage of e-texts is the primary reason for instructors to adopt. IU’s e-text model may be lowering the barriers to faculty’s adoption of e-texts as faculty feel they do not have to give up content quality for affordable price. In terms of engagement with e-texts, our interviews and e-text usage data suggest that technology use may lend itself to better engagement and learning when the technology affordances (e.g., interactive markup features) are coupled with appropriate pedagogy. In conclusion, this case study highlights that success of a university-wide e-text program relies on faculty buy-in as well as instructional/pedagogical support.

Keywords

Inclusive access e-Texts Indiana Faculty Adoption Choice Outreach Support Engagement Higher education 

References

  1. 1.
    Abaci, S., BrckaLorenz, A., & Quick, J. (2019, April). Examining students’ use of, preferences for, and learning with E-textbooks. Paper presented at the 2019 Annual AERA Meeting, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abaci, S., & Morrone, A. S. (2018). Indiana University’s affordable e-text model and strategies to increase impact beyond savings. In K. Jensen & S. Nackerud (Eds.), The evolution of affordable content efforts in the higher education environment: Programs, case studies, and examples (Ch.18). [Open Access E-book].
  3. 3.
    Abaci, S., Morrone, A., & Dennis, A. (2015). Instructor engagement with e-texts. Educause Review, 50(1) [Online].
  4. 4.
    Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Opening the textbook: Educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2015–16. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthetextbook2016.pdf
  5. 5.
    Baglione, S. L., & Sullivan, K. (2016). Technology and textbooks: The future. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2016). College tuition and fees increase 63 percent since January 2006. The Economics Daily, [Online] Retrieved on October 11, 2018.
  7. 7.
    Edmondson, D. R., & Ward, C. (2017). Students’ attitudes towards textbook types: Are students really ready for e-textbooks? Atlantic Marketing Journal, 5(3), 1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knight, B., Casey, M., & Dekkers, J. (2017). Using electronic textbooks to teach mathematics in the secondary classroom: What do the students say? International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 13(1).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lai, J. Y., & Rushikesh Ulhas, K. (2012). Understanding acceptance of dedicated e-textbook applications for learning: Involving Taiwanese university students. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis, D. (2018). eTexts 101: A practical guide. [Open Access E-book].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reid, P. (2014). Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wheeler, B. (2018). Negotiating with the family feuds. In D. Lewis (Ed.), eTexts 101: A practical guide (pp. 37–50). [Open Access E-book].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gosney, J., & Morrone, A. S. (2018). Rolling out an etext program: Communication and education. In D. Lewis (Ed.), eTexts 101: A practical guide (pp. 59–73). [Open Access E-book].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serdar Abaci
    • 1
  • Joshua Quick
    • 2
  1. 1.Moray House School of Education and SportEdinburgh UniversityEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations