Abstract
Research suggests that persuasive strategies are more effective when tailored to individuals or groups of similar individuals. Demographic data such as gender, age, culture, and personality are being used in domains such as health to tailor persuasive strategies. However, in e-commerce, these factors are unknown to e-commerce companies making it impossible to use them to tailor persuasive strategies. Other factors such as shoppers’ online motivation have been proposed as suitable factors to use in tailoring persuasive strategies in e-commerce. To contribute to research in this area, we investigated the susceptibility of e-commerce shoppers to persuasive strategies based on their online shopping motivation. To achieve this, we developed and evaluated a shopping game, ShopRight that simulates a retail store where players can shop for groceries. The healthiest product on each aisle is presented to the player along with a persuasive message. We recruited 187 participants to play ShopRight for at least three rounds. Players were classified into groups based on their online shopping motivation and their responses to the persuasive messages were recorded. Using pre- and post-game surveys, we also identified changes in attitude, intention, self-efficacy and perceived price of products.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adaji, I., Oyibo, K., Vassileva, J.: Shopper types and the influence of persuasive strategies in e-commerce. In: International Workshop on Personalized Persuasive Technology, Waterloo 2018, pp. 58–65 (2018)
Adaji, I., Vassileva, J.: Perceived effectiveness, credibility and continuance intention in e-commerce. A study of Amazon. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Amsterdam 2017, pp. 293–306 (2017)
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: The influence of attitudes on behavior. In: The Handbook of Attitudes, vol. 31, pp. 173–221 (2005)
Alkış, N., Taşkaya Temizel, T.: The impact of individual differences on influence strategies. Personality Individ. Differ. 87, 147–152 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2015.07.037
Busch, M., Mattheiss, E., Reisinger, M., Orji, R., Fröhlich, P., Tscheligi, M.: More than sex: the role of femininity and masculinity in the design of personalized persuasive games. In: Meschtscherjakov, A., De Ruyter, B., Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9638, pp. 219–229. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_19
Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: Science and practice. Pearson Education, Boston (2009)
Ganesh, J., Reynolds, K., Luckett, M., Pomirleanu, N.: Online shopper motivations, and e-store attributes: an examination of online patronage behavior and shopper typologies. J. Retail. 86(1), 106–115 (2010)
Hirsh, J.B., Kang, S.K., Bodenhausen, G.V.: Personalized persuasion: tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychol. Sci. 23(6), 578–581 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611436349
Jia, Y., Xu, B., Karanam, Y. and Voida, S. 2016. Personality-targeted gamification: a survey study on personality traits and motivational affordances. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 2001–2013
Kaptein, M.: Adaptive persuasive messages in an e-commerce setting: the use of persuasion profiles. In: European Conference on Information Systems, p. 183 (2011)
Kaptein, M., Halteren, A.: Adaptive persuasive messaging to increase service retention: using persuasion profiles to increase the effectiveness of email reminders. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17(6), 1173–1185 (2013)
Kaptein, M., De Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P.: Adaptive persuasive systems: a study of tailored persuasive text messages to reduce snacking. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2(2), 1–25 (2012)
Keng Kau, A., Tang, Y.E., Ghose, S.: Typology of online shoppers. J. Consum. Market. 20(2), 139–156 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760310464604
Kramer, T., Spolter-Weisfeld, S.: The effect of cultural orientation on consumer responses to personalization. Mark. Sci. 26(2), 246–258 (2007)
Madden, T.J., Ellen, P.S., Ajzen, I.: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18(1), 3–9 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181001
Mason, W., Suri, S.: Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44(1), 1–23 (2012)
McGaghie, W.C., et al.: Development of a measure of attitude toward nutrition in patient care. Am. J. Prev. Med. 20(1), 15–20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00264-6
Moe, W.: Buying, searching, or browsing: Differentiating between online shoppers using in-store navigational clickstream. J. Consum. Psychol. 13(1–2), 29–39 (2003)
Orji, R.: Design for behaviour change: a model-driven approach for tailoring persuasive technologies. University of Saskatchewan (2014)
Orji, R.: The impact of cultural differences on the persuasiveness of influence strategies. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference 2016 on Persuasive Technology, pp. 38–41 (2016)
Orji, R., Mandryk, R., Vassileva, J.: Gender and persuasive technology: examining the persuasiveness of persuasive strategies by gender groups. In: International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 48–52 (2014)
Pappas, I., Kouurouthanassis, P., Giannakos, M., Lekakos, G.: The interplay of online shopping motivations and experiential factors on personalized e-commerce: a complexity theory approach. Telematics and Inform. 34(5), 730–742 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2016.08.021
Phillips, D.M., Stanton, J.L.: Age-related differences in advertising: recall and persuasion. J. Target. Meas. Anal. Market. 13(1), 7–20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740128
Rohm, A.J., Swaminathan, V.: A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations. J. Bus. Res. 57(7), 748–757 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00351-X
Scarborough, P., Matthews, A.: Reds are more important than greens: how UK supermarket shoppers use the different information on a traffic light nutrition label in a choice experiment. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 12(1), 151 (2015)
Schifter, D.E., Ajzen, I.: Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: an application of the theory of planned behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49(3), 843–851 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843
Sherer, M., Maddux, J.E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., Rogers, R.W.: The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychol. Rep. 51(2), 663–671 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
Smith, K., Dennis, M., Masthoff, J.: Personalizing reminders to personality for melanoma self-checking. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 85–93 (2016)
de Vries, R.A.J., Truong, K.P., Zaga, C., Li, J., Evers, V.: A word of advice: how to tailor motivational text messages based on behavior change theory to personality and gender. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 21(4), 675–687 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1025-1
Zeithaml, V.A.: Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 2–22 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Adaji, I., Kiron, N., Vassileva, J. (2020). Evaluating the Susceptibility of E-commerce Shoppers to Persuasive Strategies. A Game-Based Approach. In: Gram-Hansen, S., Jonasen, T., Midden, C. (eds) Persuasive Technology. Designing for Future Change. PERSUASIVE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12064. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45712-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45712-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45711-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45712-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)