Skip to main content

Evaluating the Acceptance of Blended-Learning Tools: A Case Study Using SlideWiki Presentation Rooms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1161))

Abstract

As e-learning formats become increasingly important, technological assistance becomes a critical factor for its implementation. The tool SlideWiki Presentation Rooms tries to combine the needs and functions of live interaction with the advantages of e-learning. To evaluate the acceptance of the tool a teaching experiment was conducted at an University of Applied Sciences. The results show, that the actual usage of a new blended-learning tool is more determined by the perceived usefulness than the ease of use and implicates further influence factors on students acceptance towards SlideWiki. They provide valuable insights for the successful implementation of blended-learning tools in higher education and need to be further examined in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Data Deposition & Supplemental Online Material

SlideWiki itself is Open-Source and the source-code is hosted at https://github.com/slidewiki/. SlideWiki is officially hosted at https://slidewiki.org and includes the same feature set as the institutional one, used in this study.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Moodle is a Learning Management System, see: https://moodle.de/.

  2. 2.

    EvaSys evaluation system: https://en.evasys.de/main/add-ons-services/system-security-performance.html.

References

  1. López-Pérez, M.V., Pérez-López, M.C., Rodríguez-Ariza, L.: Blended learning in higher education: students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Comput. Educ. 56(3), 818–826 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Drummer, J., Hambach, S., Kienle, A., Lucke, U., Martens, A., Müller, W., Rensing, C., Schroeder, U., Schwill, A., Spannagel, C., et al.: Forschungsherausforderung des E-Learnings. In: Rohland, H., Kienle, A., Friedrich, S. (eds.) DeLFI 2011 - Die 9. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, pp. 197–208. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V, Bonn (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meissner, R., Junghanns, K., Martin, M.: A decentralized and remote controlled webinar approach, utilizing client-side capabilities: to increase participant limits and reduce operating costs. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST, pp. 153–160. INSTICC, SciTePress (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elias, M., James, A., Ruckhaus, E., Suarez-Figueroa, M.C., de Graaf, K.A., Khalili, A., Wulff, B.M., Lohmann, S., Auer, S.: SlideWiki - towards a collaborative and accessible slide presentations. In: EC–TEL 2018, 13th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Practitioner Proceedings, Leeds, UK. Fraunhofer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mikroyannidis, A.: Collaborative authoring of open courseware with slidewiki: a case study in open education. In: EDULEARN 2018 Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 2000–2007 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raspopovic, M., Cvetanovic, S., Medan, I., Ljubojevic, D.: The effects of integrating social learning environment with online learning. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 18, 141–160 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kergel, D., Heidkamp, B.: Digitalisierung der Lehre – Chancen für eBologna, pp. 145–160. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Siemens, G.: Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn. 2(1), 3–10 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dräger, J., Müller-Eiselt, R.: Die digitale Bildungsrevolution - Der radikale Wandel des Lernens und wie wir ihn gestalten können, 4th edn. DVA, München (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prilla, M., Nolte, A.: Fostering self-direction in participatory process design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, PDC 2010, pp. 227–230. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43(6), 740–755 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schepers, J., Wetzels, M.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf. Manag. 44, 90–103 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Birken, T.: IT-basierte Innovation als Implementationsproblem. Evolution und Grenzen des Technikakzeptanzmodell-Paradigmas, alternative Forschungsansätze und Anknüpfungspunkte für eine praxistheoretische Perspektive auf Innovationsprozesse. ISF München (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilhelm, D.B.: Pre-Test eines Modells zur Erklärung der C.9 Nutzerakzeptanz von web-basierten “sozialen” Unternehmensanwendungen. In: GeNeMe 2009 Gemeinschaften in Neuen Medien, TU Dresden, 01./02.10.2009, Virtuelle Organisation und Neue Medien 2009, pp. 203–214. TU Dresden (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nadler, J.T., Weston, R., Voyles, E.C.: Stuck in the middle: the use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires. J. Gen. Psychol. 142(2), 71–89 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schöneck, N.M., Voß, W.: Das Forschungsprojekt: Planung, Durchführung und Auswertung einer quantitativen Studie. Springer, Wiesbaden (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 program No 688095; the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for the EVELIN project under grant No 01PL17022E; the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for the tech4comp project under grant No 16DHB2102. The Authors thank Professor Philipp Brune for establishing their connection and his support in this study by including the tool in one of his lectures in summer term 2019. The authors are responsible for the content of this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to this work equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bianca Bergande .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martin, A., Bergande, B., Meissner, R. (2020). Evaluating the Acceptance of Blended-Learning Tools: A Case Study Using SlideWiki Presentation Rooms. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S., Orovic, I., Moreira, F. (eds) Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1161. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45697-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics