Abstract
Social Darwinism is a largely discredited philosophy that based moral judgments on Darwin’s theory of evolution. Because natural selection, the operative mode of evolution, selected favorable variations and rejected injurious variations Social Darwinism advocated behavior that mimicked evolution. Social Darwinism advocates survival of the fittest and places the welfare of society over that of the individual.
The British philosopher Herbert Spencer, whose name has been most prominently linked with Social Darwinism, believed evolutionary theory should be applied in various social fields including morality. Social Darwinists feared that well-intentioned interventional programs would lead to “the multiplication of the reckless and incompetent”.
Social Darwinism has been largely discredited because it was, to varying degrees, used to justify unethical practices such as involuntary sterilizations, eugenics, and Nazi racism. Although science can provide information that contributes to the resolution of ethical dilemmas it should not be the source of our moral values.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agar, Nicholas. 2004. Liberal Eugenics, in Defense of Human Enhancement. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Barondess, Jeremiah A. 1998. Care of the Medical Ethos: Reflections on Social Darwinism.
Bowler, Peter. 2016. Social Darwinism. Oxford Bibliographies. May 26, 2016.
Buck v Bell. 1927 274US200.
Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man. London: John Murray.
Goering, Sara. 2014. Eugenics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/eugenics/. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.
Kenney, Nancy J., and McGowan, Michelle L. 2014. Egg donation compensation: Ethical and legal challenges. Dove Press (4): 15–24.
Lauriergracht, Frans Roes. 1997. An Interview of Richard Dawkins. Human Ethology Bulletin 12 (1): 1–3.
Leonard, Thomas C. 2009a. Origins of the myth of social Darwinism: The ambiguous legacy of Richard Hofstader’s social Darwinism. American Thought Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 71: 37–51.
Leonard, Thomas C. 2009b. Origins of the myth of social Darwinism: The ambiguous legacy of Richard Hofstader’s social Darwinism in American thought. The Economist Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 71: 37–51.
Levy, David M., and Pearl, Sandra J. 2009. Sympathy, evolution and The economist. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 71: 29–36.
Plotz, David. 2019. The “Genius Babies” and How They Grew. Available at www.slate.com/articles/life/seed/2001/02/the_genius_babies_and_how_they_grew.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.
Racial Hygiene, and the Holocaust. Annals of Internal Medicine 129: 891–898.
Ruse, Michael. 2009a. Introduction in Evolution and Ethics Princeton. Princeton University Press.
Ruse, Michael. 2009b. Charles Darwin on human evolution. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 71 (1): 10–19.
Sweet, William. 2019. Herbert Spencer. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu/spencer/#H6. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.
Wade, Nicholas. 2015. Scientists seek ban on method of editing the human genome. New York Times, 19 Mar 2015.
Zehr, E. Paul. 2019. Human gene editing: great power, great responsibility. Scientific American, 16 Jan 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinberg, D. (2020). Social Darwinism. In: The Multidisciplinary Nature of Morality and Applied Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45680-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45680-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45679-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45680-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)