Advertisement

E-Textbooks, Inclusive Access, and Academic Performance

  • Tracy A. HurleyEmail author
  • Amir Fekrazad
Chapter
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Many colleges and universities are considering the adoption of an institutional e-textbook program as a strategy to control the cost of higher education and to ensure students have the required course content needed in order to be successful in the course. Although controlling costs is an important component of these programs, it is also important to assess whether students who enroll in e-text courses actually perform better than students who do not. Three years of student data from nearly 13,000 students and over 3600 classes – to include course grades, demographics, and course delivery modality – were collected from e-textbook courses and non-e-textbook courses. Results suggest that students enrolled in e-textbook courses earn higher grades than students enrolled in non-e-textbook courses. This is true for both undergraduate and graduate students and regardless of ethnicity. Implications are discussed as well as the importance of developing an institutional e-textbook program that meets the needs of campus stakeholders.

Keywords

Inclusive Access e-textbook Performance Goals Tuition Cost Student success Undergraduate Graduate Comparison 

References

  1. 1.
    Ainsa, P. (2015). Effects of college students’ characteristics, culture, and language on using E-texts in distance education. Education, 136(1), 63–68.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2016). The Economics Daily, College tuition and fees increase 63 percent since January 2006 on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/college-tuition-and-fees-increase-63-percent-since-january-2006.htm (visited January 23, 2020).
  3. 3.
    Chiu, T. K. F. (2017). Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: Atop-down adoption process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 524–537.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12432.
  4. 4.
    Chulkov, D. V., & VanAlstine, J. (2013). College student choice among electronic and printed textbook options. Journal of Education for Business, 88(4), 216–222.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.672936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 6, 218–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Falc, E. O. (2013). An assessment of college students’ attitudes towards using an online E-textbook. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 9, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Millar, M., & Schrier, T. (2015). Digital or printed textbooks: Which do students prefer and why? Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15(2), 166–185.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2015.1026474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor, A. K. (2011). Students learn equally well from digital as from paperbound texts. Teaching of Psychology, 38(4), 278–281.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311421330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Digest of education statistics, 2017 (NCES 2018-070), Table 330.10.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M University-San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations