Advertisement

Fuzzy Best-Worst Method and Interpretive Structural Modelling for Complex System Analysis: Enablers Analysis for Aviation Maintenance Safety

Chapter
  • 211 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

This study aims at employing the multi-criteria decision analysis method for analyzing the enablers of aviation maintenance safety, the twelve enablers of aviation maintenance safety in human, facilities, institution and management aspects were firstly summarized; subsequently, the fuzzy best-worst network method was used to prioritize these enablers according to their relative importance, and the significantly important and moderately important enablers can be identified; then, eight strategic measures were proposed according to the relative importance of the enablers; finally, the interpretive structural modelling was employed to investigate the complex relationships among these eight strategic measures, and drafting appropriate plan and schedule, training on aviation maintenance, education on safety maintenance awareness, perfect the regulation and standard system, and establishing complete safety management system should be adopted by the decision-makers/stakeholders to improve the aviation maintenance safety.

References

  1. F. Abadi, I. Sahebi, A. Arab, A. Alavi, H. Karachi, Application of best-worst method in evaluation of medical tourism development strategy. Decis. Sci. Lett. 7(1), 77–86 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. M.A. Agi, R. Nishant, Understanding influential factors on implementing green supply chain management practices: An interpretive structural modelling analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 188, 351–363 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. M. Dağdeviren, İ. Yüksel, M. Kurt, A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work system. Saf. Sci. 46(5), 771–783 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. M.R. Endsley, M.M. Robertson, Situation awareness in aircraft maintenance teams. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 26(2), 301–325 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao and Wang, Research on influence factors of maintenance safety in general aviation based on G1-DEMATEL method. J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 12(2), 164–169 (2016). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. J. Gao, M. Duan, L. Zhao, Q. Che, Aviation equipment maintenance and support safety risk assessment based on improved ANP. Aviat. Maint Eng 5, 58–60 (2010). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. S. Guo, H. Zhao, Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowl.-Based Syst. 121, 23–31 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Gupta, M.K. Barua, Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. J. Clean. Prod. 152, 242–258 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Hafezalkotob, A. Hafezalkotob, A novel approach for combination of individual and group decisions based on fuzzy best-worst method. Appl. Soft Comput. (2017)Google Scholar
  10. G. Kannan, S. Pokharel, P.S. Kumar, A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54(1), 28–36 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. C.Y. Kim, B.H. Song, A study on safety culture in aviation maintenance organization. Adv. Sci. Technol. Lett. 120, 485–490 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. R.M. Knotts, Civil aircraft maintenance and support fault diagnosis from a business perspective. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 5(4), 335–348 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Rezaei, Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53, 49–57 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Ren, S. Tan, M.E. Goodsite, B.K. Sovacool, L. Dong, Sustainability, shale gas, and energy transition in China: assessing barriers and prioritizing strategic measures. Energy 84, 551–562 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Ren, H. Liang, F.T. Chan, Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 116, 29–39 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. J.N. Warfield, Toward interpretation of complex structural modeling. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 4(5), 405–417 (1974a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. J.N. Warfield, Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 4(1), 81–87 (1974b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Y. Xia, D. Guo, H. Zhang, Research on assessment parameters of aviation service safety culture. Aviat. Maint Eng. 5, 77–80 (2010). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. M. Zamani, A. Rabbani, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, Z. Turskis, An integrated model for extending brand based on fuzzy ARAS and ANP methods. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 15(3), 403–423 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Y. Zhang, S. Wu, X. Liu, B. He, J. Xiao, Dynamic evaluation of aviation maintenance safety based on set pair analysis and Marko chain. China Saf. Sci. J. 26(1), 122–128 (2016). (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations