Abstract
The consistent growth of electronic textbooks (e-texts) within higher education contexts has led cheaper, more accessible resources for students. Despite this continued growth, the introduction of technology such as e-texts does not necessarily lend itself to more effective teaching and learning practices. Student perceptions on their use of e-texts and the impact of these tools on their engagement and learning present one source of evidence for determining the efficacy of inclusive digital content delivery systems. This chapter describes a survey study conducted with undergraduate students at Indiana University, who has been running a successful university-wide e-text program since 2012. The study used a subset of the National Survey of Student Engagement, specifically designed to examine students’ use of, preferences for, and perceived learning with e-texts. Data from 284 students indicated that they generally used e-texts in relation to their class-assigned reading activities. Interactive features within the e-text were moderately to infrequently used in relation to their learning practices. Students also indicated that their use of e-texts had generally positive benefits on their learning. From these results, we discuss the implications of further integrating e-texts within higher education through extended support and scaffolding of these tools for both teaching and learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abaci, S., Quick, J., & Morrone, A. (2017). Student engagement with e-texts: What the data tell us. Educause Review [Online].
Abaci, S., BrckaLorenz, A., & Quick, J. (2019). Examining students’ use of, preferences for, and learning with e-textbooks. In Paper presented at the Annual AERA 2019 Meeting, Toronto, ON.
Barajas-Murphy, N. (2017). Digital textbooks: A study of factors affecting college student adoption (Doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne).
Chapman, J. R., Seeley, E. L., Wright, N. S., Glenn, L. M., & Adams, L. L. (2016). An empirical evaluation of a broad ranging E-text adoption with recommendations for improving deployment success for students. E-journal of. Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 10(2), 1–14.
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325.
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Jensen, M., & Scharff, L. (2019). Improving critical Reading with E-texts: A controlled study in a collegiate philosophy course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i2.23978.
Ji, S. W., Michaels, S., & Waterman, D. (2014). Print vs electronic readings in college courses: Cost-efficiency and perceived learning. Internet & Higher Education, 21, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.004.
Junco, R., & Clem, C. (2015). Predicting course outcomes with digital textbook usage data. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.001.
Knight, B., Casey, M., & Dekkers, J. (2017). Using electronic textbooks to teach mathematics in the secondary classroom: What do the students say? International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 13(1), 87–102.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–32.
Kuh, G. D. (2007). What student engagement data tell us about college readiness. Peer Review, 9(1), 4–8.
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Boston: Springer.
Ross, B., Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C., & Chase, A. M. (2017). Print versus digital texts: Understanding the experimental research and challenging the dichotomies. Research in Learning Technology, 25, 1–12.
Schuh, K. L., Van Horne, S., & Russell, J. E. (2018). E-textbook as object and mediator: Interactions between instructor and student activity systems. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(2), 298–325.
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041.
Sommers, S. R., Shin, L. M., Greenebaum, S. L., Merker, J., & Sanders, A. S. (2019). Quasi-experimental and experimental assessment of electronic textbook experiences: Student perceptions and test performance. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(1), 11.
Van Horne, S., Russell, J. E., & Schuh, K. L. (2016). The adoption of mark-up tools in an interactive e- textbook reader. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9425-x.
Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945–948.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abaci, S., Quick, J. (2020). University-Wide e-Text Adoption and Students’ Use of, Preferences for, and Learning with e-Textbooks. In: Hurley, T. (eds) Inclusive Access and Open Educational Resources E-text Programs in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45730-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45730-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45729-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45730-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)